Downfall
#1
Posted Jun 22, 2010 @ 8:22 PM
Answering trivia questions while watching your prizes fall off a building, hosted by Chris Jericho
website
#2
Posted Jun 22, 2010 @ 8:48 PM
I thought this would be mildly entertaining, but it isn't even that - won't watch this again.
#3
Posted Jun 22, 2010 @ 9:05 PM
#4
Posted Jun 22, 2010 @ 9:08 PM
#5
Posted Jun 23, 2010 @ 1:37 AM
#6
Posted Jun 23, 2010 @ 9:54 AM
#7
Posted Jun 23, 2010 @ 12:29 PM
#8
Posted Jun 23, 2010 @ 11:25 PM
#9
Posted Jun 24, 2010 @ 5:41 AM
Jericho did say at the beginning of the show that they were replicas, not the actual prizes. I'm thinking fiberglass castings.I can't think of anything stupider in bad economic times, than a game where either someone wins something or it gets destroyed.
What most amuses me is how they keep saying they're playing on top of a skyscraper, and I keep saying to myself, "six stories is all you need to qualify as a skyscraper? Really?!"
#10
Posted Jun 24, 2010 @ 11:38 AM
I think that by the end of the summer, it could be a entertaining show if they tweaked it a bit more. It came out a bit too early, and I don't think it will survive long enough for them to get it right.
#11
Posted Jun 24, 2010 @ 1:20 PM
#12
Posted Jun 25, 2010 @ 8:11 AM
However, like a lot of this six-episode series, the prizes are phony. They are mere replicas of the actual prizes, built to fly apart upon impact. In a sense, even the top prize of $1 million is phony. Small print during the closing credits, legible only with the assistance of a pause button, explains that in the event there is a grand-prize winner, which seems highly unlikely, the money will be paid out over 40 years ($25,000 a year). Or the winner can get a lump sum based on net present value (perhaps about $200,000, depending on assumptions about future interest rates).
#13
Posted Jun 25, 2010 @ 8:24 AM
I found the following interesting. It was in an article about the show.
That's pretty much how all lottery prizes are awarded.
#14
Posted Jun 26, 2010 @ 12:55 PM
I can't think of anything stupider in bad economic times, than a game where either someone wins something or it gets destroyed.
The concept of the game puts the producers in a spot where they can't satisfy everyone. If they destroy real prizes, they get dinged for wretched excess in the middle of a severe recession. But using replicas naturally opens them to accusations of bait-and-switch.
#15
Posted Jul 7, 2010 @ 5:24 PM
#16
Posted Jul 12, 2010 @ 12:45 PM









