World Series of Poker / World Poker Tour
#1
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 6:50 PM
Tournament 12 airs tomorrow night (Wednesday), and I finally found this thread! The Reno Hilton is the venue.
#2
Posted Jan 7, 2004 @ 10:00 AM
Also, before WPT comes on (8pm E/7pm C), Travel Channel also shows the "Million Dollar Blackjack Tournament".
#3
Posted Jan 8, 2004 @ 2:31 AM
On a different note, I saw World Series champ Chris Moneymaker this past New Year's weekend at the Mirage. He was playing in the high limit section and had on his characteristic sunglasses. He was so much taller than I expected - I'm guessing at least 6' 2" or so. On tv he looks like a big guy in terms of his weight - but he also looks stocky. Saw him give an autograph to someone and seemed gracious about it. Other than that he didn't seem to garner too much attention. I noticed he walked out with 4 racks of $5 chips, so $2000 total.
#4
Posted Jan 8, 2004 @ 10:46 AM
What was Paul Magritte's (X22) damage? His obnoxious "quack, quack"? His ridiculous giggling? His yellow teeth? I think Cal the Dentist saw X22 as a money machine, and I don't mean due to his poker skills.
On the Celebrity Poker Showdown thread, posters were writing about how boring Phil Gordon is as a commentator. I'd almost take him in a trade for the unfunny and painful Vince Van Patten. "Hollywood Home Game Legend", my ass! Just keep living off your dad's "Eight is Enough" residual checks, play tennis & stay off my TV!
#5
Posted Jan 8, 2004 @ 3:06 PM
I wonder why Moneymaker doesn't play on the WPT events.
I believe most, if not all, of the ones that are showing now were taped before last year's WSOP, which was Moneymaker's first live tournament. To the best of my knowledge, he still isn't a "pro", so I wouldn't be surprised if he didn't show up in any of this year's either.
And X22 is definitely not pretty. Dude just had "savant" written all over him. All brains, zero social grace.
#6
Posted Jan 8, 2004 @ 3:34 PM
To the best of my knowledge, he still isn't a "pro", so I wouldn't be surprised if he didn't show up in any of this year's either.
I know that he is scheduled to play the WPT/Pokerstars Royal Caribbean Adventure of the Seas tourney. He's already registered and plunked down the $10000 entry fee. I think he'll definitely be playing in the WPT this year. I don't recall exactly what his real job was (accounting?), but when you make $2.5 million over 4 days, I guess things can change quite quickly. I guess you're a "pro" when your primary source of income is from gambling. With all that money now, he can afford to just sit back and play in the tournaments he wants to. I say he becomes a regular on the circuit.
#7
Posted Jan 8, 2004 @ 8:39 PM
#8
Posted Jan 9, 2004 @ 3:47 AM
Although Moneymaker did get very lucky, i thought he was a solid player. He did make some mistakes that he lucked out of, like drawing the third eight on Brenes, but he also made some nice plays. Calling Dutch Boyd with just the threes was a very good call, and i don't think anyone would have not called Ivy's all-in with three queens and top kicker. I personally think Farha has nobody to blame but himself for not winning it. Moneymaker bluffed at a pot all-in when Farha had top pair. Sammy knew that Moneymaker was bluffing, but wasn't gutsy enough to call with all his chips.
#9
Posted Jan 9, 2004 @ 9:03 AM
If somebody starts talking to you about poker and how great CPS is, you immediately know that they know squat about the game.
It's supposed to be entertainment, not great poker. Most people are able to distinguish the difference.
#10
Posted Jan 9, 2004 @ 2:32 PM
He reminds me of the Hunchback of Notre Dame...minus all the endearing qualities.What was Paul Magritte's (X22) damage?
Did y'all hear the explanation of his nickname, X22? IIRC, he set up a backgammon championship with 64 players (he was all 64, of course), and X22 won the tournament. Makes me wonder if he's a genius or just plain crazy.
#11
Posted Jan 9, 2004 @ 6:45 PM
Clearly, he is both!Makes me wonder if he's a genius or just plain crazy.
My sentiments exactly.It's supposed to be entertainment, not great poker.
#12
Posted Jan 10, 2004 @ 9:50 PM
The first to win it all from an initial online entry and....
Probably the last champ ever of the series...according to this
Or maybe not?
Edited by Fandomania, Jan 11, 2004 @ 1:38 PM.
#13
Posted Jan 11, 2004 @ 8:43 PM
Also, I'm sure that whoever gets the rights won't lack for a place to hold the tournament -- again, with TV poker's popularity, most of the major casinos would love that name recognition.
#14
Posted Jan 12, 2004 @ 10:43 PM
- Hate Hellmuth with the fire of a thousand suns.
- Adore Lederer. Adore.
- Want to marry Jason Lester and his brown clothes. No one cooler. A guy at the World Series who talks about being mellow, and getting lucky on flops in his interview? He must be mine.
- I don't like him, but much respect to Sammy Farha for his kickass look and style. He looks like a 40s movie star.
- Did I mention the Hellmuth hate? Evil bastard.
#15
Posted Jan 13, 2004 @ 3:02 AM
If i had to make a side bet on a heads up match between Farha and Lederer I think I would have to go with Sammy. Just on looks and confidence!
#16
Posted Jan 13, 2004 @ 6:37 PM
#17
Posted Jan 13, 2004 @ 6:54 PM
#18
Posted Jan 13, 2004 @ 10:41 PM
If i had to make a side bet on a heads up match between Farha and Lederer I think I would have to go with Sammy. Just on looks and confidence!
I don't know ... Lederer is a pretty kick-ass heads-up player. The two times he got to the final table on WPT, he got it down to heads-up and pretty much mopped the floor with his opponents (Layne Flack and Chip Jett) each time.
Gotta love the Professor!
#19
Posted Jan 13, 2004 @ 10:51 PM
mopped the floor with his opponents (Layne Flack and Chip Jett) each time.
Not only that, but he actually seemed to be playing quite loose the whole time in the Flack event. I agree that he seemed pretty tight at the WSOP, but I got the impression that he *widely* mixes up his game from watching his WPT showings. Sometimes he'll play ultra tight, other times he'll go way loose.
#20
Posted Jan 13, 2004 @ 11:06 PM
Not only that, but he actually seemed to be playing quite loose the whole time in the Flack event. I agree that he seemed pretty tight at the WSOP, but I got the impression that he *widely* mixes up his game from watching his WPT showings. Sometimes he'll play ultra tight, other times he'll go way loose.
You also have to take into account the differences in events: The televised portion of the WPT is just the last 6 players, and there's a HUGE difference between playing against 5 other people and the WSOP, where you have 10 at your table the whole time, and as soon as someone gets knocked out, they get replaced by someone from another table. You have to tighten your game up substantially with 10 or so people, at least compared to 6 or fewer...
#21
Posted Jan 14, 2004 @ 1:47 AM
I particularly loved how when Annie was "all in" he walked over to watch her hand get played.
I really want to read the book their other sister (Katy?) wrote about them called "Poker Face".
Edited by tea, Jan 14, 2004 @ 3:18 AM.
#22
Posted Jan 14, 2004 @ 7:08 AM
From what I've read about it, a pretty sad story overall.
ETA: WPT Championship tonite 9pE/8pC
Edited by BillyShears, Jan 14, 2004 @ 9:54 AM.
#23
Posted Jan 15, 2004 @ 12:52 PM
#24
Posted Jan 15, 2004 @ 7:03 PM
On a different note, I saw World Series champ Chris Moneymaker this past New Year's weekend at the Mirage. He was playing in the high limit section and had on his characteristic sunglasses. He was so much taller than I expected - I'm guessing at least 6' 2" or so. On tv he looks like a big guy in terms of his weight - but he also looks stocky. Saw him give an autograph to someone and seemed gracious about it. Other than that he didn't seem to garner too much attention. I noticed he walked out with 4 racks of $5 chips, so $2000 total.
Are you sure they were $5 chips? That seems a strange denomination to be toting around in the high limit section, unless the $5/$10 game is considered high limit? Everything I have heard about Moneymaker is that he seems to be a gracious kid who knows how lucky he got. Not to say that he can't play poker, but there are A LOT of great poker players who have never won the WSOP.
Sounds like the WPT reruns are almost over! Not quite as cool as the new season (which starts in March), but any new televised poker is good poker (even when the poker itself is dreadful!).
#25
Posted Jan 15, 2004 @ 7:15 PM
I was playing in a 3-6 game using the red $5 chips, and they certainly looked the same from where I was sitting. Perhaps he was playing 10-20 or 20-40? That night all they were spreading in the normal section was 3-6, so anything higher would be in the back high limit section.Are you sure they were $5 chips? That seems a strange denomination to be toting around in the high limit section, unless the $5/$10 game is considered high limit?
My friend says he heard that Moneymaker is broke. Any truth to that, anyone? I've heard he was playing a lot, and I also heard he was getting kicked around a lot online. But I guess it's all hearsay. At least that night, he seemed to have done well.
Thanks for the link re the WPT Hollywood Home game. Seems like a knock-off of Celebrity Poker Showdown, only with some somewhat bigger names (Daniel Baldwin excluded). Let's hope that Kevin Pollack stays away.
#26
Posted Jan 15, 2004 @ 7:36 PM
#27
Posted Jan 16, 2004 @ 7:37 AM
#28
Posted Jan 16, 2004 @ 8:31 AM
The celeb photos are towards the bottom of the page: http://www.worldpoke...o_gallery.phtml
#29
Posted Jan 16, 2004 @ 2:41 PM
That night all they were spreading in the normal section was 3-6, so anything higher would be in the back high limit section.
Ahh ok. I was thinking more along the lines of the private tables for high rollers, which run games like $300/$600 (in which case a small blind would be 30 $5 chips!). It makes sense to use nickels for $15/$30 or $20/$40.
My friend says he heard that Moneymaker is broke. Any truth to that, anyone?
There have been a lot of rumors spread about Moneymaker. My personal feeling is that most or all are started by people that are jealous that an 'average guy' like him had such a successful run at the WSOP, and are eager to 'prove' that he doesn't belong (I hear a lot of the same stuff about Robert Varkonyi, the 2002 champ). Until I see a dateline story in a reputable news source (I would even count Card Player magazine), I am not gonna buy it. The guy is a freakin' accountant, for Christ's sake; I give him a much better shot at hanging on to at least SOME of his money than a lot of poker players.
Edited by poolsharke, Jan 16, 2004 @ 2:42 PM.
#30
Posted Jan 16, 2004 @ 7:22 PM
Edited by el mapache, Jan 16, 2004 @ 7:23 PM.







