13-7: "Fallen Angels" 2012.11.14
#1
Posted Nov 15, 2012 @ 3:37 PM
#2
Posted Nov 15, 2012 @ 5:09 PM
I hereby nominate DB for insensitive jerk of the year award. "too bad he's not here to help us out." Yeah way too bad he's DEAD so he is not available to provide background info on the neighborhood. Because that is the only reason Warrick should not be dead.
And yeah, the CSIs were nasty to Warrick's EX-wife. She cheated on their friend, that is why she is EX.
But of course, it took Finn to call Child Protective Services and save the child from his crackhead Mom. Who will get him back if she promises CPS she really will get her act together, no proof necessary. Although the removal scene was not well-handled.
Oh goody, a Finn centric episode next week. Never had one of those before. I believe I have plans for the same time as next episode.
Edited by merylinkid, Nov 15, 2012 @ 5:10 PM.
#3
Posted Nov 15, 2012 @ 5:24 PM
I liked Brass getting his snark on in this episode. And Nick seems to have solved his hair issue by removing it from the equation. Other than that, um, the kid was cute?
#4
Posted Nov 15, 2012 @ 6:56 PM
remember when he let Catherine believe that there was something percolating but he was with Tina already? That was cloaked resentment and pitiless cruely/retaliation for Catherine's flirtatiousness.
So Nick never became a Big Brother to Warwick's son.
#5
Posted Nov 15, 2012 @ 7:39 PM
Can't wait to read the re-caps of next week's Super Shue episode. Cause I sure won't be watching that.
lolAnd Nick seems to have solved his hair issue by removing it from the equation.
#6
Posted Nov 15, 2012 @ 10:31 PM
I did appreciate the red herring that was presented when the aunt was talking about James' mother getting visions (hearing voices?) and going crazy. I was sure that it would turn out that James had a split personality and was the killer without realizing it. I was also a little afraid that they would have Warrick's son be involved somehow, but figured that he was too young for them to go there storywise (and I knew that it wasn't Tina--that was too obvious). That being said, I didn't really care who the killer was by the end. Oh, I was also worried for a minute that our good guy Nick would take Warrick's kid in instead of having him sent to a foster family. But, he probably has his hands full with his new adopted canine buddy.
#7
Posted Nov 15, 2012 @ 11:11 PM
#8
Posted Nov 15, 2012 @ 11:40 PM
#9
Posted Nov 16, 2012 @ 12:21 AM
The best part was that the bad guy's confession. Interesting how he said that no one would have ever taken him for a protector. Was there some regret in that I wonder.
#10
Posted Nov 16, 2012 @ 6:40 AM
Well that fell flat.
Sometimes when I'm watching a bad TV episode, I think that the show's writers had a good idea that just got poorly executed. This bad TV episode was a bad idea that got poorly executed. It was confusing, it was stupid and it was saccharine. And whole lot more bad, I'm just too tired to think of any more adjectives.
I guess the actor did an okay job reading the lines, but I just found myself agreeing with him. Yeah, no one would believe that a career criminal would be paying any attention to a kid you had never bothered with and who didn't even know you were his father, because, well, that doesn't happen. I know its supposed to be fiction, but its a crime drama not a fairy tale.The best part was that the bad guy's confession.
#11
Posted Nov 16, 2012 @ 8:46 AM
Even better would have been to have a clip or two of Warrick with Nick. Obviously that wasn't possible, given how Gary was dismissed by the show.
I really didn't buy Tina's reasons for rejecting help from the CSIs. It's not like any of them were threatening to take Ely from her at the funeral. Sara's a self-admitted "non-kid" person and Nick just isn't the type who meddles like that. The only one she might have seen as a threat would have been Catherine, who had a thing for Warrick and was a mum herself. Also, they established in Gum Drops, that Tina's father was a professor or doctor. So how could her parents go along with her living in a bad part of town.
The sad fact is, this is an old show with writers who are most interested in writing for the newest characters and not the long-time ones. I got the impression that the writer of this wasn't on staff while Warrick was part of the show. Another reason it didn't pan out as we'd hoped.
#12
Posted Nov 16, 2012 @ 3:57 PM
The sad fact is, this is an old show with writers who are most interested in writing for the newest characters and not the long-time ones. I got the impression that the writer of this wasn't on staff while Warrick was part of the show. Another reason it didn't pan out as we'd hoped.
That is very sad. There were some excellent opportunities there that were completely wasted. I do have to say it was interesting to note that since this case had nothing personal for The Shue or DB so there couldn't be ANY overly emotional scenes. It was nice that the characters that actually knew Warrick, Nick, Brass, Sara and Greg, actually mentioned him but it could have been so much better. My favorite scenes were Nick and Brass. Those two don't get enough scenes together.
I have come to the conclusion that the writers don't even care that there used to be a show bible and that there may be viewers still hanging around that pay attention to the little details that used to play such a huge part in the past.
#13
Posted Nov 16, 2012 @ 5:50 PM
So Nick never became a Big Brother to Warwick's son.
I think it was made clear that that was because Tina didn't want him near her son. Nick hadn't forgotten about Warrick (see flowers at grave). Which sounds like Nick.
Ooooh Gum drops, brilliant epi, I think I might have to dig that one up and rewatch it!
#14
Posted Nov 18, 2012 @ 5:04 AM
Ooooh Gum drops, brilliant epi, I think I might have to dig that one up and rewatch it!
I'd rewatch it too, except it might make me depressed about how dull CSI is this season. Actually, I've watched the episode recently, and it's so awesome. It was the first episode to show us how a CSI without Grissom might look, and the cast carried it off really well. For an episode which seemed really depressing, it managed to end on a watery smile (the little girl lived!). Everyone was awesome in it, and we even got some continuity from Grave Danger, after having been robbed of Nick's slow recovery in previous episodes.
This one? Meh. I just found it dull. I don't know why the showrunners bothered to make a Warrick episode, when they clearly still hate Gary Dourdan so much that they won't even call him back to film flashbacks. Or Dourdan won't allow them to use his image, who knows.
And that image of the Nice White Ladies taking the underprivileged African American kid away from his mom because her house was a little messy was really repellent. Are the writers that tone deaf that they didn't know how bad that made Sara and Finn look?
Next week a Finn episode? Oh joy.
Edited by Arjumand, Nov 19, 2012 @ 10:53 AM.
#15
Posted Nov 18, 2012 @ 12:12 PM
#16
Posted Nov 19, 2012 @ 4:42 AM
Shue really shouldn't have been in the episode ; thus was about the older characters.
I really didn't buy Tina's trip into cokeland or whatever her drug was.
#17
Posted Nov 19, 2012 @ 8:27 AM
Probably because he's a police dog and not a cadaver dog.
Fair enough (although I am not sure why a dog trained to find smells couldn't find the smell of a decomposing body), but they also had the dead guy's shoes. Let the dog smell those and then go find the owner. And even if that dog couldn't find dead bodies, after the episode where Nick got the dog, he should have been aware enough of the world of police dogs to know that a dog would be a better choice for that scene then Shue with the find a key thing.
#18
Posted Nov 21, 2012 @ 11:05 AM
I was kind of hoping Nick would end up with the kid. It could be a new running theme.Oh, I was also worried for a minute that our good guy Nick would take Warrick's kid in instead of having him sent to a foster family. But, he probably has his hands full with his new adopted canine buddy.
Got a police dog who's retiring and his handler is dead? Nick will take him.
Got a kid who's been taken away from his druggie parent by CPS? Nick will take him.
Unclaimed bodies, orphaned children? Nick will take them!
#19
Posted Nov 21, 2012 @ 4:02 PM
#20
Posted Nov 22, 2012 @ 3:51 AM
The house wasn't "a little messy", it was unsafe and practically unlivable. They found an unlabeled and open bottle of pills (oxy, wasn't it?) on the coffee table, a colony of roaches eating a sandwich on the floor that was covered by a paper plate, etc.And that image of the Nice White Ladies taking the underprivileged African American kid away from his mom because her house was a little messy was really repellent.
While it was a brutal scene, race had nothing to do with it. Swap the ethnicity of any/all of the characters in that scene and it would still play the same.
#21
Posted Nov 25, 2012 @ 7:10 PM
Glad the young guy who looked up to Warrick wasn't the one who committed the murders-- that would have been sad. .
#22
Posted Apr 10, 2013 @ 4:13 AM









