Ms. Anderson
#1
Posted Jan 9, 2004 @ 11:34 AM
#2
Posted Jan 9, 2004 @ 1:52 PM
#3
Posted Jan 9, 2004 @ 3:08 PM
I love that movie (plotline jungle or no). There's so much great acting, it's a joy to watch.
#5
Posted Jan 18, 2004 @ 9:44 PM
Edited by ejluther, Jan 18, 2004 @ 9:44 PM.
#6
Posted Jan 19, 2004 @ 5:53 AM
#7
Posted Jan 19, 2004 @ 9:25 AM
#8
Posted Jan 19, 2004 @ 4:07 PM
#9
Posted Jan 20, 2004 @ 11:26 AM
I am curious how she does in the show, though. Please let us know, Glasgow.
#10
Posted Jan 20, 2004 @ 1:56 PM
#11
Posted Jan 21, 2004 @ 4:44 AM
#12
Posted Jan 21, 2004 @ 1:26 PM
I did not like her performance in WTNIF
Perhaps you've covered this already, if so, I think I missed it. Why didn't you like her performance? The play ultimately closed early, yes? Perhaps you weren't the only one less than thrilled with it and her...
#13
Posted Jan 21, 2004 @ 6:08 PM
#14
Posted Jan 21, 2004 @ 6:54 PM
She was better in the second half, and had an amazing angry phone meltdown scene. It was somewhat the play, somewhat the performance. I've seen way worse and I'd eagerly see her in another play. Can't afford London this go round, though.
#15
Posted Jan 22, 2004 @ 10:27 AM
#16
Posted Jan 22, 2004 @ 11:19 AM
#17
Posted Jan 22, 2004 @ 11:26 AM
i'm about to start reading HoM, and when i've finished it i'll rent the movie. is it an indication of how small my life is that i'm looking forward to it? no, wait, i'm thinking of how i got home early last night to see the start of new ER.
#18
Posted Jan 22, 2004 @ 11:33 AM
As for ER? Can't help you there. Never watched it. But I have been arranging my life around the new season of AbFab lately - does that count?
Edited by ejluther, Jan 22, 2004 @ 11:34 AM.
#19
Posted Jan 22, 2004 @ 12:14 PM
#20
Posted Jan 22, 2004 @ 12:33 PM
I'm just glad to see/hear/know that GA can pull off being "not Scully" - even if the performance itself is not that great, you know?
No offense, but that doesn't make much sense to me. If her performance was lousy or she was overacting, that means she can't really pull off anything other than Scully, no? Giving her different dialogue or a different hairstyle or time period (i.e., HoM) does not a versatile performer make.
I think Gillian is a fairly good actress, but definitely not the end-all be-all of acting. There were times in The X-files when I thought she was cringe-worthy, and her crying scenes were so Acting 101 that I couldn't even feel bad for her sometimes. Nothing says emotion like the single glycerine tear gliding down the cheek. *g*
Ah well, I wish her luck with her new play; hope it does better than WTNIF.
#21
Posted Jan 22, 2004 @ 1:02 PM
Giving her different dialogue or a different hairstyle or time period (i.e., HoM) does not a versatile performer make.
Neither does showing your ass. But that's just me.
Actually I thought her performance in HOM was wonderful. I've sung this tune before. But as an actor, and somebody who has read HOM numerous times and counts it amongst my fave. novels, I found her Lily true to the source material and quite moving.
I haven't seen her on stage so I can't pass judgment, however I do know that for the most part it was the play that was criticized as being weak and not GA's performance.
I do trust and respect the opinions of those who have posted above who did see WTNIF so I have to take their word on her performance. Which was that it wasn't all bad.
I'm not saying she is the end all and be all of actors but I've said it before and I'll say it again. She can act rings around David "shar-pei!face" Duchovny any day.
#22
Posted Jan 22, 2004 @ 1:09 PM
#23
Posted Jan 22, 2004 @ 2:11 PM
#24
Posted Jan 22, 2004 @ 2:45 PM
If her performance was lousy or she was overacting, that means she can't really pull off anything other than Scully, no?
I see your point but I guess I was referring to the critique not being along the lines of, "It was like watching Scully on stage, I could never see/hear anything but Scully from GA." Even if all a pony's tricks aren't good, if you've got more than one - you're not a one-trick pony, if you know what I mean, that's all.
And maybe I'm easily impressed but I can't recall any GA scenes on XF that were cringe-worthy. But, as Ruby points out, she may have looked that good to me due in large part to comparison with her co-star. Not that he was always bad, but, to me, he's no GA...
#25
Posted Jan 22, 2004 @ 4:04 PM
If her performance was lousy or she was overacting, that means she can't really pull off anything other than Scully, no?
Not really - she constructed a completely separate character, but didn't nail it. I think Pusher said it best by saying she lacked subtlety. I found myself aware I was watching a performance. But I was watching Gillian Anderson, not Scully. Same as in House of Mirth, which I think she hit out of the park. My bet is she's trying to find her stage chops again after 10 years on film.
I've sat through a ton of crappy stage production and WtNiF is easily in the upper half of quality. But I kept thinking it should have been better.
I have the same problem with Duchovny as I have with Colin Firth - I am so enamored of their character, who was a perfect fit for their range, seeing them play someone else creeps me out a little. I saw Firth on stage even and it seemed wrong. Is it related to the fact I would shag Mulder and Mr. Darcy in a heartbeat if they were really real but probably not the actors who play them? Probably.
#26
Posted Jan 22, 2004 @ 5:20 PM
I was referring to the critique not being along the lines of, "It was like watching Scully on stage, I could never see/hear anything but Scully from GA."
That's exactly what I meant. Her performance was not Scully-like at all in WTNIF.
Even in Playing By Heart (which I loved) I didn't get any sense of Scully-ness, although she could have gone that way with that character.
#27
Posted Jan 22, 2004 @ 5:36 PM
Hear, hear.I'm not saying she is the end all and be all of actors but I've said it before and I'll say it again. She can act rings around David "shar-pei!face" Duchovny any day.
That was my reaction exactly. It was the first non-XF I saw her in, and I was deeply impressed.Even in Playing By Heart (which I loved) I didn't get any sense of Scully-ness, although she could have gone that way with that character.
I still get blown away every time I see the first "Scully at the counselor's" scene from Irresistable. You only see her face, and her lines are all calm(ish) and controlled, but her face is oh, so expressive.
I think that's when my first love for GAs acting was born, and I've never quite gotten over it. Ergo, the woman can do no wrong acting-wise. No wrong. No. I said no! *fingers in ears* La la la! I can't hear yooooouuuu!
#28
Posted Jan 23, 2004 @ 5:48 AM
predictable, perhaps, but there you go.
#29
Posted Jan 23, 2004 @ 5:44 PM
#30
Posted Jan 30, 2004 @ 5:38 AM
Word and Hee to that.Neither does showing your ass. But that's just me.
I was a gushy twit after HoM so I guess I fall on the side of 'capable at non-Scully' acting. OTOH, theater is a different game so I can't really comment.
Ohh, interesting creepy serendipity: just as I hit reply and started typing, my winamp randomly selected the XF theme remix, wierd! I am relatively new to TWOP and just tripped across this section today. Hallelujah, now I have even more to distract me from school. But I am seriously jonesing for the old days with M/S, esp GA softly singing 'Jeremiah was a bullfrog', *sigh* Good times, good times...
In person, GA was awesome, funny, considerate, polite, etc. and DD, not so much. He came off as a pompous, arrogant, self-centered (need I go on?) jack*ss...and yes, I am a fan of both. My opinions of the two were considerably bolstered and lowered (respectively) after that, but I know people have bad days and in hindsight, I'll give DD the benefit of the doubt (GA too for her share of negative press).







