Dan and Serena: The 'Lonely Boy' and the 'It Girl'
#1
Posted Aug 18, 2010 @ 1:00 PM
#2
Posted Aug 18, 2010 @ 4:03 PM
#3
Posted Aug 19, 2010 @ 5:47 AM
That being said, there's probably a lot to be discussed about them in seasons one and two. It was a defining relationship for both of them. Dan would hardly be where he is now if it wasn't for his relationship with Serena, a lot of Serena's character development (and issues for that matter) can probably be derived from her relationship with Dan. Who knows, if she hadn't dated him maybe she would have reverted back to Old Serena halfway through season one? That's kind of what she did in the books, right? Plus, would Lily and Rufus have gotten back together if Serena and Dan hadn't dated? That was their reason for getting back into each other's lives, wasn't it?
#4
Posted Aug 19, 2010 @ 6:52 PM
There's a case of ambiguous motivation that I might as well address on this thread. In 1.10 (Hi, Society), Dan couldn't escort Serena to the cotillion because his mother's exhibtion was the same night; but Cece (whom I miss, BTW) pissed him off so thoroughly that he decided to defy his parents and escort Serena anyway. I've wondered ever since: was that just what Cece wanted?
#5
Posted Aug 19, 2010 @ 11:09 PM
Edited by allusion, Aug 19, 2010 @ 11:12 PM.
#6
Posted Sep 8, 2010 @ 11:14 AM
If they get back together (even if it's in the last episode of the series) I'll feel like it's just a matter of time before they break up.
#7
Posted Oct 27, 2010 @ 5:52 AM
#8
Posted Nov 11, 2010 @ 11:15 AM
On rewatch, Dan's talk with Serena and her subsequent expectation for Colin to resign got even more ridiculous.
I think it's odd that the show keeps promoting a "love triangle" between DNS, because from the past episode, it seemed fairly clear Dan was her choice. As far as Dan goes, it's almost as if we have to view the whole of S3 as having not happened. I can't forget the interaction between Nate/Serena and Dan/Vanessa where everyone was gushing and so excited to see the other couple together, Serena even going so far as to suggest role play to Vanessa. Wha?
Edited by Desafinado, Nov 11, 2010 @ 11:18 AM.
#9
Posted Nov 11, 2010 @ 12:21 PM
On rewatch, Dan's talk with Serena and her subsequent expectation for Colin to resign got even more ridiculous.
I think it's odd that the show keeps promoting a "love triangle" between DNS, because from the past episode, it seemed fairly clear Dan was her choice. As far as Dan goes, it's almost as if we have to view the whole of S3 as having not happened. I can't forget the interaction between Nate/Serena and Dan/Vanessa where everyone was gushing and so excited to see the other couple together, Serena even going so far as to suggest role play to Vanessa. Wha?
Agreed. In my mind the only thing left of their love triangle is that Serena might not want to get back with Dan because it might hurt Nate, who she does still care about as a friend. I think at this point we're pretty much supposed to forget about everything once it's happened, and just accept whatever BS the characters are spouting with regards to their pasts. Next episode Serena will probably wax poetic about her relationship with both guys, completely forgetting all the things that were wrong at the time, until she randomly remembers her decision earlier to not date either of them.
Or better yet, until someone completely changes her mind using only the power of suggestion. 'You deserve someone who will give up everything to be with you, just like I did when we were dating' W.T.F. That is dirty, dirty lie Dan! We were right there when you were dating and we know darn well that you were shitty to her at every conceivable oppertunity. Maybe he could give up his self-righteousness for her, that would be huge concession on his part.
#10
Posted Nov 11, 2010 @ 2:10 PM
Maybe he could give up his self-righteousness for her, that would be huge concession on his part.
Hahahahaha
What makes it even more douche-y is, this is the man who basically broke up with Vanessa because she had the gall to enter the same application pool as he did. He's never willing to give up *anything.* He even still tries to play the "Humphrey's are better than all y'all!" card while Lily's billionaire money is in his wallet, and the only reason he even knows Serena is because he wasn't willing to give up school to pursue his dreams the way his best friend and his sister both did.
Oh yeah, and remember when he spent all summer hooking up with girls, then slut-shamed Serena for one (fake) kiss with her (fake) boyfriend, Nate, at the White Party (S2)? He's not only not willing to give up anything he wants, he expects everyone to give up everything for *him*!
At this point, I can't even enjoy watching Serena date anymore, because it's entirely nonsensical, and I could never enjoy Dan's self-righteous raging.
#11
Posted Nov 13, 2010 @ 4:31 AM
They're pretty much under my radar these days. I really, really hope they don't end up back together because I've found their characters insufferable enough as they are, without some kind of super merge.
#12
Posted Nov 16, 2010 @ 5:29 PM
#13
Posted Dec 11, 2010 @ 4:01 PM
We were right there when you were dating and we know darn well that you were shitty to her at every conceivable oppertunity.
But, that's not the truth. I don't know if I'm wearing rose-colored glasses or not, but I always thought he treated her pretty well. Yes, he's judgy, but no one is perfect. He loved her and would listen to her. He thought the best of her. But, I don't see how he was shitty to her at every turn.
I've really enjoyed how the show has made it clear that while Dan has his issues with the UES, he holds Serena to a different standard. That despite who she may have been, he believes in who she is now. He was the only one willing to believe that she didn't get herself drugged up in a cheap motel. He wanted people to give her a chance to speak for herself, something that not even her best-friend was willing to do.
So, while DS have had their moments of absurdity, I think they fit very well. Especially when I look at the other big couple on this show: Chuck and Blair. Their problems (and dan's mild douchery) are nothing in comparison.
#14
Posted Jan 18, 2011 @ 6:33 PM
See, to me it's the complete opposite. Don't get me wrong, Chuck and Blair have essentially been ruined for me with the ridiculous plots they've gone through, but at the core they have similar (admittedly warped) values and wholly love each other. Dan and Serena, on the other hand, have little to nothing in common. Dan hates everything about the UES, and Serena is a big part of that world. She can't help it if she was brought up in a certain way; yes, her family has money. That's not her fault. Yes, she can get out of trouble by playing the "van der Woodsen" card. That's not her fault either. She enjoys her lifestyle; enjoys being able to go out, she likes to go to parties and events, and there's nothing wrong with that. I get sick of Dan acting like anyone from the UES, or anyone who pertakes in that lifestyle, is shallow and therefore beneath him. And that's why I think Dan and Serena won't work.while Dan has his issues with the UES, he holds Serena to a different standard...So, while DS have had their moments of absurdity, I think they fit very well. Especially when I look at the other big couple on this show: Chuck and Blair.
#15
Posted Jan 19, 2011 @ 10:01 PM
#16
Posted Jan 20, 2011 @ 2:01 PM
Which isn't to say that Dan is in a zen-state regarding the UES--he still judges (Blair and Chuck for packing off Jenny, Lily for being an absentee mother, Serena for being so damn indecisive in choosing between him and Nate) but he is more likely to listen to reason--and to the reason of those who he is judging (Blair points out to him that Jenny is disruptive even when she means well, Lily points out that Dan didn't know Serena when S was doing drugs, and Serena points out that he's always known she's a free spirit).
He has more of sense of humour about the UES rather than a chip on his shoulder. In many ways, he's come to embrace his label as 'the ultimate insider.' He DOES still hold himself higher than the people he associates with in the UES (recall his talk with Vanessa 4.07), but he doesn't think that lifestyle or that world is completely evil, totally frivolous, and only about money.
#17
Posted May 2, 2011 @ 9:29 AM
Dan realised Serena wasn't perfect and as this image was shattered the relationship started to break down at the end of S1. I think Serena had begun to embrace that "bad-serena" side to her and her need for Dan weakened. (It's difficult to read Serena because she's such a flaky character changing boys every episode and most of them do seem to be of importance to her while in the relationship. People argue she cared the most about Dan but I think it only comes across that way because they had 2 seasons devoted to them. I would argue she cares equally about Carter and Nate.)
Dan and Serena have both changed as people and - Dan in particular - no longer look for the same ideals in an adult relationship. Connecting on an intellectual level is important to him and it's something he never did with Serena as Blair pointed out.
Edited by paupers, May 2, 2011 @ 10:26 AM.
#18
Posted May 2, 2011 @ 10:07 AM
Anyway, I agree the relationship should be treated as over.
#19
Posted May 2, 2011 @ 10:33 AM
If Dan/Serena hadn't been together at all for nearly two years, and were basically brother and sister, then the dramatic impact would be roughly that of Nate/Serena. Serena already looks pretty unreasonable to be upset about Dan/Blair, but she'd look really unreasonable if they hadn't done the reboot at the end of last season.
#20
Posted May 2, 2011 @ 10:36 AM
Did they worry that Dan and Vanessa would be to isolated in NYU/Brooklyn?Were Serena and Nate too boring to write alone?
I think Dan/Vanessa didn't get as positive a response as they hoped - it's a tough ask considering how unpopular Vanessa is. I think Serena/Nate's popularity is under-estimated, a large number of people who liked them in the books have continued to like them on the show. I always saw the potential there and it's a shame the writers never quite exploited it. Likewise with Carter/Serena.
ETA:
I think this is true. Although I wonder how much of Serena's backlash is because of her actual feelings towards Dan. She seemed pretty over him and it comes across more as just simple self-absorbed jealousy. Blair was mean in her take down but very true.I got the impression Dan and Serena were meant to be over, and I think they really might be as well. My theory is they needed to reboot Dan/Serena to get maximum impact for Dan/Blair.
Dan doesn't seem into Serena at all either, he's ready and willing to move on. The big player in Dan/Blair's future is really Serena/Blair as opposed to Dan/Serena.
Edited by paupers, May 2, 2011 @ 10:44 AM.
#21
Posted May 2, 2011 @ 11:36 AM
My theory is they needed to reboot Dan/Serena to get maximum impact for Dan/Blair.
I think so as well, because nothing about the reboot has screamed "you should be rooting for this couple!" Also, it gave Dan/Blair a bigger connection point, while Dan could have been there as a friend for Serena through her Juliet drama, it made more sense to have him there as somewhat of a love interest...it all just seemed a bit half-hearted. And with both Serena and Chuck being thoughtless, it gave Dan and Blair something to bond over. I am interested to see how the season ends, though, might change my mind.
I don't think Dan/Vanessa was ever meant to be a long term love affair. As soon as they got together they had issues...and in their case they were issues they created themselves.
#22
Posted May 7, 2011 @ 3:55 AM
If there was any residual feeling left for Serena, wouldn't he have made more of an effort to convince her. I know he's falling for Blair, but still, it just seems that the Dan who would go to any length to make things right with Serena is gone. And thank god for that. I find the character infinitely more interesting when they're apart, especially these last episodes with his friendship with Blair. Also interesting that by leaving Dan completely missed Blair defending their friendship. Because Blair wants to make it up to Serena, but at no point is she willing to abandon this new friendship to do that. Rightly so, I think both Blair and Dan have really grown up in S4.
Well I guess a child that turns out not to be yours and being bartered for a hotel would do that :-)
Edited by Snooker83, May 7, 2011 @ 3:56 AM.
#23
Posted May 14, 2011 @ 10:10 AM
#24
Posted May 14, 2011 @ 11:17 AM
I think it goes beyond the general squickiness of their parents being married, as Dan/Serena were a couple before that. It's now going on two years that a) Dan and Serena aren't a couple and b) their parents are married and forming a family unit. I also think Dan's growing brother relationship with Eric also makes those family bonds tighter.
#25
Posted May 16, 2011 @ 12:25 AM
I think another issue with Dan/Serena is that the longer Rufus and Lily are together, the harder it gets for them to be a couple again.
I think that the writers agree with you here because it seems like Dan's attendance of family events is inversely correlated to the romantic nature of Dan/Serena's relationship.
However, I think there is a strong possibility that if Dan and Serena were rebooted, it would be when Lily and Rufus would be having marital problems to give D/S another obstacle, loyalty to their parents. They've already done their parents getting together as an obstacle.
#26
Posted May 20, 2011 @ 9:59 PM
I'm speculating here, but I think that if Dan hadn't known about Serena shielding Eric in Poison Ivy, he'd have found another reason to reconcile with her. You don't lose an obsession that easily (but everything would be different if Nate had gotten to her first). Serena was willing to to skip the cotillion, but when Cece convinced her to go, I think Dan would have been willing to escort her, had he not been unwillingly committed to Alison's art exhibit at the same time.For example, in The Wild Brunch episode Dan was willing to walk away from Serena after finding out about the Nate affair -- he didn't want to be a part of that scandalous world. In High Society, Dan was perfectly willing to skip the cotillion and only decided to go when Cece insulted him.
#27
Posted Jun 25, 2011 @ 3:01 PM
I wonder if the writers are going for a further complication of DS' story and a way to bring them back to each other (now that the wool has been removed from their eyes and they no longer place each other on a pedestal), or if this is a way to say that their history is a lie and Dan never really loved her. I don't know, but either way it'll be interesting, since at least Dan can't fully claim to be in the right anymore, or be the "wronged" one in the relationship. Or so I hope.
#28
Posted Jun 25, 2011 @ 4:43 PM
I wonder if the writers are going for a further complication of DS' story and a way to bring them back to each other (now that the wool has been removed from their eyes and they no longer place each other on a pedestal), or if this is a way to say that their history is a lie and Dan never really loved her. I don't know, but either way it'll be interesting, since at least Dan can't fully claim to be in the right anymore, or be the "wronged" one in the relationship. Or so I hope.
I actually think that relationship is the most interesting it has been in 4 seasons at this point. They have evened the scales and made both parties wrong enough time that they could start over. I think it all depends on the book. Realistically someone writes a fake expose on you and your friends and they get dropped. I expect that there will be lots of DS next season. They have built it up with the book reveal and with the crush on Blair. I don't think we have ever seen a really large falling out between Dan and Serena? I could see a big fight coming and then a big reconciliation.
#29
Posted Jun 27, 2011 @ 8:45 AM
#30
Posted Jun 27, 2011 @ 8:54 AM
I just don't see it.









