Mike & Mike in The Morning
#1
Posted Nov 3, 2004 @ 8:08 AM
#2
Posted Nov 4, 2004 @ 9:33 AM
#3
Posted Nov 4, 2004 @ 3:22 PM
I can't believe Greeny didn't know where Ohio was.
#4
Posted Nov 5, 2004 @ 9:48 AM
#5
Posted Nov 5, 2004 @ 6:41 PM
There've been times where I repeat stories they've told, that had me rolling on the floor...Golic especially is a great storyteller. And Bob is a walking sports encyclopedia.
But yes, it is way past time to retire the Smarty Jones bit.
#6
Posted Nov 5, 2004 @ 6:56 PM
The radio show that ESPN SHOULD have televised was the brilliant Tony Kornheiser show.
#7
Posted Nov 8, 2004 @ 11:56 AM
The radio show that ESPN SHOULD have televised was the brilliant Tony Kornheiser show
Which, according to the Washington heads in the PTI thread, is coming back on the air on Wed.
#8
Posted Nov 8, 2004 @ 4:48 PM
I don't think Tony K. would be too enthusiastic about a 6am show.The radio show that ESPN SHOULD have televised was the brilliant Tony Kornheiser show.
I must be a masochist or insane because I usually stick around to listen to Dick Vitale's Monday morning segment. I don't know why. I think he's the phoniest phony in the world and I don't agree with him on most things.
#9
Posted Nov 9, 2004 @ 3:45 PM
The Harry Carey stuff was funny, cause it was true.
Edited by jediknight, Nov 9, 2004 @ 3:45 PM.
#10
Posted Nov 18, 2004 @ 8:27 AM
#11
Posted Nov 18, 2004 @ 9:03 AM
Well, I'm a black man, too and I'm offended that Dungy's so fucking uptight that he can't take his ultra religious fucking head out of the fucking sand and have a little fucking fun.
Cheesesteak, I had the exact same reaction to Dungy's comments yesterday. I missed Dungy on Mike and Mike this morning although they say that they are about to replay them but I'm surprised we are still hearing about this. I thought the skit was dumb and not football related but at the end of the day it was no worse than having Dennis Miller in the booth 3 yrs ago.
eta Dungy brought up that what a 49 yo man would realize that the skit didn't represent real life a child might not realize the same thing. And when a child watching that skit would have to have AIDS, rape, and responsibility to other teamates (i.e. why is TO still in the locker room with this woman and not on the field with his team) explained to them.
Then he went on to say that the skit reinforced stereotypes that exist about black men and athletes in general regarding their sexual appetites. He argued that TO had a responsibility to realize that and should have declined to be in the skit.
He felt if ABC wanted to promote their show they should have used their talent (Al Michaels and/or Madden -- and that would have been hillarious actually IMHO) and he felt as if the players/NFL were being taken advantage of.
I hope Indy and Philly play this season... TO will be ready to go off.
Edited by Da23rdBuchan, Nov 18, 2004 @ 9:47 AM.
#12
Posted Dec 13, 2004 @ 9:22 AM
Edited by cheesesteak, Dec 13, 2004 @ 10:26 AM.
#13
Posted Dec 13, 2004 @ 5:51 PM
I love Golic. He always seems to make sense to me.
#14
Posted Dec 13, 2004 @ 6:46 PM
#15
Posted Dec 14, 2004 @ 8:54 PM
#16
Posted Dec 18, 2004 @ 2:42 AM
Especially since ESPN News just runs the same half hour overnight segment ALL DAY- Mike & Mike actually provide entertaining and current information in the morning.
I wish ESPN News would extend the concept with more of their ESPN radio shows- even the Herd show- if necessary...
#17
Posted Dec 29, 2004 @ 8:14 AM
#18
Posted Dec 30, 2004 @ 11:09 AM
HATE.
#19
Posted Dec 30, 2004 @ 12:56 PM
Baseball players can't choose? I'm fairly sure they can - which is why Gaylord Perry has all the teams names on his hat, and why Reggie Jackson went in as a Yankee - not an A. Or why Wade Boggs will go in as Devil Ray.Stupid-ass Salisbury started talking about how he thought it sucked that baseball players couldn't chose.
#20
Posted Dec 30, 2004 @ 1:00 PM
Not anymore, no. That rule was changed about four or five years ago, and I do believe that it will apply to Boggs for his induction.Baseball players can't choose? I'm fairly sure they can - which is why Gaylord Perry has all the teams names on his hat, and why Reggie Jackson went in as a Yankee - not an A. Or why Wade Boggs will go in as Devil Ray.
#21
Posted Dec 30, 2004 @ 6:57 PM
For example- Gary Carter was inducted as a Montreal Expo- but it was his preference to go in as a New York Met. Gary's reasoning was that he won his World Series ring as a Met, and that the Mets were not an organization in danger of folding or relocating (as the Expos have now done)
However- the H O F wanted their Expo, and got one in Carter. Of course, Gary was just glad to get into the H O F.
When Rocket retires, it'll be a different story. Power talks, especially when you have 300 wins and seven Cy's.
Edited by GoingGonzo, Dec 30, 2004 @ 7:00 PM.
#22
Posted Jan 10, 2005 @ 9:07 AM
#24
Posted Jan 22, 2005 @ 6:38 PM
#25
Posted Jan 22, 2005 @ 8:59 PM
I only catch an hour of their show since Tony Kornheiser's local radio show in D.C. preempts it at 9am EST. But in regards to all the AFC (and Pittsburgh) love, the AFC was the bigger story with better teams. Plus, it's not like Atlanta has a real strong fan base in comparison to the other three, which gives them less of a reason to talk about the Eagles-Falcons game. There's a reason for the term "Steeler Nation." They have a large following nationwide.I enjoy these guys mostly because there's not much competition in the a.m. and I really don't have a rooting interest in any team, but I really hope that the Pittsburgh Steelers lose on Sunday so Greenberg can stop reminding everyone how popular they are there. I'm not sure that's much of an accomplishment anyway. It's as if they've totally forgotten that there's an NFC game. I think ESPN owns the Pittsburgh station, which explains a lot, but that can't justify ignoring Philly and Atlanta as much as they have.
Edited by Midnight Stroll, Jan 25, 2005 @ 11:08 AM.
#26
Posted Jan 25, 2005 @ 6:59 PM
#27
Posted Jan 26, 2005 @ 2:59 AM
Speaking of which, prepare for withdrawl next week. If ESPNews follows what it's been doing whenever Mike & Mike are on the road, they won't be on the TV next week. Though I would think for something as big as a Super Bowl broadcast, you can take some cameras down.
As I said before, if YES can do that for Mike & The Mad Dog, ESPN can almost certainly do it for Mike & Mike.
#28
Posted Jan 27, 2005 @ 8:13 PM
I have to say I like that they show the perspective of a player versus a fan, and being a long time Denver Bronco fan I can relate when Greenie talks about preferring losing in a blowout rather than a squeaker. Oh and not going to the Super bowl rather than getting blown out. I guess that makes me a girlie :)
#29
Posted Jan 27, 2005 @ 8:58 PM
Boo ESPNews, they run the same thing every 30 minutes, why couldn't they just take cameras to Jacksonville and show Mike and Mike, ESPN's already going to be there anyway?
Edited by jediknight, Jan 27, 2005 @ 8:59 PM.
#30
Posted Jan 28, 2005 @ 7:06 AM







