14-5: "Manhattan Vigil" 2012.10.24
#1
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 1:19 AM
#2
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 7:39 AM
300th episode. Does anyone know which episode the archival footage (of Olivia and Munch) came from?
Definitely from the first season. At first, I thought they were just editing scenes from first season into this one, but the conversation between Cragen and Munch in the flashback, nipped that theory in the bud.
I can't seem to recall which episode it was...and imdb is no help. Nothing clicked when I searched through the episode summaries.
Not sure how I feel about this one, though. Again, so sex crime, and so...why SVU?
#3
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 7:48 AM
To me he came across as more onstructive(if that's the word) than careful. When they were putting the pieces together he was absolutely adamant that the boys father took him in the original case, he wouldn't even consider the possibility, even when more similarities started showing up. Yeah, the two amcasea couldve been coincidence but at least investigate before shutting it down.I half expected him to start going 'lalala can't hear youu!!'. If they are trying to say he's wary of getting into trouble again, then that's understandable but it came off as over- stubbornness, especially in light of last weeks,' if they want to fire me, they know where to find me.'
In other news, yay Munch and Young!munch. Always a pleasure seeing him.
Olivia was really pretty back in the day wasn't she? I almost forgot that she had that length hair before she went short and fabulous. .
Love Rollins too, is she like the tech girl now? She seems to always have a laptop in her hands giving information on case of the week.
Fin: was there.
Amaro: snore....
#4
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 8:31 AM
The episode itself I thought was very well-done, very tense, and my heart broke for Hector's mother. The actress did a wonderful job. I love seeing Nick and Liv partnered up again, and everyone got a fairly equal part of the spotlight. I'm really happy that they're using Munch more this season. His character's great, and he was in it very little last year so these episodes are really the first chance I've had to see him in action. Oh, and Tom Sizemore was a great bad guy. I know who he is, and I remember hearing about all his personal troubles, but I haven't really seen him in much. Excellent actor.
#5
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 9:44 AM
When it came to the acting choices of Hamish (as Wyatt's father) and Mili Avital (as Wyatt's mother) I experienced a range of finding them interesting to strange to funny. They really took these acting parts seriously.
When I read the credits, it was really obvious that Tom Sizemore was going to be the suspect. Oh well.
Edited by Bunny LaJoya, Oct 25, 2012 @ 9:47 AM.
#6
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 10:24 AM
#7
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 10:56 AM
Granted, I don't remember this case at all from the first season, and I've watched the first season episodes at least three times, though it's been awhile since the last rewatch.
#8
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 11:43 AM
Edited by natalie wood, Oct 25, 2012 @ 11:44 AM.
#9
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 11:47 AM
Alex would have been the prosecuting attorney then.
Nope. Stephanie March didn't joint the show until Season 2. Season one didn't have an ADA. We saw Angie Harmon's Abby Carmichael, and a couple of other rotating ADAs.
I think they should just remove the SVU from this show, because clearly, it seems this unit can do any and all kinds of cases. I don't ever recall this unit being filled with so many detectives before. And when I say that, I mean, the precinct was bursting with cops. Isnt' this supposed to be an Elite unit, with only a chosen few?
It doesn't resemble SVU in any shape or form--with the looong cold opens, and that moaning/groaning music that is more Criminal Intent than SVU or even the mothership.
#10
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 12:01 PM
I did like the story (aside from the crapping all over season one). I actually cried for Hector's mom and was worried for Wyatt. It's been a long time since this show made me feel anything but embarrassment for it.
#11
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 12:39 PM
I don't understand why Olivia couldn't just say she was working with Elliot back then. No, she had to say she was a newbie and "we all" worked on it. Who all?
#12
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 12:53 PM
You have a terrific memory. I had totally forgotten that. I loved SM's Alex so of course I would think it was her. Although AH's Carmichael was a hard ass so I liked her, too. I always liked the hard ass ADAs esp on SVU b/c the crimes they investigate are heinous. Being a mother I'd want the ADA to be a freakin pit bull.
On a truly superficial level MH looked great in those flashbacks.
Edited by natalie wood, Oct 25, 2012 @ 1:22 PM.
#13
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 12:59 PM
It doesn't resemble SVU in any shape or form--with the looong cold opens, and that moaning/groaning music that is more Criminal Intent than SVU or even the mothership.
This, especially the last 2 minutes or so with the happy music when the kid was reunited with his parents and also the vigil scene afterwards.
I don't remember which episode it was. The second flashback scene is from Nocturne. Munch was watching footage of the pedophile piano teacher abuse student after student.
I recognized that episode right away, which left me confused. Also knew the other 1st season clips, but couldn't place them until you reminded me.
Why couldn't Olivia just say "my old/former partner"? Oh well.
#14
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 6:56 PM
ETA: absolutely no mention or kudos for that poor noncop who figured it all out - I thought he was a darling for doing it.
Edited by MurlocGurgle, Oct 25, 2012 @ 6:56 PM.
#15
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 7:37 PM
I think they just re-dubbed whatever conversation Cragen and Munch actually had at the time. I noticed when Munch specifically referenced the case from 1999 in the flashback, they only showed the back of his head, so you wouldn't be able to tell he was really talking about something else.Definitely from the first season. At first, I thought they were just editing scenes from first season into this one, but the conversation between Cragen and Munch in the flashback, nipped that theory in the bud.
Seriously. It's a shame whatever she's done to herself, because the way she looks now has zero to do with her simply aging.On a truly superficial level MH looked great in those flashbacks.
I thought it was a good episode. There was some real emotion, a decent storyline. I'd say the only weakness were the flashbacks. They were unnecessary, and I felt like they could have had the same storyline without actually needing to see the younger version of the characters dealing with the case.
#16
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 7:54 PM
My favorite line of the night (heck, of the whole one-plus seasons I've been watching), from Amaro in the cold case storage room: "There's something to be said about working Cold Case..." Nice nod to Danny Pino's signature role.
LOVED the Cold Case shout out! Weeee!!!
So Tom Sizemore molested the other kids, but didn't molest Wyatt?
#17
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 8:31 PM
Hector's mother was great and I really felt for her. Wyatt's parents, not so much.
#18
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 9:38 PM
I thought not mentioning Elliott was weird enough to be seriously distracting. You can mention the guy's name, people.
So glad they found Wyatt alive.
Edited by OUCellogal, Oct 25, 2012 @ 9:40 PM.
#19
Posted Oct 25, 2012 @ 11:31 PM
#20
Posted Oct 26, 2012 @ 5:29 PM
I remembered right away that Olivia was looking up at her 'father' in the window.
#21
Posted Oct 27, 2012 @ 9:23 AM
Same here, I immediately remembered that. That was such a soul-crushing moment and Belzer was so good. Ah, old school SVU, making us experience powerful emotions.I immediately recognized the Munch flashback because I remembered that line, "I got two more tapes to watch." It was one of Belzer's best acting moments.
That said, who am I kidding, I still enjoy the show. I was a big fan of Criminal Intent as well so the shift in tone doesn't bother me. I do agree that it doesn't quite feel like SVU but still, in my opinion, the show in its current state is more enjoyable than the more out there "monkey in the basketball"/"that's not an objection you're raising" last couple of seasons before Stabler left. Even though some of those episodes were freakin' hilarious.
I liked the edited moments from the first season, firstly because it was awesome to see young Olivia and younger Munch again but also because I found the closing moment with young Olivia quite impactful. There she was, back in 1999, holding the picture of that kid, and we knew that she wouldn't get an answer for 13 years. I liked that moment not in an emotional way, more like in the way I felt when I watched The Constant (the Lost episode). It was cool.
Well, I only watched Cold Case casually but I must say that every single time I watched a CC episode I found myself weeping at the closing montage. Every. single. time. Without fail. It was the music, I think. And the fact someone was always dead. This episode's closing moments with the family didn't quiiiiiite succeed at tugging at my heartstrings (all I could think of was how smooshed people's faces were getting).I'm almost positive the music at the beginning and the end was another Cold Case shoutout; that show always began its episodes with a flashback (featuring music from the time period du jour) and ended with a musical montage showing the various key players being all thoughtful and reflective. YMMV as to whether or not that worked, and ditto with the flashbacks.
No kidding. I love both actors but come on. Linklater looked good with shorter hair though.When it came to the acting choices of Hamish (as Wyatt's father) and Mili Avital (as Wyatt's mother) I experienced a range of finding them interesting to strange to funny. They really took these acting parts seriously.
I've always thought he's an amazing actor and he delivered yet again in this episode. It really sucks that he's had all these issues to work through because he could have been one of the greats, in my opinion. I've always thought he stole Heat right from under Pacino and De Niro's noses.Oh, and Tom Sizemore was a great bad guy. I know who he is, and I remember hearing about all his personal troubles, but I haven't really seen him in much. Excellent actor.
#22
Posted Oct 27, 2012 @ 1:43 PM
Edited by MurlocGurgle, Oct 27, 2012 @ 1:44 PM.
#23
Posted Oct 27, 2012 @ 9:21 PM
#24
Posted Oct 27, 2012 @ 11:58 PM
Nocturne. The piano teacher liked to tape his 'lessons'.From which episode is the 'I still got two more tapes to watch' quote?
#25
Posted Oct 28, 2012 @ 1:58 PM
There was some fancy editing and dubbing over original photos and dialogue--and for that, I think they suck big time. Leave season one alone! Re-writing history to serve your story line is just lazy writing.
They didn't re-write history. It's not like they used major retconning to make a plot work, they just created a new case, I think it is safe to say the show doesn't depict absolutely everything the detectives are working on. And lazy writing? I thought it was a clever way to mark the 300th episode, and getting the old footage to work so seamlessly must have been a bitch.
#26
Posted Oct 29, 2012 @ 2:19 AM
#27
Posted Oct 29, 2012 @ 10:51 PM
#28
Posted Nov 1, 2012 @ 5:55 AM
#29
Posted Nov 4, 2012 @ 10:05 PM
They didn't re-write history. It's not like they used major retconning to make a plot work, they just created a new case, I think it is safe to say the show doesn't depict absolutely everything the detectives are working on. And lazy writing? I thought it was a clever way to mark the 300th episode, and getting the old footage to work so seamlessly must have been a bitch.
I could not disagree more. Those moments they chose to repurpose from season one weren't throw-away moments. They meant something to the storyline and the characters that lived them. It is re-writing history, and as a dedicated watcher since the beginning, I find it offensive. Liv's quest for her father in that episode, and subsequent conversation with Elliot, shed light on her character and their partnership. Now it didn't happen? Munch's disgust watching those tapes in season one gave us insight into who the man is. The last scene with Liv staying up all night depicted how dedicated she was to the actual victim of that particular case--a young girl murdered by her boyfriend. Why erase all that? Why have those moments now belong to something else?
Edited by Gatesgirl, Nov 4, 2012 @ 10:17 PM.
#30
Posted Nov 5, 2012 @ 7:55 AM
Why erase all that? Why have those moments now belong to something else?
Because Warren Leight is a fucking hack and most of his writing before he became showrunner of CI were almost always co-written by Rene Balcer--and it was the latter's contribution, that made the episodes so riveting.
At this point, I don't know why they didn't just cancel SVU and say, hey! We've got Leight back, so Criminal Intent is being resurrected, even though it did the worst in the ratings between the three shows. And I say this as someone who really enjoyed the first six/seven years of Criminal Intent.









