Lana Parrilla as Evil Queen Regina: The Only Happy Ending Will Be Hers
#1
Posted Oct 26, 2011 @ 8:53 PM
She really seems to have an unhealthy obsession with apples, too. Maine is also absolutely horrible.
#2
Posted Nov 3, 2011 @ 3:02 PM
Gotta disagree with that assessment. Regina, the modern day incarnation of the Evil Queen, is just smoking hot. Way hotter than Snow. That mirror sold her a bill of goods.But what can one expect from someone who killed a girl just because she was prettier than her?
Edited by Rum Punch, Nov 4, 2011 @ 11:44 AM.
#3
Posted Nov 3, 2011 @ 10:00 PM
#4
Posted Nov 4, 2011 @ 5:07 PM
#5
Posted Nov 5, 2011 @ 1:06 AM
So the problem is that every time she interacts with Henry, he rips the poor woman a new asshole, telling her to her face what a bitch and lousy mother she is. So far, Henry is coming off looking like the abusive one, and I find myself sympathizing with Regina, the poor mother who has to put up with such a hateful ingrate of a kid.
Edited by bmills, Nov 5, 2011 @ 1:07 AM.
#6
Posted Nov 5, 2011 @ 9:38 AM
Edited by DollEyes, Nov 5, 2011 @ 9:39 AM.
#7
Posted Nov 5, 2011 @ 1:29 PM
#8
Posted Nov 5, 2011 @ 5:13 PM
She may be one of the most beautiful women on tv...and that's no hyperbole...
She is beautiful. But her forehead looks botoxed to the point where she can't even scowl effectively.
I'm loving having two women with storylines on a tv show though.
#9
Posted Nov 6, 2011 @ 1:45 PM
Oh, I get that the character is evil, but what I'm complaining about is the "don't tell me, show me" principle of screenwriting. What we are told is that Regina is an uncaring mother, but what we see is a poor woman who's been mercilessly berated by the spiteful little creep she's been taking care of for years. If they want me to believe that Regina is a nasty mom, then show her being nasty to the kid. Otherwise, I'm just going to sympathize with her over the kid who just spits vitriol every chance he gets for no apparent reason.
Ah, but that's not all we've seen of Regina, re the first point. She is no "poor victim" by a long shot. The book gives Henry plenty of good reasons to hate Regina. Besides Emma and Mr. Gold, Henry is the only person in town who's not fooled by Regina. If Regina is willing to kill her father to get her way, then what would she do to Henry if push came to shove? Just because Regina hasn't been a complete bitch to Henry yet, that doesn't mean she never will be.
#10
Posted Nov 6, 2011 @ 2:02 PM
What I'm curious about is if he felt this way about her before reading the book. (I had the impression he did, since Regina doesn't act like it's some sudden personality change) Because she hasn't done anything we are aware of to make Henry hate her. So is his hate based on the fact that he believes (rightly) that she is the Evil Queen from his book? Did he love her before that? I just can't see anything other than the book that would give Henry reason to hate her as much as he seems to.Ah, but that's not all we've seen of Regina, re the first point. She is no "poor victim" by a long shot. The book gives Henry plenty of good reasons to hate Regina. Besides Emma and Mr. Gold, Henry is the only person in town who's not fooled by Regina. If Regina is willing to kill her father to get her way, then what would she do to Henry if push came to shove? Just because Regina hasn't been a complete bitch to Henry yet, that doesn't mean she never will be.
If I didn't know how this show was going to end up I'd be really interested to see the whole book thing be Henry's overactive imagination, that the people in his town aren't really fairytale people and that the mother he now hates never killed her father and was never anything more than a rather demanding mayor.
Edited by Houddy, Nov 6, 2011 @ 2:03 PM.
#11
Posted Nov 6, 2011 @ 7:05 PM
It was still an emotionally abusive action, though. This isn't the only time she was "cruel to be kind." She did make a comment to Mary Margaret about Henry having to face reality. She also pulled Henry from his class to tell him about Emma being arrested. I'd wonder what kind of mother would tell her child about an upsetting action at that exact time. It couldn't have waited until he got home, and she could comfort him. Telling him in public seemed pretty damn insensitive. Regina's main abuse of Henry has got to be emotional. Since she can't truly love him, she can't really be a "good" mother to Henry.She did let Henry overhear a hurtful comment from Emma ('he's crazy")
Last, but not least, the conversation she had with Emma at the end of the pilot has just stuck with me. Regina tells Emma that she wasn't there to change every diaper, soothe the fevers, and endure the tantrums. Regina only said the negative things about raising a child. She never said anything about the positives. That just left me with an unsettled feeling.
Besides, if the show hasn't shown any overt abuse or neglect, it hasn't seemed to show any true, loving actions.
Regina is evil, and she knows her past, unlike everyone else. She tells Henry how him believing her to be an evil queen hurts her. Except she knows she was the evil queen.
Besides, the curse guaranteed the only happy ending would be hers. She probably should have included "my children will also have happy endings" in the fine print.
#12
Posted Nov 6, 2011 @ 7:26 PM
Thank you. I knew there was something off about that, in addition to her so suddenly and viciously attacking the person who kindly kept returning her wandering child, but I couldn't place it. That was it. No mention of any of the multitude of joyous firsts - first step, first strawberry, school play, soccer game, moment of reading on his own, and so on and on... nothing. Not one.Last, but not least, the conversation she had with Emma at the end of the pilot has just stuck with me. Regina tells Emma that she wasn't there to change every diaper, soothe the fevers, and endure the tantrums. Regina only said the negative things about raising a child. She never said anything about the positives. That just left me with an unsettled feeling.
If she remembers diapers and tantrums, why would these not matter at least equally? The only answer that comes to mind is that she didn't care about any of it, only noticing what inconvenienced her. Which fits with her current behavior. Not one word about how smart, how resourceful, how brave, how hopelessly, painfully honest her child is. All that matters is he's hers. Like the tree, except I think she likes the tree better.
I also agree that she does remember. I don't think an excess of magic blew back on her or something like that. Which begs the question why she'd adopt a child at all, knowing as she does that she contains a void that can never be filled, a void where her soul, however paltry it may have been, once lived and now is no more. It seems like it should have occurred to her that this would mean she could never have a happy ending, either, because she can't be happy. Perhaps she thought a child might somehow change that?
Or perhaps Mr. Gold said "please."
Edited by HelenBack, Nov 6, 2011 @ 7:27 PM.
#13
Posted Nov 6, 2011 @ 11:20 PM
Nothing else to really except that Lana Parrilla is awesome in this role. And is insanely gorgeous.
#14
Posted Nov 6, 2011 @ 11:45 PM
#15
Posted Nov 7, 2011 @ 12:57 AM
#16
Posted Nov 7, 2011 @ 1:23 AM
#17
Posted Nov 7, 2011 @ 1:58 AM
Or maybe 34's a "publicist age." She sure is beautiful, whatever her age. And is KILLING this part! In the very best way.
#18
Posted Nov 7, 2011 @ 2:04 AM
Then again, maybe she thinks Henry will be more likely to love her if she isn't so hard on him.
#19
Posted Nov 7, 2011 @ 2:13 AM
I assume she's a smoker actually. Roughness of her voice, smokers lines on her face. Seems like most celebrities who didn't seem to age quite right either smoke(d) too much or tan(ned) too much or both.I read on Wikipedia that the actress is 34 years old... Am I the only one who does not feel that she could possibly be just one year older than Goodwin and two years older than Morrison? She's beautiful, but how does she look 10 years older than what she is?
I do think she doesn't keep very good tabs on Henry. But I suppose in general he's highly responsible intelligent, lives in a little town where everyone knows everyone so she doesn't expect him to exactly get into trouble. But I mean he managed to leave town, wanders the woods at night, runs off and hangs out with whomever he wants. If she really wanted him to stop running off, you'd think she'd hire a guard.
Edited by Aliasscape, Nov 7, 2011 @ 2:15 AM.
#20
Posted Nov 7, 2011 @ 6:56 AM
#21
Posted Nov 7, 2011 @ 7:18 AM
#22
Posted Nov 7, 2011 @ 7:24 AM
This is exactly why I can't buy that she is so horrible to Henry. My mother wasn't an evil queen but she was tough and I would never pull any of the shit Henry gets away with. So, yeah, I still don't see any reason for Henry to treat her like she's an evil queen other than because he read in a book that she was. And it just bugs, until they tell me that this is a development that happened only after Henry got the book and realized who Regina is, it's going to be a bad writing choice to me.I think she needs to hire one of her evil minions to babysit. "Henry escapes" could be its own drinking game at this point. Though apparently he doesn't find her threatening enough to watch his mouth or be discreet about what he's up to.
Actually, making it something that just started to happen would make more sense. Regina is supposed to be the only one with a happy ending. Having an insubordinate brat for a child isn't exactly a happy ending, is it? But if she had a great kid and then one day Mary M. gave him a book that showed him the truth and now all hell was breaking loose, that would make more sense to me.
#23
Posted Nov 7, 2011 @ 12:51 PM
Besides, if the show hasn't shown any overt abuse or neglect, it hasn't seemed to show any true, loving actions
This is exactly why I can't buy that she is so horrible to Henry. My mother wasn't an evil queen but she was tough and I would never pull any of the shit Henry gets away with. So, yeah, I still don't see any reason for Henry to treat her like she's an evil queen other than because he read in a book that she was. And it just bugs
But we don't need to see it (at least not right away -plenty of time for flashbacks later) because it has been made explicity clear in the earlier episodes that she. is. not. capable of it. She sacrificed that part of herself to cast the curse. Like a chipped but soul-lacking Spike on Buffy the Vampire Slayer, she is incapable of agape love.
And kids aren't stupid. They know when you are B.S.-ing them. She doesn't need to physically smack him to be a miserable, emotionally stunted, morale-devastating mother.
Edited by journeywoman, Nov 7, 2011 @ 12:51 PM.
#24
Posted Nov 7, 2011 @ 3:45 PM
#25
Posted Nov 7, 2011 @ 10:07 PM
This is exactly why I can't buy that she is so horrible to Henry. My mother wasn't an evil queen but she was tough and I would never pull any of the shit Henry gets away with. So, yeah, I still don't see any reason for Henry to treat her like she's an evil queen other than because he read in a book that she was. And it just bugs, until they tell me that this is a development that happened only after Henry got the book and realized who Regina is, it's going to be a bad writing choice to me.
I agree with others that having someone you know doesn't have a shred of love or real affection as your only parent can really mess you up even if they aren't exactly abusive. Children (and most people) can tell that sort of thing. It is sort of like an "at least they didn't hit you" or "at least you didn't starve" sort of thing. I mean that is just the base line. Henry gets away with stuff because the Queen doesn't really care about it him except when he is foiling her. Even if she does want to care about him.
Actually, making it something that just started to happen would make more sense. Regina is supposed to be the only one with a happy ending. Having an insubordinate brat for a child isn't exactly a happy ending, is it? But if she had a great kid and then one day Mary M. gave him a book that showed him the truth and now all hell was breaking loose, that would make more sense to me.
I don't think anything about the curse guaranteed her a happy ending. That is just what she thought and she was gauging happiness in terms of Snow White being miserable. Nothing else. In fact, it guaranteed that she wouldn't get one because she had to kill her father and abandon her soul for it to work.
#26
Posted Nov 7, 2011 @ 10:12 PM
Henry comes off as a spoiled brat who gets away with almost anything he wants. I agree it's now that he has the book that he's acting out and giving his mother lip.
#27
Posted Nov 7, 2011 @ 10:19 PM
In both her Evil Personas, LP actually puts me in mind of those gorgeous old school Hollywood screen sirens (circa 1940's or so). It's the overall combination of her sultry looks, smokey voice, not mention that slinky, predatory saunter of hers.Lana is stunning in this role! She is the Evil Queen. What a great villain. And when she's on the screen, I can't take my eyes off of her beautiful face.
I'm really enjoying her in this role. And, I have to echo the comment from someone over in the episode thread, who said that LP and RC had insanely hot chemistry in their dungeon scene. Because I know I was going, wow and...dang, while I watched it.
So, I really can't wait to see those two characters interacting again, for any reason, ASAP.
Edited by binturite, Nov 7, 2011 @ 10:20 PM.
#28
Posted Nov 8, 2011 @ 8:41 AM
I read on Wikipedia that the actress is 34 years old... Am I the only one who does not feel that she could possibly be just one year older than Goodwin and two years older than Morrison? She's beautiful, but how does she look 10 years older than what she is?
Yikes, I had her pegged in her early to mid 40s. She is one year younger than me but she looks significantly older. I hope that birth date is a typo, as how can someone that gorgeous look so much older than their years?
#29
Posted Nov 8, 2011 @ 10:13 AM
#30
Posted Nov 8, 2011 @ 4:13 PM
Not loving him is hardly the worst thing she could do. Sure, in this sugar fest it is but, by real life standards no way.
With all due respect Scrapper, I think this is the worst thing a mother could do (outside of murder), especially IRL. Unless you've experienced it or witnessed it, you can not begin to imagine the depth of despair experienced upon realizing that the one person who is supposed to love you unconditionally...simply does not, never has, and never will. It leaves a hole in the child, much like the hole that Regina now has and never will be able to fill.







