Traffic
#1
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 5:53 PM
#2
Posted Jan 7, 2004 @ 11:34 AM
Regardless, i'm looking forward to seeing this... i like the movie and the commercials are some of the most compelling i've seen come out of USA in while...
It does have quite a bit to live up to though.
#3
Posted Jan 7, 2004 @ 2:27 PM
#4
Posted Jan 19, 2004 @ 11:45 AM
#5
Posted Jan 19, 2004 @ 1:33 PM
#7
Posted Jan 27, 2004 @ 10:16 AM
Cast is first rate. I wish 24 was more like this, and less with the Kim vs. mountain lion sub plots.
#8
Posted Jan 27, 2004 @ 10:27 AM
This may be too early to say this, but it would be neat if they did one of these every six months focusing on new stories and items being 'traffic-ed'.
Who knew Seattle was such a hot-bed of illegal activity. I thought people up there just drank coffee and watched it rain.
#9
Posted Jan 27, 2004 @ 10:55 AM
This may be too early to say this, but it would be neat if they did one of these every six months focusing on new stories and items being 'traffic-ed'.
I agree.
#10
Posted Jan 27, 2004 @ 12:18 PM
I think I'll just watch the BBC original. I even thought the movie was better and it's not one of Soderbergh's best. The tv show did rip off his colorization effects to show anything "foreign."
#11
Posted Jan 27, 2004 @ 12:42 PM
Elias Koteas - where have you been? He's great here as the DEA agent in Afghanistan and I'd watch him on a regular series.
Mary McCormack - also good as his wife.
Balthazaar Getty - a good role for him. very believable as the newbie businessman.
I like that the film is set in SEattle, and think the Afghanistan scenes are being handled very, very well. Will definitely tune in tonight.
#12
Posted Jan 27, 2004 @ 2:18 PM
And, I never knew they had fashion week.
Edited by Bud's Girl, Jan 27, 2004 @ 2:19 PM.
#13
Posted Jan 28, 2004 @ 3:23 AM
Elias Koteas - where have you been?
Beating the shit out of street punks with hockey gear on, and binge drinking with Raphael.
The directing definetly has that "24" feel, something I've missed.
#14
Posted Jan 28, 2004 @ 6:19 AM
That rocked. I can't really say, "Ooo, X's acting was great" or "I really liked it when...". But, for some reason, even though I saw the second showing starting at 11:00pm and I was really tired, I couldn't stop watching it. That's always a good sign.
I feel the same way. I truly enjoyed this show. It held my interest and then some.
#15
Posted Jan 28, 2004 @ 9:24 AM
I'm glad they finally showed us what the DEA agent in Afganistan was up to because I don't think my patience would have lasted too much longer.
Still really enjoying the miniseries. It makes one think without being too preachy.
#16
Posted Jan 28, 2004 @ 9:58 AM
Can't these kids get a dealer that comes to the 'burbs?? I know it's for dramatic effect to take the rich kids into the evil element, but come on!
And I too am glad we found out what Mike was up to.
#17
Posted Jan 28, 2004 @ 12:14 PM
Mary McCormack is a quiet rage here.
The storyline I'm most taken with is the one about Adam [Cliff Curtis]. I find his search for his missing wife/daughter profoundly sad.
#18
Posted Jan 28, 2004 @ 2:09 PM
Of all the storylines, only the teenagers really chafe my ass. I like the rest equally. Oddly enough, now that Ben and mob are working together, I'm kinda rooting for them. They're the most amoral and therefore I know I shouldn't, but I just can't help it. Screw the IRS!
#19
Posted Jan 28, 2004 @ 11:13 PM
Regarding the finale, I'm glad they left it fairly open-ended to revisit later, as someone suggested upthread, although I'd have liked some sort of word on what happened to Angie. I thought on the whole, it was really well done, and I was surprised, given the Vancouver locale, how un-heavy it was with Canadian HITG! folks. It worked in the show's favor, I think. Definitely sad, sad material.
My only quibble is that Martin Donovan seemed fairly anvillicious to me -- was it obvious to everyone else, too?
Edited by NickChick, Jan 29, 2004 @ 1:08 AM.
#20
Posted Jan 29, 2004 @ 11:36 AM
#21
Posted Jan 29, 2004 @ 11:44 AM
Are we to assume that Adam has been infected with smallpox now?
#22
Posted Jan 29, 2004 @ 6:34 PM
Just far too many gaping holes, which is too bad since the first two nights were quite engrossing. Two final notes: Martin Donovan being a bad guy was telegraphed from the opening bell, he was just too much of a Mr. Nice Guy; and that actress who plays the long-suffering DEA wife? Her acting is just dreadful.
#23
Posted Jan 30, 2004 @ 8:51 AM
Re: Martin Donovan. Agree completely, I knew he was up to something, I hate when they do that soap opera-ish, show the "villain" with a weird look on his face so the viewers start wondering if he's up to something. How about not telegraphing everything to us? I didn't know if they'd play it that Mike got a bum rap and the partner got away, maybe the writers felt there had to be at least one "happy ending".
I felt bad for Adam and the kid in the taxi (name?) at the end, altho the kid knew he was getting into some pretty bad stuff, and knew about the smuggling of illegals, but at least he wasn't a cold blooded killer like Ronnie Chow & Company. Loved the look on Ronnie's face when he knew what was coming.
Didn't it seem pretty fast that all of a sudden all those corpses were being discovered to have smallpox. Maybe a little more tension would have been for the one survivor of the freighter to have not been killed by Ronnie's guy. And nobody was gonna notice a murdered cop sitting in a hallway?
#24
Posted Jan 30, 2004 @ 11:52 AM
that actress who plays the long-suffering DEA wife? Her acting is just dreadful.
I have to disagree. I love Mary McCormack.
#25
Posted Feb 1, 2004 @ 10:38 AM
My only quibble is that Martin Donovan seemed fairly anvillicious to me -- was it obvious to everyone else, too?
WORD. He had absolutely no other point being in the miniseries at all. Had nothing to do until the last 15 minutes. Also, I found it unrewarding for him to just be semi-bad and just not know this was smallpox.
The plotline with the kid and Angie was awful and so unrelated to anything else on the show. Seriously, people call the Kim plot on 24 bad? This was terrible. At first, I liked it because I thought it'd be a realistic teenage perspective, but it was a narrative mess that wasted time and was never resolved whatsoever. Not like I cared, cause I hated her, but would it have killed them to put in a throwaway line about how Angie was doing?
Was I the only one confused about what happened to Ronnie with the car keys and whatnot? Could someone help please?
I really liked the main arc and how it all tied together in the end. I loved how relevant that Chechnyan's plot became and how genuinely exciting parts of the finale were. I liked the way they left us with Getty's character on his way to death, but I was unhappy with the ending of Koteas's plotline. Also, Mary McCormack was good, but wasted here. After the first episode, she had nothing to do but chase after her stupid kid.
Overall, I like knowing that really interesting stories like this can still be told through miniseries, but there were some bumpy points in here. Still, I'd definitely go for a sequel. On a final note, did the constant flashbacks to things we'd just seen bother anyone else? It was like they were a half hour short.
Edited by Benji, Feb 1, 2004 @ 10:41 AM.
#26
Posted Feb 1, 2004 @ 11:52 AM
Was I the only one confused about what happened to Ronnie with the car keys and whatnot? Could someone help please?
Are you referring to why he left them? I think he dropped them, saw that he had to go with the mysterious people in the SUV, and realized that he's never going to need his car keys again since he's going to be killed so he didn't bother to pick them up.
#27
Posted Feb 2, 2004 @ 7:23 PM
And to the person who mentioned the continual flashbacks, I agree. There were way too many. It's a cheap gimmick to pad the length of the show. But given USA's history with long forms, are we really that surprised?









