Mike & Molly
#1
Posted Sep 19, 2010 @ 11:13 PM
#2
Posted Sep 20, 2010 @ 5:32 AM
#3
Posted Sep 20, 2010 @ 5:46 AM
#4
Posted Sep 20, 2010 @ 11:23 AM
#5
Posted Sep 20, 2010 @ 11:33 AM
It's like, who cares? I don't think Sookie's weight was mentioned even once during the entire run of Gilmore Girls, and I adored them for that. Because while it is something that comes up now and then as a fat woman myself, for the most part I'm just living my life. It's not aaalll about being fat.
#6
Posted Sep 20, 2010 @ 8:42 PM
#7
Posted Sep 20, 2010 @ 8:57 PM
#8
Posted Sep 20, 2010 @ 9:00 PM
Edited by sordidheart88, Sep 20, 2010 @ 9:02 PM.
#9
Posted Sep 20, 2010 @ 9:02 PM
#10
Posted Sep 20, 2010 @ 9:04 PM
#11
Posted Sep 20, 2010 @ 10:08 PM
#12
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 12:03 AM
Edited by Lord Seth, Sep 21, 2010 @ 12:03 AM.
#13
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 12:11 AM
#14
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 12:15 AM
Frankly, the fat jokes were my favorite part of the show.Lord Seth
The fat jokes were definitely overused but I think the show has great potential if they move away from that; some of the fat jokes were genuinely funny but there were just too many of them.
#15
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 9:02 AM
I remember reading an interview with the producer and he was insisting it was going to be a show that just happened to feature two plus sized people. And that it would not rely on 'cheap fat jokes.' So surprise, here come all the fat jokes. And good Lord, the laugh track was enough to deafen you. That's usually not a good sign.
#16
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 9:06 AM
I'm not really sold on the show yet. I thought the laugh track was grossly overused and distracting. At this point I think the acting outshines the writing but I'll give it a chance, see if it settles into itself. It does seem almost hopelessly formulaic right now, and character development at this point is basically "blatant stereotype", but part of me is hoping they'll find their own rhythm and voice and things will improve. I'll give it a chance because I thought the actors performed well with what they were given but was disappointed with the writing.
#17
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 9:28 AM
I will definatly watch next week.
#18
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 10:07 AM
#19
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 11:39 AM
I'll glance back at M&M, too.
But here's what disturbed me from the previews. First: a qualifier. I'm fat (grew up skinny as a rail and learned bad eating habits because I could, then hit 30 and... oh well). I know that being fat is unhealthy, so I try to exercise/eat right. But that's as far as my concerns about being fat are. It doesn't dominate my life, and I definitely don't feel lesser for it.
The few scenes I saw the on preview--they're at Overeater's Anonymous, meaning they want to stop being fat. Molly's working out on a treadmill and trying to deny cake at home. They were all about these characters not wanting to be who they are. To me it's similar to what I often dislike about Leonard on TBBT... he doesn't like what he is and tries to hide it from others for external validation. Not fun (although, again, I get that being a genius is far healthier than being overweight).
Anyway, thanks for giving me validatin about missing the show!
#20
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 11:41 AM
#21
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 11:53 AM
I think the show is much more than just fat jokes. There weren't many fat jokes lobbed at Molly (none at all actually) and the jokes at Mike's expense are just the sort of things men do sometimes. It's obviously meant in jest between the two. There is a heart here that is missing from shows like Two and a Half Men. I'm going to keep watching.
Oh and in terms of the laugh track. I have not ever and still don't care about laugh tracks one way or the other. All laugh tracks are by nautre, intrusive on the comedy. But, it's all the same to me. If there comes a day that I don't watch laugh tracks, I just wont watch multi-camera comedies. They are all the same to me laugh track wise. None is more annoying than the others. Just my opinion.
ETA: I also don't and can't compare this show to Roseanne. The two shows are light years apart. Tone wise, acting wise, etc. It's just different. The two leads on both shows are obese but that's not enough for me to start drawing comparisons.
Edited by Wackadoo82, Sep 21, 2010 @ 11:55 AM.
#22
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 12:10 PM
#23
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 12:36 PM
#24
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 1:02 PM
Now on topic - I was at first excited to see Swoosie Kurtz but her character was annoying. The sister made no sense either. She was more cartoon-like than real. I'm willing to give it another try.
Edited by amroyo, Sep 21, 2010 @ 1:03 PM.
#25
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 1:15 PM
#26
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 1:20 PM
#27
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 2:47 PM
All in all, not too bad of a show, I will check it out in full next week. Like others, I did not like Big Bang Theory when it first came out, but a few seasons later it is now my all time fave, even more than when Friends was on *gasp*! Plus, I loved Melissa McCarthy in Samantha Who?, I think she is cute as a button.
#28
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 2:57 PM
#29
Posted Sep 22, 2010 @ 4:40 AM
Thanks for the alternative perspective, Wackadoo. I'll admit--characters who aren't mean-spirited do make the show sound more attractive.No one is really mean-spirited on this show actually. Mike partner obvious cares about him through all of their banter.
#30
Posted Sep 22, 2010 @ 8:34 AM







