The Choice: Setting Women Back Thirty Years
#1
Posted Jun 7, 2012 @ 11:23 PM
I cannot believe how cringe-worthy this show is. Women try to get four guys (two I've never heard of, two I've barely heard of) to turn their chairs around (ala The Voice) by talking up their best attributes.
I have to admit, I'm fascinated. Who would do this?
#2
Posted Jun 7, 2012 @ 11:37 PM
The other day I joked with my friends about how the show originally had a male host, but Joe Jonas kept pulling his lever every time the guy got up on stage to introduce the next contestant so they had to hire Cat Deeley instead.
#3
Posted Jun 8, 2012 @ 2:23 AM
#4
Posted Jun 8, 2012 @ 2:46 AM
I don't know the rules because I missed the beginning, but I wonder - are there enough "(celebrity) eligible bachelors" with crappy agents to sustain a season? Maybe the dreamboats appear on more than one episode?
Oh God, I'm putting way too much thought into this. Need.sleep.
#5
Posted Jun 8, 2012 @ 6:46 AM
#6
Posted Jun 8, 2012 @ 7:12 AM
#7
Posted Jun 8, 2012 @ 8:24 AM
#8
Posted Jun 8, 2012 @ 9:14 AM
I will of course watch, it takes all kinds to make the world go round. I am also watching because I want my sister and future daughters to know how NOT to behave as a woman. I like Romeo, so that's another reason to watch. I also LOVE a good train wreck and HAM's (hot ass messes).
#9
Posted Jun 8, 2012 @ 11:22 AM
#10
Posted Jun 8, 2012 @ 11:39 AM
I agree Take me Out was entertaining in a horrific car wreck way. But the women on this show seemed to have a 1/4 chance (factoring in that a couple of women weren't chosen by anyone) of getting a date with a (minor) celebrity. It was lame and dull, be at least some of the contestents might get a nice dinner out of it.I thought this show wasn't nearly as entertaining as "Take me Out" at all
On Take Me Out: 30 women vieing for a chance to date 1) the trainer who hunts his own meat and is obsessive about food to the point where all sweets are banned, 2) Drummer from Stomp with the bi-coloured mohawk and covered in tattoos, 3) Mr. Vegas who stripped to his skivvies and "performed" and 4) Cute Italian boxer (wait - how'd he end up on this show... must be the language issue)
Plus Cat Deeley is a far superior host to George Lopez.
#11
Posted Jun 8, 2012 @ 11:50 AM
Cat Deely being there at first mystified me, but then I remembered how non-challant they tend to be about "presenting gigs" in the UK. Work is work for folks from her background, and while I'm sure she feels lucky to normally be on a show like SYTYCD, picking up the pick and shovel and doing some piece of fluff for some nice extra cashola is not going to make her lose any sleep at night. If any of this comes off as demeaning to her, she's too practical to dwell on it, I think. She manages to make even this show about 15% less terrible than it might otherwise be, but of course its STILL pretty terrible.
Won't watch again, but won't lose any sleep either if it somehow stays on the air (doubtful).
#12
Posted Jun 8, 2012 @ 1:23 PM
Not as disturbing as the plastic surgery competition shows, but a giant dose of boring to accompany the sexism.
Edited by 6feetover, Jun 8, 2012 @ 1:24 PM.
#13
Posted Jun 8, 2012 @ 2:50 PM
Having said that, you know they got me me when they told me to tune in next week to see how the dates went. It's not funny cause I'm invested!
#14
Posted Jun 8, 2012 @ 4:10 PM
#16
Posted Jun 8, 2012 @ 8:40 PM
Okay, so the girl gets a chance of getting married, but no sex.
--Tyson Beckford?
Not so bad. He's only a "star" in a specialized area, but I can see him being truly appealing to the famewhores... er female contestants.
--Taylor Hicks?
Oh come on now. Is this a joke? No? They're SERIOUS?
--Rocco Dispirito?
Ew. Slimy.
--Rob Kardashian?
Ew. Also slimy.
--Warren Sapp?
Um. I guess. But isn't he like... 50 years old? I guess old guys need famewhore lovin too!
As for Hope Dworaczyk and Carmen Electra? I guessed they'd eventually get around to a gender switch. Those are probably as good choices as anyone. A playboy bunny and a woman who's also been in Playboy. Original!
#17
Posted Jun 9, 2012 @ 2:01 AM
I think Ryan Shay would be all over this!NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Ryan Shay!!! Noooo!!!
#18
Posted Jun 9, 2012 @ 9:59 PM
Oh, Cat Deeley. You're too good for this crap
Too true. But bless her heart, she is being a total professional and a consummate host, rather than simply using the gig to do more of the same old tired schtick. Jenny McCarthy and George Lopez, I'm looking in your respective directions!
Edited by reggiejax, Jun 9, 2012 @ 10:00 PM.
#19
Posted Jun 13, 2012 @ 7:30 PM
#20
Posted Jun 13, 2012 @ 10:41 PM
Here is a list of all the "celebs" and all I have to say is NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Ryan Shay!!! Noooo!!!
In a way, even if not the most prominent, that's the most surprising name on the list. Either his agent is terrible, or he was offered something for next pilot season.
My problem with the show isn't that it's trashy or that it's anti-feminist (No men watch these shows.) But that it's boring. The fun of a dating game show is the double entendre interaction between the potential dates and there's too little of that.
#21
Posted Jun 15, 2012 @ 12:52 PM
Exactly. I just watched the second show (why, I have no idea because I just wanted to sit?) and after a while all the girls seem the same, the questions are the same and trite. The radio host guy on last night seemed to be having some fun with it but the others just looked kind of embarassed even to be there. The athletes are completely wooden. Maybe if everyone was an aspiring stand-up comic or something?My problem with the show isn't that it's trashy or that it's anti-feminist (No men watch these shows.) But that it's boring. The fun of a dating game show is the double entendre interaction between the potential dates and there's too little of that.
#22
Posted Jun 16, 2012 @ 12:34 AM
#23
Posted Jun 27, 2012 @ 6:40 PM
As silly as it is, I don't see how this format will work with women in the seat. In my experience, men are visual and unless you're a donkey from Hell's Kitchen, all it really takes is a short skirt, heels, and some makeup to get the initial attention of America's most eligible celebrity bachelors. As long as they're not overweight, even the most unattractive of women (by entertainment standards) can pull off cute, sexy, or whatever the bachelors are looking for.
Women on the other hand, tend to gravitate towards confidence and power. How can a man exude those qualities or talk himself up without sounding like he's overcompensating for something?
From what I've seen, the bachelor gauges the audience reaction before he starts listening to the mystery woman.
A man is going to have to take off his shirt or be damn good looking (or both) for the audience to have a similar reaction to that of a woman.
#24
Posted Jun 29, 2012 @ 7:18 AM
Edited by Stalkmylife82, Jun 29, 2012 @ 11:05 AM.
#25
Posted Jun 29, 2012 @ 8:07 AM
Rocco DiSpirito, Warren Sapp, and Taylor Hicks? This show jumped the shark on the 2nd episode. I agree with the poster who said this show is like watching a SNL parody of a dating show. Cat is too good for this show. Nick Lachey must have been busy.
#26
Posted Jun 29, 2012 @ 2:45 PM
#27
Posted Jun 29, 2012 @ 3:01 PM
#28
Posted Jun 29, 2012 @ 11:13 PM
Or maybe I was just too blinded by the stunning hotness of Carmen's pick to make an accurate assessment.
#29
Posted Jul 8, 2012 @ 1:29 AM
My problem with the show isn't that it's trashy or that it's anti-feminist (No men watch these shows.)
Women can be just as anti-woman as men. Anti-feminism isn't sexist like that :)
I noticed the absences of sashes in the episode with female celebrities. WTF, why couldn't the male contestants be branded and claimed like property?









