Mod Q&A: The Editor in Chief
Posted Jun 23, 2012 @ 11:05 AM
Just remember the format should be:
Not the other way around. (But I can fix that if you mess up.)
Posted Jun 24, 2012 @ 1:44 PM
I know there's going to be so much to talk about both "Sorkin's Women" but also how he manages to use male pronouns when proclaiming the greatness of an industry.
Posted Jun 26, 2012 @ 6:33 PM
For what it's worth, I thought the recaplet was fine. I don't think a recapper needs special experience to tap this show, just a sense of humor.
Posted Jun 27, 2012 @ 12:03 AM
Please don't discuss the recapper here (I've deleted some previous posts about it). If you have a problem with the recapper, email editorial or the recapper. Or keep them to yourself.
Edited by TWoP Mars, Jun 27, 2012 @ 12:03 AM.
Posted Jun 27, 2012 @ 11:13 AM
Just read post above so am going to start thread
Edited by No Second Troy, Jun 27, 2012 @ 11:16 AM.
Posted Jul 4, 2012 @ 5:56 PM
Nitpicks and criticisms: This is what blowing it looks like
Sorry about that and thank you very much.
Posted Jul 5, 2012 @ 9:54 AM
Posted Jul 9, 2012 @ 1:22 PM
Posted Jul 10, 2012 @ 12:13 AM
Posted Jul 10, 2012 @ 5:57 AM
Thanks for any help.
Posted Jul 10, 2012 @ 11:23 PM
Recycling characters: Isaac, you look pale
Charlie Skinner (Sam Waterston) is so completely modeled on Isaac on Sports Night (Robert Guillaume). Slow talking. Alcohol-dependent. Boss who is always protecting the integrity of the show from the suits higher up who want something different. The wise voice of reason. Et cetera.
Surely there are other parallels between Sorkin's old characters on West Wing, Studio 60, and his movies.
Posted Jul 11, 2012 @ 2:10 PM
Posted Jul 12, 2012 @ 1:14 AM
Posted Aug 3, 2012 @ 9:32 AM
Posted Aug 4, 2012 @ 1:41 PM
Posted Apr 23, 2013 @ 12:58 PM
Posted Aug 9, 2013 @ 2:43 PM
You've got duplicate threads for 2-4 Unintended Consequences.