Chef Ramsay must make many changes to a small restaurant in Bellmore, N.Y., to keep it afloat.
1-3: "Mixing Bowl" 2007.10.03 (recap)
recap): post #1'>
#1
recap): post #1' />
Posted Oct 2, 2007 @ 6:35 PM
recap): post #2'>
#2
recap): post #2' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:01 PM
Is it a concentration camp mentallity that the owners would tolerate a Putz of a "manager" like that? I would never share my tips with that.
Also did anyone else think that this new "Healthy" food looking kind of bland and colorless?
recap): post #3'>
#3
recap): post #3' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:02 PM
recap): post #4'>
#4
recap): post #4' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:03 PM
That was really the only thing worthy of comment in this episode. Another arrogant useless manager? Yawn. With another miraculous personality transplant, an amazing turnaround, a thrilling community event, and hugs and tears all around, Gordon saves the day, blah de blah. Totally done by numbers, and I'm about to give up.
recap): post #5'>
#5
recap): post #5' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:03 PM
recap): post #6'>
#6
recap): post #6' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:07 PM
Each week GR seems determined to villainize someone--this week, the manager. Who's producing this show, James Carville?
The remodel left the awful signage on the windows ("Seafood Steaks Pasta Espresso Desserts") but added ugly-ass white curtains. Didn't we see those same curtains at Dillon's last week?
And what's the deal (other than the product-placement fee) with inviting the New York Dragons? They had nothing to do with the new menu, they looked out of place among the restaurant's clientele. If bringing them in had been Mike the Manager's idea, GR would have disemboweled him.
recap): post #7'>
#7
recap): post #7' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:09 PM
Edited by crystalsage, Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:10 PM.
recap): post #8'>
#8
recap): post #8' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:10 PM
While he's probably still an asshole, it grates on my nerves when editors do stuff like that.
recap): post #9'>
#9
recap): post #9' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:13 PM
Otherwise, this show is tolerably entertaining but it's no HK. The short-fused character Ramsay plays there is just more fun to watch.
Edited by tominboston, Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:22 PM.
recap): post #10'>
#10
recap): post #10' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:21 PM
recap): post #11'>
#11
recap): post #11' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:24 PM
Here's my question, though-- the opening narration says, "Gordon Ramsay is crisscrossing America" to salvage restaurants. As of next week, he's been to Manhattan once and Long Island three times. How does he manage the frequent flyer miles?!
recap): post #12'>
#12
recap): post #12' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:28 PM
Whoopee!
I like Gordon alot, think he's delightfully entertaining. But if you're going to 'manufacture' drama in what are presented as 'dire situations' and allow Gordon to aggresively 'fix' the situation, simply do another Hell's Kitchen. The problem is that while Hell's Kitchen is becoming repetitive after 3 seasons, this show is becoming repetitive after 3 episodes. There is really noone to root for...
recap): post #13'>
#13
recap): post #13' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:40 PM
I found it comical that all of the sudden people wanted to eat there because they heard Gordon was in town. Very typical. Does anyone have an update on this place? Did they continue to keep people coming in the door?
recap): post #14'>
#14
recap): post #14' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:46 PM
I also thought it weird to have a local football team waltz in to dine on that sort of food. You don't put on that kind of muscle and fat by eating the sorts of foods we saw being served there. They really looked out of place....but then again, we don't know what went on behind the scenes. Maybe the chef/owner had expressed a love for the team and GR used that to fired up his passion...
As for whether or not the manager got an "evil" cut, I personally think that ultimately the manager is responsible for whether or not a restaurant succeeds. No question that there are many factors involved, but that's the job and you have to MANAGE them. To run around screaming "It's not my fault" carries no water. Ultimate responsibility rests at the top--or at least it SHOULD.
And am I the only one who found that Mike, the manager, kept reminding me of Ricky Gervais from The Office?
Edited by IBinHypmotized, Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:49 PM.
recap): post #15'>
#15
recap): post #15' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:49 PM
recap): post #16'>
#16
recap): post #16' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 9:55 PM
I loved the owners but if this isn't a wake up call, what is? Mike is off balance and thinks he owns the restaurant. Why else would he be crying and freaking at the renovation? He can't even manage the floor or reservations. Check please!
recap): post #17'>
#17
recap): post #17' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 10:08 PM
recap): post #18'>
#18
recap): post #18' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 10:13 PM
recap): post #19'>
#19
recap): post #19' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 10:13 PM
It is a policy in some restaurants and in some areas is considered SOP.
Most corporate restaurants do not allow it as it creates a conflict of interest.
But: Morton's of Chicago when I worked there in a BOH position the servers gave XX% to the manager pool.
Edited by usmc5855, Oct 3, 2007 @ 10:17 PM.
recap): post #20'>
#20
recap): post #20' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 10:22 PM
And am I the only one who found that Mike, the manager, kept reminding me of Ricky Gervais from The Office?
No, you're not! I was just coming here to say that.
recap): post #21'>
#21
recap): post #21' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 10:33 PM
recap): post #22'>
#22
recap): post #22' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 10:43 PM
I thought the same thing!Didn't we see those same curtains at Dillon's last week?
I enjoyed the show, but I was annoyed with the manipulative editing. And poorly done manipulative editing. We can see how out of sequence the interviews are based on clothes and background. And the shots of diners looking up in shock (just like on Wife Swap or Trading Spouses) are clearly just people turning their heads in normal conversation. And while Mike came off as wacky, the "villain" edit is so unnecessary. Found the last five minutes (or less) to be an absolute blur. This show will never will awards for editing. At least it reminds me to take all the other reality shows I watch with 1,000 grains of salt.
Mixing Bowl web site - Still has original menu, surely because the show had to air before a web site change. I think a number of the old dishes look good, on paper at least. I like the sound of the new menu, though. And I'll bet that Long Island can use a few more places with something a little different.
I'm far from a Maryland Crab Cake expert, but in my trips to Baltimore, Annapolis, etc. (I live in DC), I've never had crab cakes in a sauce - red pepper coulis or otherwise. Any "Murland" people want to comment? Ooh, this is making me want to catch a train to Fell's Point in "Bawlmer" for lunch tomorrow. Sigh.
Are there any other DC area people here who, upon hearing "The Mixing Bowl", kept picturing the giant interstate interchange in Northern Virginia?
recap): post #23'>
#23
recap): post #23' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 10:59 PM
I'd never heard of that before (but I'm from Wisconsin, currently living in Rhode Island, so no reason I would have) but it sounded interesting so I googled... It has it's own Wiki page and looks like something I would never ever want to drive through!Are there any other DC area people here who, upon hearing "The Mixing Bowl", kept picturing the giant interstate interchange in Northern Virginia?
Topic... I'm thinking Manager Mike needs some sort of therapy. He didn't seem to have much of a grasp on reality. Not the owner, and yet acted like it the entire time. I find it so odd that the owners both clearly didn't like him, didn't think he was doing a good job, and yet he still had said job. Why hadn't they fired him and hired someone competent?
recap): post #24'>
#24
recap): post #24' />
Posted Oct 3, 2007 @ 11:40 PM
I'm far from a Maryland Crab Cake expert, but in my trips to Baltimore, Annapolis, etc. (I live in DC), I've never had crab cakes in a sauce - red pepper coulis or otherwise. Any "Murland" people want to comment? Ooh, this is making me want to catch a train to Fell's Point in "Bawlmer" for lunch tomorrow. Sigh.
FutonPotato, as a "Murland" person, that's a first for me to see crab cakes in a sauce like that. Usually they are served as a sandwich or stand alone with small greens.
I like hearing GRrrr say "MARYland."
Are there any other DC area people here who, upon hearing "The Mixing Bowl", kept picturing the giant interstate interchange in Northern Virginia?
Count me in on that, too. I'm not far from DC (20 minutes) and I always heard about the darn "Mixing Bowl." Definitely wouldn't want to eat there.
Mike was a bit odd. Crying one minute, blaming others for his mistakes, sign fetish. He needs some help. Really.
I liked the wife and husband. They made a nice couple. He seemed like a decent chef. GRrrr never attacked his cooking skills per se, just his menu.
Anyone hoping announcer guy gets a really bad case of laryngitis, say forever? Put GRrrr in there, please?
recap): post #25'>
#25
recap): post #25' />
Posted Oct 4, 2007 @ 12:12 AM
recap): post #26'>
#26
recap): post #26' />
Posted Oct 4, 2007 @ 1:39 AM
Those signs were soooo tacky. The makeover really elevated the restaurant to a higher class. Not bad!
recap): post #27'>
#27
recap): post #27' />
Posted Oct 4, 2007 @ 5:59 AM
recap): post #28'>
#28
recap): post #28' />
Posted Oct 4, 2007 @ 6:16 AM
The narrator has to go. Like these kitchen/restaurant makeovers, I think it would improve the show 100%. When I heard him going into a commercial break saying, "When we come back, the service you have to see to believe!", that summed up everything that is wrong with this show. First, of course, Gordon would never say that. Second, we don't need the drama spelled out for us, FOX, thanks. Why not let any natural drama unfold before our eyes rather than telling us the "drama" is on its way? Third, we don't need drama! That's not what the show is primarily about. Yes, there is drama and conflict in the UK version, but it is part of the overall tone of the show; it's not the primary draw. And when there is drama, it never reeks of bad editing and manufacturing.
This is probably the "best" of the three episodes thus far, because the "drama" didn't include as much scenery chewing as the other two. I did get a good laugh with Gordon when he saw all the signs. And when he asked, "Is there anything else I need to know about?" and Mike said, "No. [pause] Well...", the reaction from Gordon was priceless... and natural.
I loved the new chairs! Didn't really get a good long look at the rest. Didn't get a good long look at Gordon's legs, either, except to say, "Get some sun on those things, Gordon!" And what? No glimpse of him switching into his chef whites? Tsk. I will say watching him cook with Billy was my favourite part of the episode. Everything else around him might be manufactured on this show, but there is something wonderfully real about watching him cook.
"It's not my fault!!"
Edited by slyest romantic, Oct 4, 2007 @ 6:17 AM.
recap): post #29'>
#29
recap): post #29' />
Posted Oct 4, 2007 @ 6:37 AM
If they produce sound bites like that for every episode someone ought to sample and mix them into a nice little song.
recap): post #30'>
#30
recap): post #30' />
Posted Oct 4, 2007 @ 7:36 AM
Hell, *I* would have kicked the managers ass myself!









