Uh, damn. Didn't see that coming.The third season concludes with Peter meeting his destiny head-on and the demise of a team member.
3-22: "The Day We Died" 2011.05.06 (recap)
#1
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:02 PM
#2
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:03 PM
The REAL glyph: N-O-M-O-R-E
The kid in the drawing was a red herring :P
Anyone guess the cliffhanger? I didn't see anyone who did.
Fringe did it again!!!
#3
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:03 PM
#4
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:04 PM
I was wondering why none of them seemed to notice that Peter just disappeared. It's gonna be a long summer!
Edited by wamboyil, May 6, 2011 @ 9:04 PM.
#5
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:05 PM
So Peter never existed? Oh, gods.
Edited by Whiteotter, May 6, 2011 @ 9:07 PM.
#6
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:05 PM
I don't want to live in any universe without a Peter Bishop.
#7
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:05 PM
Me too. I thought it was strange that Walter didn't freak out when Peter faded out.I was wondering why none of them seems to notice that Peter just disappeared
I'm so confused, haha.
#8
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:06 PM
So, the whole thing about the First People was just sending the machine back in time? Not about actual people inhabiting the Earth a gazillion years ago? Hmmm...
I hate hiatuses! :-(
#9
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:06 PM
No Peter, no me watching Fringe. I'm going to disappear like he did.
Edited by Catherineusa, May 6, 2011 @ 9:07 PM.
#10
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:07 PM
Does that mean Henry no longer exists (or is remembered) either?
#11
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:07 PM
#12
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:07 PM
But Peter being erased from existence? That's got me impatient already. At first, I thought he merely went back to the red universe because there was a vague image of a person in the red universe machine. Sigh . . .
Also, I'm wondering if it was intentional that Peter's future hairstyle resembles Sam Weiss', down to the gray areas.
Edited by GreenPhoenix, May 6, 2011 @ 9:08 PM.
#13
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:08 PM
#14
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:08 PM
Holy crap. Peter never existed, so no one remembers him. But time isn't linear and there's paradoxes and why does Walter think he went to the other side now if not for Peter and there's too many questions! I'm so confused.
Well done, Show. Well done.
#15
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:08 PM
Also, of course, if everyone forgets (both) Peter(s) permanently I will be unhappy. But I doubt it.
Also, did anyone feel like running out of the room when the Walters saw each other, like an incredibly awkward argument between a couple that you didn't want to witness yet did?
#16
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:08 PM
Have a nice summer, y'all!
#17
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:08 PM
New TV Rule: No JJ Abrams show is ever allowed to use time travel again. You hear me, Alcatraz?
#18
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:08 PM
He vanished out of space/time? I mean... huh? Why? He bridged the worlds - Ok. He got them together to try and fix things - Ok. But how does that make him just vanish? It wasn't some fanwank-able bit of paradoxical timey-wimey character respawn, it was just.. without reason. It makes the journey of the episode almost nonsensical, because they just jammed this last shocker in with no line of reasoning behind it.
#19
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:09 PM
The producers were really clever about teasing things in a way that let us think we might have an idea what to expect, but I didn't quite see that coming. Not that I'm sure exactly what happened. Because for all the questions that got answered, I've got about a dozen more.
I admit, I giggled a little at Peter & Olivia drinking their box wine. Also, aww, to the two of them, and to Peter and Walter.
#20
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:09 PM
So, the whole thing about the First People was just sending the machine back in time? Not about actual people inhabiting the Earth a gazillion years ago? Hmmm...
Well, we already knew Sam Weiss wasn't one of the First People.
#21
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:09 PM
Bad Robot indeed. Bad, Bad Robot. More bad than the finale of Lost. More bad than Sydney Bristow waking up two years into the future and finding out that her boyfriend had married another woman.
Edited by LizJ, May 6, 2011 @ 9:11 PM.
#22
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:09 PM
#23
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:09 PM
#24
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:10 PM
#25
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:10 PM
So if Peter never existed, what about Altlivia's baby, Henry?
I need to rewatch the opening credits to see what sort of things we will experiencing on Fringe 15 years from now.
#26
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:11 PM
The last few minutes were the only thing that shocked me but I don't really understand it. Honestly, I felt kind of cheated that we didn't spent enough time with Our characters. This didn't really feel like a finale episode. It felt more like a part 1 of 2. Shame. And Peter not existing we know isn't going to last because he's a main character so it kind of makes the finale pointless. No?
#27
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:11 PM
Olivia: Hey, where'd you get this cute ass baby from?
Faux: Um?
Also, Walternate has gotta be in the top 10 for worst dads ever.
ETA: Although I admit I'd be fine with Henry disappearing. Sorry baby Bono.
Edited by Ulkis, May 6, 2011 @ 9:15 PM.
#28
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:11 PM
Edited by Swedge, May 6, 2011 @ 9:20 PM.
#29
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:12 PM
Also, does Henry exist if Peter never existed?
Omigosh! Henry! I was waiting for somebody (well, Walternate, I guess) to mention Henry, but it never happened. And now without Peanut, there's no Lil'Peanut. Sad.
This is just all around depressing.
#30
Posted May 6, 2011 @ 9:13 PM
What an ending!
Seriously, there are people who did not like this ending??? This is a science fiction show - of course they can wink a main character out of existence. Now the writers will have to be ingenious and get themselves out of this corner. I'm intrigued!
Edited by Money Magnet, May 6, 2011 @ 9:15 PM.







