Whale Wars: Greenpeace on Steroids
#1
Posted Nov 20, 2008 @ 12:15 PM
#2
Posted Nov 22, 2008 @ 4:35 PM
Plus, I think the captain totally guilted Potsy into going about the Japanese ship because he damaged the helicopter rotor and that was really uncool.
But, it's beautifully shot and every once in a while, you get to see some whales that aren't being slaughtered, and that's really cool.
#3
Posted Nov 22, 2008 @ 5:10 PM
But no way in hell would I ever sail under the Head Asshat! I get that Paul Watson cares way more about animals than people, probably with very good reason and so God bless him! But at some point, you have to show your commitment to the people who are so deeply committed to your cause, too. Otherwise, you're just an Assclown with a big boat.
Which pretty much covers Watson to a "T". He's even claimed responsibility for scuttling docked ships over the years, among other bizarro tactics.
BTW, Season 2 was already signed before a single episode ever aired. Animal Planet says they've tried to get the Japanese involved to show their side of the issue, what goes on on their boats, etc. I'm thinking we should probably not hold our collective breath waiting for the Japanese to take them up on it.
Edited by AsIfYouWish, Nov 22, 2008 @ 5:11 PM.
#4
Posted Nov 23, 2008 @ 3:39 PM
I would like to know what Watson did during his Greenpeace stint that made that organization kick him out.
One of the things that I find really interesting about this show is that there's a lot of incompetent people on the Steve Irwin. There's something about the first mate that is really strange- I don't think he has much of a clue about what he's doing.
Anyway, I like this show.
#5
Posted Nov 23, 2008 @ 5:50 PM
I would like to know what Watson did during his Greenpeace stint that made that organization kick him out.
As I recall, there was a big controversy in the 70's over his tactics regarding the anti-sealing campaigns (I believe that he confronted the sealers and threw the sealer's clubs and the seal carcasses in the ocean) which resulted in the US, under heavy Canadian pressure, pulling Greenpeace's tax-exempt status for a period of time. Nothing motivates an organization like losing its tax-free status! The ultimate net result, if I recall correctly, was that GP decided that Watson didn't share their non-violent ethics and bounced him.
If that's indeed the case, then what with we've seen on Whale Wars I'd say they weren't too far off the mark. Watson clearly enjoys the spotlight and will do whatever it takes to get it and maintain it. While his motives may be pure, his methods are clearly not those of a peaceable group.
#6
Posted Nov 23, 2008 @ 6:01 PM
#7
Posted Nov 23, 2008 @ 6:48 PM
#8
Posted Nov 23, 2008 @ 6:57 PM
#9
Posted Nov 23, 2008 @ 7:02 PM
I love how they twist their story around for more media attention. Of course the Japanese are going to tie them up at first! They just jumped their ship! They don't know if they have weapons or bombs or whatever. If the Japanese boarded their ship, wouldn't they have done the same?
I think this show sheds a bad light on the Sea Shepherd.
I also love how Paul doesn't volunteer for his own ideas.
#10
Posted Nov 23, 2008 @ 10:06 PM
Seriously, how does this crew manage to get anything done? They don't seem to have much training before going out to sea (aside from 3 or 4 mainstays, and the 2nd in command guy is a certifiable dolt). It seems like an interesting volunteer opportunity, but it's more along the lines of going to be human shields in Palestine than, say, building schools or teaching in a 3rd world country. Almost everyone gets seasick at the beginning, they're not well versed in lowering the small boat that does their "missions" (and that was fouled up by the dolt), the guy who was originally given the role of cook became the helicopter assistant guy and then fouled up the blade...and he wasn't familiar with cooking vegan food to start, which is a really good way to make it not taste good. Oh, and the captain has to be such a maverick that none of the other boats in the area want to deal with him.
I like the premise of the show, but I'm not really feeling the people on the Steve Irwin. Maybe they need to reconfigure the Sea Shepherd program (I assume it takes donations) to have several well-trained full time "employees" besides the captain and the first dolt. Whaling season is a few months, right? I would never allow anyone I care about to join a program like this, seeing how badly it's run.
#11
Posted Nov 23, 2008 @ 10:24 PM
I can't stand the Chief Hippies. The Captain, the First Mate, and that other Nerdling running around.
Hilariously, I haven't seen them save a single whale, just almost kill themselves multiple times. For the whales.
#12
Posted Nov 24, 2008 @ 10:26 AM
Oh, and I think Willfred is the only non-crazy guy there, so of course the idiots in "the chain of command" got mad at him when he took charge and started a search for the missing delta boat. Ugh.
Seriously, this show raises my blood pressure, but for some reason I can't stop watching.
#13
Posted Nov 24, 2008 @ 4:03 PM
Asshat Watson should not have stayed up for umpteen hours doing publicity by phone. He should ensure that's well-rested in order to make sound decisions! When you have missing crew, that is an emergency, period. Then refusing to even go greet those whom he sent into harms way to do your bidding and then used for publicity fodder? Unconscionable!!
Edited by AsIfYouWish, Nov 24, 2008 @ 7:27 PM.
#14
Posted Nov 24, 2008 @ 5:54 PM
However, I can't back these guys, and couldn't watch much of this show. They seem quite dangerous to themselves and others.
#15
Posted Nov 24, 2008 @ 6:09 PM
And you can't call it "kidnapping" when they voluntarily (and illegally, presumably) boarded the boat without permission. What did they expect to happen? Clearly, they wanted a "kidnapping" so they could get some international media attention.
#16
Posted Nov 24, 2008 @ 7:31 PM
What did they expect to happen? Clearly, they wanted a "kidnapping" so they could get some international media attention.
Well, yeah. That's what it takes these days. As much as I appreciate and admire Greenpeace's work, the fact is, they aren't getting much done in the way of positive change these days. In order to get people's attention and provoke outrage, you have to be outrageous. Change seldom happens without a lot of audacious acts.
Do the ends justify the means? I guess that's a matter of personal ethics.
#17
Posted Nov 25, 2008 @ 11:50 AM
Watson cares more about staging an incident than he does about the safety of his crew. Hostages? How were the Japanese in any way guilty of kidnapping and holding hostages? They're lucky the Japanese didn't defend their vessel more vigorously to being boarded by eco-terrorists.
If I didn't know any better I would have guessed this was a mockumentary. The incompetence that is displayed on all levels is astonishing.
Edited by charlesmartel, Nov 25, 2008 @ 11:52 AM.
#18
Posted Nov 25, 2008 @ 1:33 PM
I think this show is the most compelling thing I've seen on Animal Planet outside of the Animal Cops/Precinct franchise. I do think that the people working on the ship do not communicate well sometimes and the Delta boat being lost the other night was inexcusable. They should have called in.
I agree with their mission and their tactics. Their tactics are aggressive but they cannot be called violent. They do not use lethal means. The violence is what is done to the whales.
#19
Posted Nov 25, 2008 @ 3:29 PM
I think the man's going to get someone killed.
This is all just my opinion obviously. I think their cause is just. But the methods are just ludicrous.
#20
Posted Nov 25, 2008 @ 5:54 PM
Sending two of his crewmembers to board that Japanese ship went beyond harrassing the whalers. It was sending two people into a situation where they could have been seriously injured or killed
They could have said no. They looked fairly pleased to be on the Japanese ship according to the footage when they first jumped on. I guess we'll see this week what their ordeal was like and whether they regret it.
#21
Posted Nov 25, 2008 @ 6:26 PM
Without getting into the debate of whether or not whaling is right, I absolutely cannot believe that Sea Shepherd can justify their actions. First, the International Maritime Bureau defines piracy as "the act of boarding any vessel with an intent to commit theft or any other crime, and with an intent or capacity to use force in furtherance of that act." After throwing stink bombs and slippery powder on deck, the whalers had no reason to think their intent WOULDN'T be malicious. They have been endlessly harrassed in a very confrontational manner--there's no reason for them to allow Potts and Giles to explain why they're on the boat before detaining them. They did what any normal people would do--neutralize the threat first, then figure out the actual intent.
Don't get me started on the prop foulers. Any Deadliest Catch fans here who remember what a big deal it was when some of the crabbing boats have gotten their props tangled in lines and had their engines disabled? Though it's unlikely that an engine of that size would be able to have its prop disabled by a single line (it would likely chop straight through that line), it would be a major hazard to all aboard should their engine become disabled in open sea. The fact that the Sea Shepherd people are willing to possibly kill people over their own personal interpretation of the law? It's like somebody deciding that a 50 mph speed zone is actually a 25 mph speed zone and putting out a nail strip to blow out the tires of any car traveling faster than THEY feel the car should be traveling.
I feel like most of the crew aboard have their hearts in the right place, but I'm not a fan of Paul Watson. I think he's taken advantage of some very well-meaning and naive people and used them as tools to achieve his own self-serving mission. He may have started this whole thing with the right intent but I think he's gotten caught up in his own ego along the way. His quote from the last episode about how he wasn't going to go shake hands with Potts and Giles when they came back on the boat because he "doesn't leave the bridge"? What an ass. They easily have a multi-million dollar operation and it seems that, as the show noted that many legal experts don't think the whalers are breaking the law, the money would go further by spending time in court to change the laws and get real enforcement--but that wouldn't put HIM in the spotlight like it does now. My opinion only, of course.
The education of the people on board, as it relates to boats and boat safety, is laughable at best and extremely scary at worst. The flipping of the zodiac was handled so casually--each person should have been assigned a post to report to IMMEDIATELY in case of emergency. All of that should have been practiced dockside, before the boat even left port. I'm amazed that there were no fatalities.
I do think the Japanese are skirting the edge of legality with their "research" (esp. when it ends up on school menus after the research is done).
Do remember that the voice-over said that the laws surrounding whaling for the purpose of research dictate that meat be used and not wasted. I'm involved in the commercial end of many "research" fisheries and it's very typical that fish/shellfish/etc. taken under US-regulated scientific research projects enter the market commercially--I'd imagine it's no different internationally.
One last thing to add my big rambling rant--I've been told by many of my more knowledgable fisherman/boating buddies that flying a calico jack flag (like what the Sea Shepherd has) is illegal, as you aren't supposed to display anything on your boat that is related to piracy. A quick internet search didn't pop up anything to support this, but I figured I'd throw that out while I was nitpicking everything else :)
#22
Posted Nov 25, 2008 @ 6:36 PM
This doesn't mean that I think the Sea Shepherd tactics are correct or will be effective.
#23
Posted Nov 25, 2008 @ 6:52 PM
I'm not trying to be argumentative, just genuinely curious. I think most everybody has agreed that the Sea Shepherds' tactics are pretty questionable, so we're on the same page with the most important part, hee!
Another question out of curiousity--what do all of you think of Animal Planet airing a show with such a radical agenda? I feel like it's a little irresponsible to show something like this, almost like Animal Planet is endorsing the actions (I felt the same way about their choice to show Grizzly Man Diaries, but that's neither here nor there). Any thoughts? Is this doing a good job of portraying each side of the issue? Is it making you see the issue any differently?
#24
Posted Nov 25, 2008 @ 7:41 PM
I know the show said that the Japanese harvest 15 whales annually, the amount allowed under the law. I would think that the show would mention if the Japanese were overfishing, since the show seems to be intended to support the Sea Shepherds' cause.
You terribly misheard or misunderstood what was said.
From an article in the July 2007 issue of Cosmos:
"In the coming 2007/08 season, Japan proposes to take up to 935 minke whales, 50 fin whales and 50 humpback whales. In sum, this will be more than double the total number of whales Japan has previously taken on its annual whaling voyages to the Southern Ocean."
LINK
From the November 18, 2008 edition Australia's Sunshine Coast Daily (newspaper):
"Japan kills about 1,200 whales a year in two hunting expeditions under a scientific program that Tokyo says provides crucial data on populations, feeding habits and distribution of the mammals in the seas near Antarctica and the north Pacific Ocean.
Because of the disruption [to the hunt last year due to Sea Shepherd's activities], the fleet last year returned [in last year's hunt] with 551 minke whales, just more than half of the planned catch."
LINK
#25
Posted Nov 25, 2008 @ 10:45 PM
What the Sea Shepherd and Watson are doing ultimately hurts their cause in the greater public mind. And it's not persuasive to the whalers whose lives Watson treats so cavalierly. Not to mention his own crew. I'm all for saving the whales, but not like this. This is barbarism on the other end of the spectrum, where human life becomes a cypher in the name of the cause.
#26
Posted Nov 26, 2008 @ 12:22 AM
I think Pottsy was feeling incredibly guilty and remorseful about having damaged the helicopter rotor during the rescue and the captain utilized that remorse to pursuade him to go aboard the Yushin Maru. I thought the manipulation was appalling from someone so senior.They could have said no. They looked fairly pleased to be on the Japanese ship according to the footage when they first jumped on. I guess we'll see this week what their ordeal was like and whether they regret it.Sending two of his crewmembers to board that Japanese ship went beyond harrassing the whalers. It was sending two people into a situation where they could have been seriously injured or killed
Of course, if anyone knew what they were doing on that ship, a) the zodiac wouldn't have flipped and b) the rescue would have been more organized and c) the rotor wouldn't have been danaged.
#27
Posted Nov 26, 2008 @ 12:39 AM
The "kidnapping" thing was absurd. That would be like me jumping in the back of a moving pickup truck and then filing kidnapping charges against the driver.
#28
Posted Nov 26, 2008 @ 5:00 PM
I'm sure there are wrongdoings on both sides. The difference is that the Japanese were smart enough not to invite a camera crew along to document their shady actions.
Edited by yama, Nov 26, 2008 @ 5:44 PM.
#29
Posted Nov 29, 2008 @ 11:24 PM
From what I remember, they gave the numbers AsIfYouWish quoted.Thanks for the links, AsIfYouWish. I'll have to go back and rewatch the first episode, that's where I thought I heard the figure of 15 whales. Maybe they said FIFTY, which would match the figures your article gives for humpbacks and fin whales. I do remember the show gave a number of whales that the Japanese were killing.
I like this show. A lot. I think Watson's a bad captain at best, and his crew is not particularly good. And their tactics are dangerous and sometimes silly. But there's a part of me that thinks that we need more aggressive tactics if we're going to try to fight off extinction. I feel the same about global warming. I don't think that simply being a witness like Greenpeace is going to work much.
So yeah. Any show that makes me think about these issue is great in my book.
#30
Posted Nov 29, 2008 @ 11:59 PM
It makes me sad though, because their cause is just and their passion and commitment are both enviable and sorely needed in this world. But it's all being horribly abused and misguided by Captain Asshat.







