Boardwalk Empire in the Media: Read All About It!
#1
Posted Sep 17, 2010 @ 10:53 AM
Whether it's interviews with the cast & crew or reviews of the show, talk about any and all Boardwalk Empire media sightings here.
#2
Posted Sep 17, 2010 @ 12:19 PM
The NY Times home page today opens up to a full page fake NY Times with a bunch of articles about Atlantic City, Prohibition and Nucky Johnson, as if you were reading it in the 1920's
Edited by Rickster, Sep 17, 2010 @ 12:20 PM.
#4
Posted Sep 18, 2010 @ 5:54 AM
But as with the best of these broad canvas series, the players and their allegiances become clear within an episode or two. And from that point on, “Boardwalk Empire” becomes everything that HBO (and I) had hoped for it.
#6
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 1:08 PM
BOOYA!HBO has given Boardwalk Empire the green light for a second season, just minutes after releasing Nielsen numbers proving it to be an out-of-the-box hit. Sunday's slightly hyped premiere of its twenties-set gangster epic was watched by 4.8 million viewers during its initial 9 p.m. airing, giving the series the best debut numbers for an HBO series in six years (and right around the Nielsen number regularly generated by its smash hit True Blood). The last show to exit the gate so fast was 2004's Deadwood, which had the advantage of a big lead-in from The Sopranos; by contrast, Empire was a self-starter. Add in viewership for two other Sunday showings of Boardwalk, and viewership rises to 7.1 million, which is pretty stunning given that HBO reaches fewer than 29 million homes.
ETA: 4.8 million viewers for an initial airing on a premium pay-cable show is a huge number, right?
Edited by hardy har, Sep 21, 2010 @ 1:10 PM.
#7
Posted Sep 21, 2010 @ 10:19 PM
Yes. 'Boardwalk Empire' Pulls in Highest Ratings in 6 Years for HBOETA: 4.8 million viewers for an initial airing on a premium pay-cable show is a huge number, right?
#8
Posted Sep 22, 2010 @ 4:39 PM
#9
Posted Sep 28, 2010 @ 8:55 AM
#10
Posted Oct 14, 2010 @ 10:11 AM
#11
Posted Nov 4, 2010 @ 10:49 AM
New York Magazine
#12
Posted Nov 4, 2010 @ 1:11 PM
The actresss comes across as even more self absorbed and less enlightened than Lucy.
I know, right? As I read this, I'm thinking...is this a joke? satire? made up? I came away with one word: Narcissist. I need a shower after reading that piece of crap.
#13
Posted Nov 4, 2010 @ 4:06 PM
#14
Posted Nov 7, 2010 @ 10:14 AM
#15
Posted Nov 7, 2010 @ 10:15 PM
#16
Posted Nov 8, 2010 @ 9:49 AM
That whole article just screams of someone who is acting out to try to get attention from her father. Sad.
It is sad, and the writer, Jay Bulger, is very clearly aware of just that. That young woman seems to be trying to live life as performance art, and it is unlikely to go all that well for her. Half Courtney Love, half escapee from the days when Andy Warhol was the last word in shocking. From the article:
The day is getting exhausting, but Paz has an appointment with her psychiatrist
Bulger clearly gets how wearing, bizarre, somehow grotesque, but ultimately pitiable that woman is. I very much doubt she's only 25, but it's interesting that Bulger manages to give a good sense of how much bullshit that likely is, without actually stating outright, "Oh, and for some reason she lies about her age."
Boy, her psychiatrist must be one fatigued professional. Admittedly, since she really does seem to be more performance art than anything else, I wonder what the point is. Not only is that a textbook appeal for parental attention (like a kid who can't differentiate between negative and positive attention), her parents' responses are really very cliched, too. I mean, seriously, I have a very had time believing that her father snapped that dreadful line about Jack Russell Terriers. Someone that bloody awful would hardly be inclined to pick up the phone at three in the morning, much less talk to the reporter. Not to mention answering the stereotypical, "If Paz was an animal..." question that seemed more like a line prompt than anything.
Sounds like an act that a lot of people are willing to participate in her act, knowingly. If it isn't an act, boy, she's a mess and really needs that referenced psychiatrist. Yeah, she is kind of shocking and "Huh? What is that woman doing?" but she really is like the embodiment of a Warhol prediction, isn't she? All of it strikes me as being a little too deliberate, honestly.
Edited by stillshimpy, Nov 8, 2010 @ 9:55 AM.
#17
Posted Nov 8, 2010 @ 11:50 AM
#18
Posted Nov 9, 2010 @ 2:42 PM
#20
Posted Nov 29, 2010 @ 4:08 PM
#21
Posted Nov 29, 2010 @ 4:28 PM
I didn't get that from the interview. He said he was "disappointed" that they had him drinking alcohol in the first season instead of the second or third season. On top of that he doesn't criticize TPTB for having Van Alden for having sex with Lucy or for killing Sepso, in fact he gives legit rationales as to why Van Alden did those things.It doesn't sound like Michael Shannon is too happy with the direction Van Alden took after the pilot
I also want to thank you for providing that link. hardy har
Edited by bulldawgtownie, Nov 30, 2010 @ 10:39 AM.
#22
Posted Nov 29, 2010 @ 6:55 PM
#23
Posted Dec 7, 2010 @ 11:26 AM
#24
Posted Dec 7, 2010 @ 11:49 AM
Maid was acting entirely alone. It is exactly what she said: she couldn't take any more of his abuse. Gillian, that was kind of a mislead, she never said anything when he said he found the poison, we just went out on her look. A lot of people assumed it was her, but that was never our intention.
Okay, now I didn't get that from the episode, but it is good to know. Weiner from Mad Men loves misdirection too and when he resolved one of his misdirects, similarly he didn't clear it up with quite enough clarity for the audience. As a result, Weiner will be answering, "But what happened with Peggy's baby?" until the end of time.
Having Gillian there as Luanne was accused didn't actually clear up for me that Gillian wasn't involved because Gillian was a little too involved with the Commodore's state of agitation. He'd get upset, and she'd try to shush him which made me think she was still hiding something. I'm okay with being wrong, happens to me on an almost daily basis but the reason that misdirection flopped for a lot of people was that clearly Luanne had to be involved. Or at least it seemed so to me, so the misdirect just made me think they were in it together.
Ah well, thems the breaks I guess. I just think he ended up with a muddled story on that plot element.
Edited by stillshimpy, Dec 7, 2010 @ 11:50 AM.
#25
Posted Dec 7, 2010 @ 3:19 PM
#26
Posted Dec 12, 2010 @ 12:23 PM
From a status perspective, I had a hard time believing that she would do that without some cover from someone else - Gillian, Jimmy or Nucky. Suppose Gillian had figured it out and let the Commodore know? Luanne could have disappeared before Nucky could save her, and thus get the heads-up about the Commodore's disaffection with Nucky. Which is what I assume was in the book - or at least a hint.
However, Dabney Coleman is great in the role, and I've enjoyed watching him. It should be interesting to see who is taking care of the Commodore when Season 2 opens, and how he treats that person.
#27
Posted Dec 13, 2010 @ 10:28 AM
From a status perspective, I had a hard time believing that she would do that without some cover from someone else - Gillian, Jimmy or Nucky.
I agree, Princess Louie and not just on the cover issue, on the issue of incentive. The Commodore treated Luanne horribly, but I assumed there would be something that would convince Luanne that poisoning him was worthwhile on something other than the revenge scale. I assumed someone else was the mastermind because they could offer Luanne the money (or cut of the inheritance) that would make it something she'd be willing to undertake.
The entire "I'd have to be the one to clean up the mess" while true didn't work for me because, not to be gross, but the Commodore's long illness seemed to be much messier. I get that Luanne was just supposed to hate the snot out of the Commodore, and I can definitely understand that, but killing her employer, in a manner that was just going to really make her job that much worse. Nasty, racist crumb that he was, it isn't as if dying by inches in horrific pain was improving his personality.
So whereas I was glad to have that cleared up by the above article, that plot element wasn't just a case of a misdirect working a bit too well, it doesn't make a ton of sense. Luanne killed the Commodore in a slow manner, to revel in his suffering, with nothing to gain but his dead body and her unemployment? Okay. So the resolution is that Luanne was crazy and preferred that method over...stealing like mad from him? Getting another job?
Yeah, it wasn't just that the misdirect worked. It was that the gender opposite of the Butler doing it for no gain was sort of limp as a reveal.
Edited by stillshimpy, Dec 13, 2010 @ 10:30 AM.
#28
Posted Dec 13, 2010 @ 11:55 AM
Time Top 10
Edited by tapshoes, Dec 13, 2010 @ 11:59 AM.
#29
Posted Dec 13, 2010 @ 12:55 PM
Interesting list, too. I've actually never heard of Louie, so that might give me something to check out. Then four of the things in his top ten aren't coming back. The Pacific because it was a miniseries, and then Terriers, Rubicon and Party Down were all canceled.
Edited by stillshimpy, Dec 13, 2010 @ 12:56 PM.
#30
Posted Dec 13, 2010 @ 1:41 PM
AFI Awards best for 2010.









