Flip This House (A&E)
#1
Posted Jul 16, 2005 @ 2:52 PM
#2
Posted Jul 24, 2005 @ 7:37 PM
Unlike Property Ladder, we see how they locate and choose properties. Overall, it has more of a business focus than a renovation focus.
Hey, let's not let a little thing like city ordinances stand in the way of our profit.... Waddaya mean, you don't have permits? What's the big rush? Was this the only time slot the crew had available?
Poor Ginger, getting her dream stomped on. I liked Termite Guy, though. He was fun.
#3
Posted Jul 24, 2005 @ 8:32 PM
It was interesting. I think I will watch it again. The house was definitely improved by I wonder about the estimates they used to quantify how much the house was. Isn't the value determined by how much someone pays for it? Were the numbers they were using based on the final sale price?
I liked the realism of the annoyed neighbors because these fix it up shows like to gloss over that and only when neighbors call the cops or force them to have a specific shut down time do we ever really hear about the neighbors. This was surprising that they had problems in the first episode because usually they have at leaast a full season done before there is a hint that they are anything but wholly loved. Even in those instances the neighbors are never really shown in a flattering light.
Permits? We don't need no stinkin' permits.
#4
Posted Jul 25, 2005 @ 5:56 AM
Regarding the permits. That's a sticky issue. When I am representing a buyer and they are interested in buying a house that has had renovations done, the first thing I do is go to City Hall and pull copies of the permits that were issued and make sure all of the work was signed off. This year alone I sold three homes that had major work done, but no permits were pulled. That is a huge mess.
Since the purpose of getting permits is to have the work inspected before, during, and after the project, there is no way to go back and undo the damage. Laws vary by state, but in one home I sold the sellers had to prove to the inspector that the kitchen rewiring was done by a licensed master electrician - and if she couldn't she would have to pull down her walls and show how the work was done!
These people renovate homes for a living, I can't believe that they don't have a close relationship with the building inspector - sure it's a pain to have to have someone come out and check your work, but it usually only takes a day or two. And not having the work checked out makes me feel like they have something to hide (such as not using licensed tradespeople).
#5
Posted Jul 25, 2005 @ 7:15 AM
Permits? We don't need no stinkin' permits.
I was surprised they were so cavalier about getting permits and stuff. It looked like, once their arms were twisted, they got permits in one day. I know it would be a pain to wait for an inspector to show up at a job site to sign off before they go to the next phase, but it would protect themselves from getting sued if the house burns down because of bad wiring. I would think an established company like theirs would have some inspectors in their pockets who would come and sign off on their work anytime they needed it. It looked like they had some county councilmen in their pockets. This is the south, isn't it, where a case of Jack Daniels and a freezer full of steaks would smooth over a lot of bureaucratic issues.
The boss was right to reject the project on that termite-infested house. The only thing to be done with that house, IMHO, is to remove all the historically and architecturally significant fixtures, and tear the original house down.
#6
Posted Jul 25, 2005 @ 11:35 AM
Agree with the poster above about taking the architectural stuff out of TermiteHovel and razing the rest of it. How can one be sure the termites are out of the good wood, tho?
#7
Posted Jul 25, 2005 @ 12:10 PM
As a neighbor, tho, if I thought the workers were improving the house and they weren't working at nite, I'd be happy that my property values would go up.
As a neighbor, I would be more concerned about the house next door to me catching fire from uninspected electrical work or flooding from bad plumbing work or exploding from bad gas connections done by contractors/owners who didn't bother to get the proper permits and inspections. I've heard of houses collapsing because some do-it-yourselfer knocked down the wrong wall or decided to convert a deck into a sunroom without adding the proper support. My property values won't go up if a mortgage company refuses to finance a sale because there's not a proper paper trail. Then you end up living next door with a unsellable, abandoned eyesore.
I was wondering if the whole "we don't need no stinkin' permits" was show for the camera
It was probably a show. He wouldn't stay in business long if he did that. The municipality would shut him down or nobody would buy from him because they knew he didn't dot all the i's and cross all the t's.
However, I was less than impressed with the realtor. He got just about what he thought they'd get
I also think his conversation with the realtor was for show. He must have have had a reasonble estimate what he could get for the house before he went ahead with the purchase and renovations. That's why he passed on the TermiteHovel (tm rhys7).
IMHO, upon reflection, I think a lot of the show was staged. When the workers got pulled off the one job, why not move them over to do another house? They must have several projects going on at once. The whole "let's go skeet shooting and not answer the phone" scene was very convenient.
Also, an experienced flipper would know that it takes time to get the proper permits. The whole bust down the fence and start tearing into the house like gangbusters before the ink was dry on the sales contract looked phony.
Anywho, the finished house was gorgeous. Charleston is a pretty place to live.
How can one be sure the termites are out of the good wood, tho?
I meant salvage the non-wood stuff, like the stone fireplace mantel and surround, brass doorknobs, metal light fixtures, etc. Salvage the stone and metal, not the wood.
#8
Posted Jul 25, 2005 @ 12:47 PM
Ginger should have tackled a smaller re-do for her first project. I think she was trying to force the issue. She was ticked at Richard when he pulled the plug after the termite inspection. Made sense to me.
#9
Posted Jul 25, 2005 @ 3:23 PM
However, I was less than impressed with the realtor. He got just about what he thought they'd get (which was wonderful) but it sounded as tho he was going to ask for 750k to start.
As a realtor? We love to list houses. Just about any house. Here's a house, it's worth $550,000. Owner says "can you list it for $750,000". Absolutely - sign here. Once the contract is signed then you can beat them up about the asking price. Obviously they wanted to sell it quickly and move on to their next project, so $750,000 wasn't even in the ballpark.
#10
Posted Jul 25, 2005 @ 5:19 PM
#11
Posted Jul 25, 2005 @ 6:41 PM
Because if the homes are located in inner-city neighborhoods, the idea of glorifying "flipping" is a bit repulsive IMO
As a soon-to-be-former D.C. resident, I am all for fixing, flipping, and beautifying decaying neighborhoods.
#12
Posted Jul 25, 2005 @ 9:57 PM
Edited by etexlady, Jul 25, 2005 @ 10:00 PM.
#13
Posted Jul 26, 2005 @ 6:01 AM
Which would mean that if someone fell down, was hurt or died on the property before the deed was filed, the former owner would have been liable.
#14
Posted Jul 26, 2005 @ 8:33 AM
Here's the part that seems totally unrealistic to me: getting ANY work done in two weeks in Charleston. My folks live near James Island where the work philosophy is often "Last week I couldn't even spell carpenter, now I R 1." and "Why do it right the first time?" (Not so good, here with the road planning, et el). This company must keep a steady group of workers who are used to fast turnaround.
That house was sold for its lot, its water front property. My guess is that in one (or two or three) years time, that house will be replaced by a McMansion.
I was thrilled to see how happy the former owner was with the improvements.
#15
Posted Jul 26, 2005 @ 9:04 AM
This company must keep a steady group of workers who are used to fast turnaround.
I was amazed by the caption that said there would be 10-55 workers on the job site at a time. 55 people is a huge crew! I'm guessing he keeps the same guys working all the time and pays them very well. He did say they were getting paid to drink beer during the days that the inspector shut them down.
#16
Posted Jul 26, 2005 @ 11:21 AM
#17
Posted Jul 26, 2005 @ 3:57 PM
I'm guessing he keeps the same guys working all the time and pays them very well.
That was my impression. He said something to the effect it was costing him $3000 a day that the guys weren't working. So it looks like he keeps them on the payroll no matter what. That's why I don't understand that he didn't have more than one house flip going on. IMHO, he couldn't maintain his business doing one house at a time.
#18
Posted Jul 26, 2005 @ 3:59 PM
#19
Posted Jul 31, 2005 @ 7:11 PM
I can't keep everyone straight. Okay, Ginger and Lori are easy to remember, but all the guys get confusing.
Poor Lori got dogged for her choices at every turn and for not knowing what she was supposed to be doing. Last time I checked, she was temporarily doing this job. Perhaps some of the other team members who work on that end of the business permanently could have assisted her a bit. I doubt she's a mindreader.
#20
Posted Jul 31, 2005 @ 7:24 PM
"Common sense" is not mixing beer and guns.
Love,
Your moms
#21
Posted Jul 31, 2005 @ 9:46 PM
Beer, guns and a night out on the town. They never said they were trying to change any of the South's negative stereotypes so I guess it was fine. Although there are definite times when this show reminds me of The Office (the UK version), it being a documentary about a nutjob boss and his eccentric staff. I hope this show sticks around, it's pretty funny.
I felt bad for Lori for at first but she couldn't decide anything on her own. Is she going to split her pay with everyone she bugged for help making a decision?
#22
Posted Aug 1, 2005 @ 9:08 AM
This show is fun because of the personalities. I hardly even care about the house they are redoing.
#23
Posted Aug 1, 2005 @ 4:36 PM
#24
Posted Aug 1, 2005 @ 10:18 PM
#25
Posted Aug 2, 2005 @ 12:00 AM
#26
Posted Aug 2, 2005 @ 7:07 AM
I did notice that the sisters made more money than the flippers. Each sister got $95K; the flippers made $75K profit.
I'm thinking a lot of this show is staged for dramatic effect. The stakeout (had a Blair Witch Project feel to it), the painting the house exterior the wrong color (the guy was using a small can of paint), the kitchen cabinet delay (it shows up in a UHaul instead of a company delivery truck), the coincidental discovery of a house that belonged to the mother of a old high school friend (everybody conveniently is available to show the house while the cameras are rolling).
Edited by philmphile, Aug 2, 2005 @ 7:18 AM.
#27
Posted Aug 2, 2005 @ 8:21 AM
I'm thinking a lot of this show is staged for dramatic effect. The stakeout (had a Blair Witch Project feel to it), the painting the house exterior the wrong color (the guy was using a small can of paint), the kitchen cabinet delay (it shows up in a UHaul instead of a company delivery truck), the coincidental discovery of a house that belonged to the mother of a old high school friend (everybody conveniently is available to show the house while the cameras are rolling).
I think a lot of things are staged for the cameras to add drama, but most of it doesn't come off as too fake to be believed. I would guess that Rich had wanted to redo the friend's house and maybe even already had it scheduled. They just made it seem like Ginger discovered it. I've seen similar stakeouts take place before, but I doubt it's something they do on a regular basis. I'll give them the cabinets. It's possible they normally send someone to pick them up to save on delivery costs or to make sure the order is correct. The house paint mix-up did seem totally fake.
At least this show doesn't make me froth at the mouth like Property Ladder. I actually like these people, and I don't mind that they make money.
#28
Posted Aug 2, 2005 @ 9:26 AM
#29
Posted Aug 2, 2005 @ 10:00 AM
I really like this show. I was just dying when they were staking out the house - I commented to my boyfriend that it was unbelievable that the owner of what is sure to be a multimillion dollar business was drinking large amounts of beer with guns, while watching the house. He pointed out that it was the south.
platys, I believe that you can find people mixing guns and beer all over our country, not just in the South. Would it have been less offensive to you if they'd had Bronx accents? (Not to mention, he had what he called a "scatter gun" which I believe just sprays buckshot and cannot kill anyone. But I'm not a gun person...perhaps someone else knows more about them.)
But it has been my experience that you can find stupid people anywhere, not just in the South.
#30
Posted Aug 2, 2005 @ 10:05 AM
Edited to add on that note, I became a "Loyal Viewer!"
Edited by Alyce, Aug 2, 2005 @ 10:03 AM.







