As Snarky as Dr. Cox: Complaints and Negative Opinions
#1
Posted Mar 20, 2006 @ 6:33 PM
Do you think J.D.'s become too cartoonish? Do you find the fantasy sequences eye-rollingly goofy and dumb? Do you feel that Jordan's become a dull shell of her former, deliciously evil self? Are you displeased with the Carla-Turk pregnancy storyline? If so, this is the place to vent!
#2
Posted Mar 20, 2006 @ 6:57 PM
The first season had all those characters, a lot of humor, great drama (but not too much) and very believable characters. I was taken aback by the season finale where everything seemed okay and Jordan came in and messed it all up.
I rewatched the first season a couple of times, loving it.
Through illegal interweb means, I get the second season and it disappointed me a great deal. Every problems set off by Jordan in the finale all work themselves out on their own in the first episode!
It disappointed me a great deal and as the second season went on, it was funny but it felt like the characters were frozen in sitcom amber, retrograded from season 1, so they could work longterm in a sitcom (like, if JD matures too fast, he cannot be as goofy). It soured me on the show and left me disappointed.
I got back on the show this season and now that its not as close to season 1, I enjoy it a whole lot but it still has something it lacks comapred to season 1. I'm more interested in catching the stuff I missed now though.
#3
Posted Mar 20, 2006 @ 7:44 PM
Though JD has been lucky up to date with all of the good lookin' girls he's hooked up with -- the problem resides that he's not able to remain consistent with any of them. The worst was JD and Elliot, they could not be a couple but interestingly can be very good at being platonic friends. I think Kylie and maybe Julie were closest to JD's personality.
But whether the girls were similar to him or not isn't the problem, he's the one that somehow loses them. I just like to see him be with someone that lasts for a while.
That being said, it's still fun seeing single JD going around still doing goofy single guy things -- that's what makes this show amusing.
#4
Posted Mar 31, 2006 @ 10:52 AM
Nevertheless, awesome season.
#5
Posted Mar 31, 2006 @ 12:53 PM
#6
Posted Mar 31, 2006 @ 5:45 PM
I don't think it's quite fair to "chronic patients"* count those as continuity flaws. The patient who Elliot gave lipstick to came back later as the nanny for Cox and Jordan, but I don't think that was supposed to be the same role.Also, in the season finale they don't know what Mr. Bober looks like, while it's the patient who early in the season can only say the word 'Pickles'.
* I wish we had a clever term like the L&O fans have for their actors who turn up in multiple roles: "repeat offenders".
#7
Posted Mar 31, 2006 @ 11:34 PM
The season one finale was actually Mr. Bober's first appearance on the show; the "pickles" episode was in season three ("My Brother, Where Art Thou?").Also, in the season finale they don't know what Mr. Bober looks like, while it's the patient who early in the season can only say the word 'Pickles'.
#8
Posted Apr 1, 2006 @ 2:59 AM
#9
Posted Apr 1, 2006 @ 11:20 AM
#10
Posted Apr 1, 2006 @ 11:59 AM
I'd argue that more broad, random, and crazy doesn't necessarily equal "funnier," and I tend to like pretty off-the-wall stuff. Not that I'm saying the newer episodes are bad, by any means; it's still one of the best things on television. But I've been rewatching the first three seasons lately, and some of those episodes are just perfection. The pilot is a thing of beauty, and how many shows have a great pilot?Braff feels the delay may have helped the show creatively.
"Bill just brought it to the next level," he says. "If anything good comes out of being dissed by NBC in the fall, it'll be the fact that Bill went even further with the scripts. They're even more adventurous; they're even funnier; they're even more broad at times; they're even more random and crazy."
John C. McGinley, who plays the acerbic Dr. Cox, agrees, saying, "(The writers) came back loaded for bear. After four years, it just got this huge injection of energy. They really refocused. The writers are located over in the psychiatric ward, which is kind of ironic. What Billy's putting down on paper for me this year is unbelievable."
#11
Posted Apr 1, 2006 @ 1:07 PM
Not that Scrubs is one to use lame "network" tactics to fake buzz and quality. Just that's how it felt. And I don't particularly blame them for it, since NBC loves to go the other extreme in terms of promotion for Scrubs (aka little to none). So that way, it's all up to the Cast and Crew to create their own hype.
#12
Posted Apr 24, 2006 @ 1:37 PM
#13
Posted Apr 24, 2006 @ 1:42 PM
The originals credits were fun, and I'm glad they changed them back. The song is brief but gets the whole theme of the series and I like watching the medical staff pass the X-ray round.
#14
Posted Apr 24, 2006 @ 7:47 PM
but mainly the extended version of the song bothered me. It was like it was forcibly stretched out.
Fun fact--that's the actual version of the song, from Lazlo Bane's album. Our traditional theme is speeded up.
#15
Posted Apr 25, 2006 @ 2:19 PM
If they'd stuck with the new opening, I wouldn't mind so much anymore. At the time I didn't like it and given their need to not waste any more precious airtime (you'll notice most of the second-season episodes run only 20 minutes instead of 22 like the first-season episodes).
Granted, but it was a fantasy, so is it really a problem? Of course, in his fantasy he has no reason to lie, so the point still stands that it's wrong. And then in the second season when JD, Cox, and Turk compare how many women they've slept with, I don't think JD's number matches the 5 in that fantasy (even if you add any new ones, which I believe is zero over that time since Elliot doesn't count twice).Firstly, when JD adds Elliot to his list of women he slept with, he says he was stuck on 4 since med school, yet earlier in the season he sleeps with Jordan.
#16
Posted Apr 25, 2006 @ 3:01 PM
Worse than JD's number of sexual partners is the way Elliot's sexual experience is all over the place. In one of the first episodes, she tells Carla she uses sex as an ice-breaker, and from that and other lines, she seems like a classic case of a pretty girl with no self-esteem who's easy because that's the only way she can be sure a guy likes her. But when she sleeps with JD, she says that she likes to have The Talk after having sex five times, which usually takes her "six months to seven years," and there are other indications like that. She seems to jump back and forth from being almost frigid to being kind of a slut, depending on what's needed for the current joke or storyline to work. Some of it can be attributed to the character's considerable confusion about sex, but some of it is just poor continuity. I still love her, though.
#17
Posted Apr 25, 2006 @ 3:27 PM
#18
Posted May 9, 2006 @ 6:21 PM
Another thing, which can be explained away but I still *hate*, is the fact that JD was the one to move out of the apartment. It was HIS! He rented it in the first place, not Turk! Turk and Carla should have been the ones to move out, or at the very least, JD should have volunteered. Turk and Carla had absolutely no right to ask him to leave.
Of course, my biggest negative opinion right now isn't to do with the show so much as this forum, but I'm not going to get into that.
Edited by naughtyelf, May 9, 2006 @ 6:24 PM.
#19
Posted May 9, 2006 @ 7:54 PM
Another thing, which can be explained away but I still *hate*, is the fact that JD was the one to move out of the apartment. It was HIS! He rented it in the first place, not Turk! Turk and Carla should have been the ones to move out, or at the very least, JD should have volunteered. Turk and Carla had absolutely no right to ask him to leave.
I thought so too! But it didn't surprise me; couples can be kind of domineering and inconsiderate when there's a third person in the way.
#20
Posted May 17, 2006 @ 4:41 PM
Edited by jcpdiesel21, May 17, 2006 @ 4:41 PM.
#21
Posted May 17, 2006 @ 6:46 PM
ETA : whoops my bad, thanks.
Edited by electricpansies, May 17, 2006 @ 7:46 PM.
#22
Posted May 17, 2006 @ 7:32 PM
I guess I should add something else in this UO thread just in case... So here's my snarky comment: I don't find Jordan funny anymore. I mean, everytime I see her I actually have a mental note "oooh she's gonna say something soooo funny" which is a distraction. But I think mainly it's because of her Botox-ed face lately.
#23
Posted Sep 10, 2006 @ 7:40 PM
Every time I see an ad for "The Last Kiss" I want to throw something at the TV or smash my laptop. Hey Zach. Can you put your own face on more? Seriously? Do you really think everyone loves you that much? Please. You make one cult hit movie loved by a bunch of drunk, irritating college children‡ and suddenly you give yourself top billing? Come on. Rachel Bilson has at least as much pull as ZB and I know she didn't direct the movie, too, but ZB needs to get over himself. I have friends/family who went to high school with him/work at Touchstone and all report that he has always been a pompous asshole.* Now, first I loved Scrubs, then I heard about his assholeyness, so I am able to still enjoy the episodes, but if ZB keeps up with this self-fellating crap I swear I am going to write a letter DEMANDING he quit season seven just so he doesn't ruin my enjoyment of the show. I want to like him. I really do. He is just making it so damn hard.
I thought Garden State was ok, but just ok. I thought he poured all his little heart and soul into it, but it didn't move my world and I think his next few movies are going to lack any spark it had. Did I hear he was friends with Kevin Smith? Who also made only one cult hit movie and the rest, although adored by a tiny legion of fans, are awful. Alas, we're probably going to have to suffer through a bunch of mediocre, whiny white boy movies for the next 10 years before people figure it out.
*Not that just about everyone in Hollywood is a pompous asshole, but when it's so blatantly obvious, how can you not want to puke?
‡Not to offend anyone who really enjoyed Garden State that wasn't a drunk, irritating, college child, i.e, my best friend. There are exceptions to the rule.
Edited by sometimes, Sep 10, 2006 @ 8:25 PM.
#24
Posted Sep 10, 2006 @ 9:41 PM
Ditto, and love. sometimes, I have to change the channel whenever that commercial is on. It KILLS me. Shut up, Zach. You're not as great as you think you are.Every time I see an ad for "The Last Kiss" I want to throw something at the TV or smash my laptop. Hey Zach. Can you put your own face on more? Seriously? Do you really think everyone loves you that much? Please.
#25
Posted Sep 11, 2006 @ 8:36 AM
Rachel Bilson has at least as much pull as ZB
Now, I don't work in Hollywood so I don't know this for sure, but isn't it up to the studio who gets top billing? I thought that DreamWorks figured that Zach was the draw, and therefore played it up in commercials. It also appears that Bilson has a somewhat smaller role which would also lead to her not getting as high of billing as him. But like I said, I don't really know how that works.
I know she didn't direct the movie, too, but ZB needs to get over himself.
He didn't direct The Last Kiss.
Edited by agockows, Sep 11, 2006 @ 8:39 AM.
#26
Posted Sep 11, 2006 @ 10:02 AM
I thought Garden State was ok, but just ok. I thought he poured all his little heart and soul into it, but it didn't move my world
Same here. It's so good to know I'm not the only one who wasn't blown away. I want to love Zach Braff but for whatever reason his movie roles are not endearing him to me. He was a lot cuter when he was a nobody, I suppose.
#27
Posted Sep 11, 2006 @ 8:06 PM
He didn't direct The Last Kiss.
Well kiss my grits. I am so wrong. Let me take that rant back, then.
I still don't like seeing his face everywhere like he's the bee's knees. You bore me, DreamWorks.
#28
Posted Sep 18, 2006 @ 1:53 PM
Same here. It's so good to know I'm not the only one who wasn't blown away
Add me to the list. I mean, I thought it was *okay*, but I didn't see the big deal.
#29
Posted Sep 18, 2006 @ 2:04 PM
The thing is, I really do feel ZB's ego is affecting his performance on Scrubs. When I watch those first few seasons, it never even occurs to me to separate ZB from the adorably vulnerable, self-deprecating and kind-hearted character he plays on screen. This past season, though, I felt ZB exuded this smirky, self-congratulatory arrogance that actually affected the way I felt about his character. And, sadly, less love for J.D, translates (at least for me!) into less love for the show overall.
Oh, and as someone who nearly always prefers subtle verbal wit and clever wordplay to 'wacky', how-zany-can-we-be hijinks and physical comedy, I am REALLY unexcited by ZB's comment that we're in store for more of the latter type of humor this season!
Edited by marlaas, Sep 18, 2006 @ 2:13 PM.
#30
Posted Sep 18, 2006 @ 3:05 PM
Having said that, I can sort of see some massive arrogance and ego peaking out of Braff during a few of the interview segments.







