The article probably forgot to mention how Rose (probably) was nude at the time she caught the guy, and without any inhibitions, she ran after him naked, the whole time yelling, "You bastard! What? I wasn't good enough for your sleazy little home porno? You're only interested in those two?"
All The News That's Fit To Fuck Me: Media Appearances
Started by
DiePhoebeDie
, Jan 01 2004 08:56 AM
10635 replies to this topic
#1
Posted Jan 1, 2004 @ 8:56 AM
#2
Posted Jan 1, 2004 @ 8:14 PM
We now have proof that different characters orb differently, and that said differences are intentional.
So why is it still massively inconsistent and fucked up. Idiots.
#3
Posted Jan 1, 2004 @ 10:58 PM
That was a rhetorical question, wasn't it, X ? ;)
#4
Posted Jan 2, 2004 @ 10:59 AM
Saturday on USA Channel there is a fabulous Shannen double feature:
Another Day and Satan's School For Girls
starting at 12p Central
Another Day and Satan's School For Girls
starting at 12p Central
#5
Posted Jan 2, 2004 @ 3:45 PM
Taking pictures of a pregnant lady changing? Ew. Ew.
#6
Posted Jan 2, 2004 @ 6:52 PM
Taking pictures of a pregnant lady changing?
I thought about that too. Was the guy/person a fan or paparazi (sp?). I wonder what he wanted to do with the photos (not really, I have a pretty good idea what he wanted to do with them).
#7
Posted Jan 2, 2004 @ 8:39 PM
And Phoebe's use of a Mac for her column? Nonsense. My dad worked for a major NYC newspaper for over thirty years and about ten years ago, they all switched from Macs to PCs.
I work for a fairly big UK magazine publishing company. Apart from the magazines that are *about* PCs, and have to have some in the office just for work purposes... everything creative is done on Macs.
Same with every other UK mag publisher I've seen. Even where it might be technically *cheaper* for a junior staffer to use a no-brand beige-box PC for writing, nine times out of ten they'll still use an old-model iMac or an eMac (hell, we still have some decade-old Quadras in service for staff writers who don't need to run anything other than Word, IE and Eudora), because the entire production process is Mac-based and it causes fewer problems in the long run.
Dunno about newspapers, but hey, this is Hollywood. The good guys *always* use Macs. ;)
#8
Posted Jan 3, 2004 @ 12:44 AM
Don't suppose you could get me a job payndz? I'm good, honest, and will work for peanuts. Literally, as long as it's lots and lots of peanuts. I can write about anything and am such an anal proof reader that I regularly have to restrain myself from correcting people's grammar on these boards.
:) Kidding.
No, actually, I'm not.
:) Kidding.
No, actually, I'm not.
#9
Posted Jan 3, 2004 @ 11:06 PM
That was a rhetorical question, wasn't it, X ? ;)
Yep. I finished posting, thought 'I forgot the question mark', but then realised it was perfect as it is.
So no publicity stills for the new eps yet?
Edited by xtremesage, Jan 3, 2004 @ 11:07 PM.
#10
Posted Jan 4, 2004 @ 11:18 AM
Speaking of which, when is the next new ep airing? Frickin' February?
#11
Posted Jan 4, 2004 @ 11:29 AM
I heard it was January 11th, so next week, but I'm not sure about after that.
#12
Posted Jan 4, 2004 @ 10:31 PM
Witchstock airs this Sunday. After that, I have no idea.
#13
Posted Jan 5, 2004 @ 6:14 PM
I don't think it's a double post if it's a day later...
Witchstock pics up at that place.
The fuck? Is that Gary Busey? *shudder*
Witchstock pics up at that place.
The fuck? Is that Gary Busey? *shudder*
#14
Posted Jan 5, 2004 @ 6:24 PM
That's it? Three pictures? I've waited this long for three pictures? That sucks. Whatever.
Is Prince Charmed going to be airing the same night as Witchstock? Because I couldn't tell from the previews and if it is I've got a serious problem.
Is Prince Charmed going to be airing the same night as Witchstock? Because I couldn't tell from the previews and if it is I've got a serious problem.
#15
Posted Jan 5, 2004 @ 6:30 PM
No, just Witchstock.
#16
Posted Jan 5, 2004 @ 7:34 PM
Just checked out Living TV's website. From Drew Fuller's bio:
All in one day.
According to WGN's website (wgntv.com), "Witchstock" is airing on January 11, and "Prince Charmed" airs on January 18.
Drew Fuller was born and raised in Los Angeles, California on May 19, 1980.
All in one day.
According to WGN's website (wgntv.com), "Witchstock" is airing on January 11, and "Prince Charmed" airs on January 18.
#17
Posted Jan 5, 2004 @ 9:04 PM
He managed to age that beautifully in just one day. That's some impressive living.
#18
Posted Jan 5, 2004 @ 9:10 PM
The fuck? Is that Gary Busey? *shudder*
No, but I think it is Jr.
Edited by tvjunkie, Jan 5, 2004 @ 9:11 PM.
#19
Posted Jan 5, 2004 @ 9:12 PM
Sorry, that's who I meant. Man, is this considered a step up for him?
From shit like Tomcats I mean?
From shit like Tomcats I mean?
#21
Posted Jan 5, 2004 @ 9:32 PM
She does. But she also looks painfully bored.
And it looks like we're playing the pillow game to hide the belly.
And it looks like we're playing the pillow game to hide the belly.
#22
Posted Jan 5, 2004 @ 9:52 PM
Sadly, I've enjoyed that game, and I'm not pregnant.
What?
Beer bloats a guy.
What?
Beer bloats a guy.
#23
Posted Jan 5, 2004 @ 10:18 PM
BWAHAHA! DPD, you crack me up.
#24
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 9:18 AM
They're also using her hair and vest to cover her enlarged breasts.And it looks like we're playing the pillow game to hide the belly.
#25
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 11:39 AM
They're also using her hair and vest to cover her enlarged breasts.
I really don't know why, if she has it she should flaunt it. She looks better pregnant than normal Phoebe.
#26
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 4:36 PM
Just checked out Living TV's website. From Drew Fuller's bio:
Drew Fuller was born and raised in Los Angeles, California on May 19, 1980.
All in one day.
Wow. Mole-nose was quite the fast developer. I know that kids today supposedly get past childhood quickly, but jeez!
And he's only 23? My god, the Charmed Ones' whitelighter is a *child* in comparison to them! :)
#27
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 5:17 PM
I don't know if the folks at thewb.com fucked up or not, but the episode gallery for Witchstock is up already:
Witchstock gallery
Not a fan of the actress they've gotten to play Gram's the younger. She doesn't look right.
Witchstock gallery
Not a fan of the actress they've gotten to play Gram's the younger. She doesn't look right.
#29
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 5:32 PM
I thought that one might hurt you D. I actually gagged more over the orbs as peace sign pic.
#30
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 5:39 PM
At least he does look younger. And um, cuter. And... yeah, that.
Television Without Pity • © 2013 Bravo Media LLC • A Division of NBCUniversal • Terms of Use • Privacy Policy • AdChoices