NBA on ABC, ESPN, TNT
#1
Posted Jan 3, 2004 @ 4:22 PM
#2
Posted Jan 5, 2004 @ 5:17 AM
#3
Posted Jan 5, 2004 @ 5:34 PM
And since I don't watch very often, is Bill Walton still there? Because he's horrible too. He used to treat the game like a debate meet. Someone had an opinion, he'd go the other way as if he HAD to.
#4
Posted Jan 5, 2004 @ 7:37 PM
Which is damned rich coming from Tom "The Human Bench Cozy" Tolbert.He can't make a point without doing his "everyone sucks and/or is an idiot" shtick.
#5
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 9:02 AM
I'm sorry to say this but the quality of play in the NBA is shit now. I grew up on the NBA. It was my first sports love. Before baseball. Long before football. The first show I ever saw on a color tv was a Sixers game when they had Wilt Chamberlain - about 1967 so I go back aways. The current NBA product is the worst I've ever seen. It's hard for me to watch now.
Other than Shaq, I don't think there's another true center in the league. Maybe Divac.
No team east of the Mississipi should *ever* be on national tv for the forseeable future. Playoffs, too until the finals.
Coaches should be fined $25,000 every time their team scores less than 90 points. Maybe that'd stop these wretched low scoring games. If I wanted to watch 83-77 games, I'd watch college basketball.
Disband perpetually bad teams. Why are the Clippers still in the league? If your team makes the lottery x times in y years, you get disbanded.
Edited by cheesesteak, Jan 6, 2004 @ 9:04 AM.
#6
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 12:21 PM
Basically, I really think that with any league you should embrace your stars but push and market Teams as much as possible; their history, their backstory, their rivals, etc. because those storylines stand the test of time, players come and go. Stern just completely dumped Team marketing around the late '80s to the late '90s. Huge mistake.
Then add on top of that the fact that the NBA's "minor league" system is broken... Comparing how well the MLB's and NFL's "minor leagues" work to their prepare athletes for the next level to college basketball... Well there's just no comparison and having a minor league that isn't efficient at creating stars just hurts the NBA even more because they are so star driven.
Yao.Other than Shaq, I don't think there's another true center in the league. Maybe Divac.
Or how about relegation? The Clips and the other shithouse teams should be relegated to the minor leagues a la the Premiere League set up. I would love that.Disband perpetually bad teams. Why are the Clippers still in the league? If your team makes the lottery x times in y years, you get disbanded.
Edited by pokey camp, Jan 6, 2004 @ 12:28 PM.
#7
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 1:18 PM
I really like Tolbert's "first team to 100 points" idea. The only thing is that it could make for really painful television. The only other clock-less sport is baseball, and we know how long those games can drag. No need to watch two basketball teams shoot bricks for two hours, much less three or four.
#8
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 2:01 PM
I really like Tolbert's "first team to 100 points" idea.
Are you kidding? That would take three days! I refuse to watch basketball again (college or pro) until someone proves to me that they can make a shot.
#9
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 2:07 PM
No, because relegation would make it near-impossible for them to turn a profit. One reason why promotion to the top/avoidance of relegation in European soccer leagues is so essential is that most of a team's annual income is tied to money from television deals -- money you'll only get by being in the top division.Relegation would just give [certain owners] an excuse to invest less in fielding competetive teams
Right now, these owners know that their television money is a given, so there's no incentive for them to spend money competing. Threaten to have it taken away due to relegation, and I guarantee that they'll start singing a different tune.
#10
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 3:21 PM
Donald Sterling and the Clippers should have been voted off the island 10 years ago.
(I know the McFilthy and McNasty Pistons were thugs too but they could score over 100 points every night.)
Edited by cheesesteak, Jan 6, 2004 @ 3:22 PM.
#11
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 6:14 PM
#12
Posted Jan 23, 2004 @ 7:50 PM
edited to add
Yep, I left the A out on purpose. Now if they had a Steven B Smith on the panel then I might use the A.Steven A. Smith. It makes him sound more important.
Edited by xaxat, Jan 25, 2004 @ 11:40 PM.
#13
Posted Jan 25, 2004 @ 3:46 PM
Man, the NBA on ABC sucks ass. Brad Nessler and Doc Rivers--most boring announcing team ever. The Sacramento-Dallas game was exciting enough by itself, thank goodness. At least they don't do the "See Up the Player's Shorts" or the "Spot the Jiggly Silicone Boobs" camera angle anymore.
The best part about NBC coverage was that they did 2 or 3 games every Sunday, sometimes more with regional coverage. You could get your hoops fix the whole day and see a variety of teams, players, and styles. ABC seems to only want one national game, and leaves the rest of the lesser matchups for cable. And they only seem to have 4 or 5 teams on the schedule -Lakers, Kings, Mavs, Spurs, and Lebron. NBC at this point in the season, would have added some Nuggets, Jazz, and Grizzlies games to their schedule, to highlight these improved, exciting, young teams. Hehe, and the Lakers are a ratings nightmare right now, with only one Hall-of-Famer (out of 4) healthy. Yes, people will really want to tune in to the "Gary Payton and 4 Scrubs Show".
#14
Posted Jan 26, 2004 @ 12:07 AM
(unfortunately, however, Kobe's back).
Sorry, I love it when the Lakers suck. Similar to how I'm still amused by just how terrible the Bulls are.
#15
Posted Jan 26, 2004 @ 8:14 AM
#16
Posted Feb 3, 2004 @ 8:51 AM
Ostertag is solid center, a little inconsistant but it sin't too rare to see him post big board and block numbers while playing out in the west.Other than Shaq, I don't think there's another true center in the league. Maybe Divac
Also I miss Peter Vescey and Snapper Jones.
#17
Posted Feb 3, 2004 @ 12:06 PM
#18
Posted Feb 3, 2004 @ 12:44 PM
#19
Posted Feb 3, 2004 @ 9:21 PM
#20
Posted Feb 3, 2004 @ 11:12 PM
#21
Posted Feb 4, 2004 @ 7:07 AM
Other than Shaq, I don't think there's another true center in the league. Maybe Divac
Has someone forgot about a 7'6" Chinese center in Houston by the name of Yao Ming? Evidently the All-Star voters didn't, as he's the starting West center & not Squack.
#22
Posted Feb 4, 2004 @ 9:04 PM
There are other guys, like Ratliff, Magloire, Ilgauskas, Dampier, but they're all pretty ordinary. Which is part of the reason why the NBA rule that says a back-up centre has to be voted onto each All-Star team is so ludicrous. The only reason the voting doesn't get even more ridiculous is because they count Ben Wallace as a centre every year.
#23
Posted Feb 4, 2004 @ 9:23 PM
#24
Posted Feb 4, 2004 @ 10:38 PM
#25
Posted Feb 5, 2004 @ 11:58 PM
#26
Posted Feb 6, 2004 @ 12:32 AM
Yes, Barkley HATES AI! He resents AI for many different reasons, too many to list here, but for starters--who's gonna go down as the most popular sixers baller in city history at this point? AI hands down over Barkley, of course. This kills Barkley. Also, Barkley will always resent the Sixers organization for shipping him to the Suns, and that compounds his already personal bitterness towards AI. It's also true that Barkley has great distaste for what he sees as the "new guard" (whom he sees as disrespectful, lazy and just wannabe gangsta types) of the NBA as opposed to the "old guard" (including the likes of himself and Jordan). Oh, and there's that fact that Barkley is just a downright bitter person who never won any championship rings ;) Sixers are my team, hopefully they'll now be on an upswing! Remember they went on that incredible streak right after the All-Star break last year :)
Edited by BoxofRain, Feb 6, 2004 @ 12:33 AM.
#27
Posted Feb 6, 2004 @ 1:09 AM
I think people are just plain tired of Shaq's crap. A few days ago, he used the f-word and the s-word in a live TV interview purely to gain nationwide attention. That is so sad. As BoxofRain noted, Yao won the paper vote too. It must KILL Shaq that he is not as popular as the new kid on the block.Being from a country with a current population of over 1.2 billion people probably helped. I don't think there's too many people who'd take Yao over (an even vaguely healthy) Shaq in a straight up choice.
What I want to know is, who are the dumbasses who voted Steve Francis as the starter in the All-Star game? He sucks and he's a total loser! It can't be the Chinese, because he never passes the ball to Yao. Not many people realize this, but he has never been to the playoffs in his 5 year career. The most notable thing about him is that his former girlfriend was Beyonce and his current girlfriend is Cuttino Mobley (oh no I di'int!)
#28
Posted Feb 6, 2004 @ 1:45 AM
The most notable thing about him is that his former girlfriend was Beyonce and his current girlfriend is Cuttino Mobley (oh no I di'int!)
that seriously is some funny sheeit. I've always thought that it would be comedy gold to see a reality-type show with yao, cuttino & steve. Like, Cuttino would get all catty and bitchy if he thought Yao was getting too much of Steve's attention, and steve would play cuttino and yao against each other. LOL.
On the subject of all-star voting, I would like to know about the personality profile of the crazies that voted in Vince Carter?
#29
Posted Feb 6, 2004 @ 2:25 AM
At least the ASG's not like baseball, having to have a guy from each team on the roster. And it's probably not too many years away from a switch to US vs. International, like the NHL tried a few years back.
#30
Posted Feb 6, 2004 @ 8:09 AM
The NBA all star game is who the fans want to see. Vince doesn't belong but he has mega star power. I can see Yao or Shaq, too. Shaq's always injured. I can't rationalize Stevie Franchise, though. Although I think Van Gundy is soooo the wrong coach for Houston, I still can't wrap my head around the fact that Francis and Mobley *still* think they should shoot the ball twice as much as Yao. I think Francis has to be traded if he can't figure out that Yao is more important than he is basketball-wise.
I may be looking at this from an almost old fart's point of view but I don't think A.I. will surpass Doc as the most popular Sixer. We win so few championships here that they're like get out of jail free cards. I'd say: Doc, Iverson, then Barkley.
Edited by cheesesteak, Feb 6, 2004 @ 8:19 AM.







