Ideas For Future Olympics: Three-Legged Race?
#1
Posted Jul 29, 2012 @ 9:36 PM
Firstly, and most importantly, a single feed for all countries speaking a particular language, with a shared pool of commentators. No more of this shit with NBC cutting out the 7/7 memorial because it doesn't impact Americans, or Australians cutting back to their dancing athletes continuously during the OC and missing several BIG countries marching as a result, or ignoring entire sports.
Secondly, legible country name signs at the opening ceremony. At what point did "make them as impossible to read on television as possible" become the design brief? The last time they were even remotely good was in Sydney, and there they were just black writing on a piece of white cardboard.
#2
Posted Jul 29, 2012 @ 9:44 PM
Secondly, legible country name signs at the opening ceremony. At what point did "make them as impossible to read on television as possible" become the design brief? The last time they were even remotely good was in Sydney, and there they were just black writing on a piece of white cardboard.
The worst ones I ever saw was in Athens. They had this like, 4 sided signs that were impossible to read.
I would like NBC to stop showing the gymnasts just standing around when other gymnasts are competing. Nothing more annoying then hearing someone else competing yet looking at a bunch of girls just standing there.
#3
Posted Jul 29, 2012 @ 9:47 PM
#4
Posted Jul 29, 2012 @ 10:11 PM
#5
Posted Jul 29, 2012 @ 10:23 PM
#6
Posted Jul 29, 2012 @ 10:26 PM
#7
Posted Jul 29, 2012 @ 10:51 PM
I'd also nix a couple events out. They keep adding and adding. (and taking away some sports that make no sense). Sailing, would be one of them.
#8
Posted Jul 29, 2012 @ 11:26 PM
#9
Posted Jul 29, 2012 @ 11:33 PM
#10
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 12:25 AM
#11
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 12:35 AM
Too bad a Sasuke (Ninja Warrior) style obstacle course will never be an Olympic sport.
#12
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 2:10 AM
#13
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 2:14 AM
Edited by legaleagle44, Jul 30, 2012 @ 2:15 AM.
#14
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 2:20 AM
If I was removing events, I'd rip out anything that involves synchronization. I just don't see the need to synchronize your aquatic activities. And while we're at it, why are there four strokes in swimming? That would be like having backwards running, hopping, and skipping as alternate forms of running.
#15
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 2:36 AM
Because each stroke is unique and uses a different technique (in terms of stroking, kicking, and breathing) and a different set of muscles -- and some of them are damn hard to master (I can only do freestyle, backstroke, and one non-racing stroke that's known as the elementary backstroke, I've never learned butterfly, and while I've tried to teach myself breast stroke, it takes a lot more coordination than I'm blessed with.) It's not as simple as calling each stroke a mere variation of the freestyle. Besides, wouldn't you get tired of seeing only freestyle races?And while we're at it, why are there four strokes in swimming? That would be like having backwards running, hopping, and skipping as alternate forms of running.
#16
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 3:08 AM
DanceSport, definitely. I've been waiting for more than 20 years for ballroom dancing to become to the Summer Games what figure skating is to the Winter Games. There'd be some top-notch competition, too -- from (not necessarily in this order) the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, Russia, and Japan especially.
THIS! So much of THIS. I'm a huge advocate for adding DanceSport (aka Ballroom Dancing) to the Olympics and I hope it can eventually pave the way for many forms of dance though the other forms would be much more difficult to standardize than DanceSport which already has rules and regulations. As a dancer it really hurts me that no one gives dance the time of day when I watch figure skating and rhythmic gymnastics in the Olympics.
I also think they should add acrobatic gymnastics because I was watching some videos and it's absolutely amazing. I actually can't believe the put trampoline in over this.
And last, but not least, I'd like them to add pole dancing. Real pole dancing not stripping. It's actually really amazing and artistic plus it requires so much strength and flexibility. I think it'd be a great addition.
#17
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 3:58 AM
Edited by Nell Huxleigh, Jul 30, 2012 @ 4:07 AM.
#18
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 4:41 AM
I guess my point is I'm tired of seeing endless amounts of swimming races. And I appreciate that the strokes have differences, but swimmers are hauling in multiple medals, which seems grossly out of proportion to how many medals a basketball player can win.Besides, wouldn't you get tired of seeing only freestyle races?
#19
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 4:57 AM
1. If there's any need for another Independent Olympic Athletes delegation, either put them in what would be their actual positions if they had a NOC, put them back between Zimbabwe and the host country where Timor-Leste was in 2000, or put them between Greece and... Afghanistan? Are they first normally? Though it made more sense in terms of tradition, it seemed odd to have them march under I in the middle of the parade.
2. Hire announcers who can give the announcements gravitas. I liked that the male and female announcers alternated English and French names this time (I don't believe they've ever done it before), but the female announcer in particular sounded pissed a lot of the time. It should practically be a rule for announcers to watch Sydney's parade of nations in order to get the tone right. Announce the teams. Don't play favourites. (Oh, Olympics when the commentary was tolerable. How I miss thee.)
Edited by SnideAsides, Jul 30, 2012 @ 5:04 AM.
#20
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 7:55 AM
I wouldn't necessarily have a problem with this if it didn't mean the US media shoving it down my throats that Phelps is going to be THE. MOST. DECORATED. OLYMPIAN. EVER. Yay him? I mean, saying that he's an excellent athlete is an understatement, but at the same time, he gets a lot more opportunities to win medals than athletes in some other sports.And I appreciate that the strokes have differences, but swimmers are hauling in multiple medals, which seems grossly out of proportion to how many medals a basketball player can win.
#21
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 8:48 AM
I also think they should add acrobatic gymnastics because I was watching some videos and it's absolutely amazing.
That is pretty amazing. Reminds me a little bit of the competition cheerleading my daughter does, which combines some of the figures the acrobats do, with the floor tumbling passes of gymnastics.
#22
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 8:59 AM
#23
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 10:36 AM
That would be a logistical nightmare, in my opinion. How would you coordinate transportation and coverage among three locations that would be that far apart geographically? And "Midwest Olympics" doesn't have anywhere near the cachet of "Chicago Olympics" -- to say nothing of the fact that most people outside of the United States wouldn't have the slightest idea of where you were talking about.Instead of one city hosting, they could have the games hosted by a country or a region so that one city won't be risking bankruptcy. For example, instead of Chicago hosting, it would be a "Midwest Olympics" with the main competition centers in Chicago, Milwaukee, and Minneapolis/St. Paul. They already spread out competitions to places that the host city doesn't have the resources for, like when the boat-related sports for Atlanta were done in North Carolina.
Edited by legaleagle44, Jul 30, 2012 @ 10:36 AM.
#24
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 11:18 AM
tip and fall:
And I appreciate that the strokes have differences, but swimmers are hauling in multiple medals, which seems grossly out of proportion to how many medals a basketball player can win.
I wouldn't necessarily have a problem with this if it didn't mean the US media shoving it down my throats that Phelps is going to be THE. MOST. DECORATED. OLYMPIAN. EVER. Yay him? I mean, saying that he's an excellent athlete is an understatement, but at the same time, he gets a lot more opportunities to win medals than athletes in some other sports.
I agree with the both of you completely. While I do not want to diminish Phelps's achievements, let us look it from another angle. Look at all the martial artists. I do think that they train and practice as much and as hard (if not more) as Phelps does. In terms of talent, who is to say that Phelps is better than them? Yet, the best of the best athlete in martial arts only has the opportunity to one medal in each Olympic. Therefore, if there was a very dominating martial artist and he went to the Olympics where Phelps went, he could only get 3 golds.
A bit off, listen to what Ronda Rousey has to say about Michael Phelps at 3:30 mark.
#25
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 12:20 PM
They could split up the sports between cities depending on what facilities are available to minimize travel between them. A regional hosting might not have the name recognition of a city, but how famous were places like Lilyhammer, Nagano, and Sochi before they hosted? It's not glamorous, but I think it's a viable option to deal with the high costs.Instead of one city hosting, they could have the games hosted by a country or a region so that one city won't be risking bankruptcy. For example, instead of Chicago hosting, it would be a "Midwest Olympics" with the main competition centers in Chicago, Milwaukee, and Minneapolis/St. Paul. They already spread out competitions to places that the host city doesn't have the resources for, like when the boat-related sports for Atlanta were done in North Carolina.
That would be a logistical nightmare, in my opinion. How would you coordinate transportation and coverage among three locations that would be that far apart geographically? And "Midwest Olympics" doesn't have anywhere near the cachet of "Chicago Olympics" -- to say nothing of the fact that most people outside of the United States wouldn't have the slightest idea of where you were talking about.
#26
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 12:23 PM
#27
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 6:38 PM
#28
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 7:51 PM
And I appreciate that the strokes have differences, but swimmers are hauling in multiple medals, which seems grossly out of proportion to how many medals a basketball player can win.
I wouldn't mind them adding street basketball as an event. It might require another outdoor venue, but it's no different than them having separate events and venues for volleyball and beach volleyball.
#29
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 11:47 PM
I've seen ballroom/DanceSport, they used to show it on PBS all the time. It's cool, and it sure looks tough to do well, but I don't have any interest in seeing it in the Olympics. There are already too many sports that rely on judgement calls and anything that leans too heavily on qualitative judgements of performance rather than qualitative is questionable as an (Olympic) sport, IMO. DanceSport at least is already codified, but I think other forms of dance would be moving way too far into questionable territory.
What's wrong with leaving dance as an art form, with its own values and standards? Why does it have to be shoehorned into a codified, Olympic-style competition? Really, I think that would be potentially quite stunting for dance. I don't think that saying it isn't right for the Olympics makes it a less worthy pursuit than, say, javelin. It just makes it different.
And seriously, pole dancing? Maybe we could also have jazzercise and aerial yoga and whatever other fitness trend is cool lately. I would rather they bring back the sculpture competition, honestly.
On another note, men's soccer definitely has to go. I'm a huge soccer fan, but the men's tournament is just silly, there are SO many other top venues for competition. I wouldn't really be sad to see tennis go either, and I think bringing in golf is going to be lame too.
Tug of war would be badass though. They could do a team event and/or individual.
Edited by TWoP Howard, Jul 31, 2012 @ 11:37 PM.
Quoted post was deleted
#30
Posted Jul 30, 2012 @ 11:49 PM
Also, cornhole.Since Badminton is an Olympic sport why not Horse Shoes?









