Trek in Books, Cartoon and Other Forms
#1
Posted Jan 5, 2004 @ 4:18 PM
Strictly, of course, the Trill have a different history from the humans, and maybe they were working on transporters later, or meeting Romulans sooner. But I can't shake the feeling that it doesn't quite fit. Can anyone who's read it since Enterprise started give their opinion on this?
#2
Posted Jan 5, 2004 @ 9:12 PM
They didn't recognize the Romulans for what they are, did they? Tobin's friend noticed something through a face mask but it's possible it's a case like the Ferengi. Records were lost. I guess it's fanwankable but I'd have to reread to be sure.
#3
Posted Jan 5, 2004 @ 9:23 PM
Edited by nelamm, Jan 5, 2004 @ 9:23 PM.
#4
Posted Jan 5, 2004 @ 10:42 PM
#5
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 11:43 AM
Nothing. "The Lives of Dax" posits Trill as a very early Federation member. They seem to be nearly as important as Earth and Vulcan. Nothing in canon seems to indicate that, but nothing really contradicts it, either (The book also makes a point of how the Trill are keeping the symbionts secret from everyone else, to try to fit with TNG's "The Host").What's to say they aren't in contact with Trill in the ENT era?
But that's not really the problem I have. The problem I have has to do with the chronology of technology and Romulans.
#6
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 11:54 AM
On the other hand, there was a comic- actually a graphic novel, "Forgiveness," Wildstorm, October 2001- which had a human inventing the transporter in 2052. But I'm not sure if that version was supposed to have lasted.
#7
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 12:09 PM
There's probably a way to wank it. For example, do the Vulcans have the transporter? Maybe after they saw the humans had it, the Vulcans and Trill worked together to make one. Ultimately, though, I think we just have to admit that Tobin Dax's story was basically the first to explore this era, and didn't have Enterprise as a canon reference point, so some of their details were off.
#8
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 12:37 PM
But Tobin and his Vulcan friend were working on a human ship and Tobin was pretty nervous about being the first person to transport so I don't think humans had the technology already. It seemed to be a joint research effort between the 3 races.Maybe after they saw the humans had it, the Vulcans and Trill worked together to make one.
#9
Posted Jan 6, 2004 @ 10:45 PM
#10
Posted Jan 7, 2004 @ 3:21 AM
The first humanoid ever to be transported is going to be carrying two very large bombs with him, Tobin mused, shaking his head.
So the book directly contradicts ENT-canon. (Part of me would much rather listen to Tobin Dax than to Bermaga, though.)
Edited by LadyBunbury, Jan 7, 2004 @ 3:23 AM.
#11
Posted Jan 7, 2004 @ 8:08 AM
Speaking of which, I finally started Unity last night. I'm just getting into it, but my first impression is, "Yay!"
#12
Posted Jan 7, 2004 @ 8:30 AM
#13
Posted Jan 7, 2004 @ 9:19 AM
Bombs? Can you explain?
#14
Posted Jan 7, 2004 @ 7:35 PM
These Romulans have come aboard in attempt to steal the warp technology that Tobin and this Vulcan scientist guy have been working on ... and Tobin gets the bright idea that if he blows up the engines, the Romulans can't steal it.
It's not the only thing in the book that contradicts ENT canon. Like, I think ENT pretty much establishes that the Romulans have warp technology already (in "Minefield", although I could be mistaken), whereas in the book, they apparently don't (although possibly they just don't have *as good of* warp technology, which I think isn't that big of a stretch).
#15
Posted Jan 7, 2004 @ 9:43 PM
#16
Posted Feb 2, 2004 @ 2:27 PM
Someone above said something about reading "the pertinent chapter of Gateways #7." What does this mean? If I don't need the whole book, I'll find a chair at Barnes and Noble. My amazon wishlist is long enough.
If anyone wants share the love emails on DS9 books, let me know. I'm trying to get them used but, with shipping, new isn't that much more expensive.
#17
Posted Feb 2, 2004 @ 2:47 PM
The chapter in question is basically the last chapter of the book proper. You cannot go without that chapter, and it's quite long.
The structure of the Gateways books is that the 6 first books explore the same problem, the Gateways, that is, from the angle of the 6 different sub-brands of Trek (incl. Challenger and The New Frontier). You will be somewhat spoilered for the TOS and TNG books if you read the DS9 one first, but not in any big way, if I recall correctly.
The seventh book is the last chapter of each of the previous books. The TNG chapter is the last one in this seventh book, so in the end, everything is up to Picard and his crew. (Not a spoiler.)
(The whole gateways series is actually readable, YMMV.)
#18
Posted Feb 2, 2004 @ 2:55 PM
The two Avatar books start the Relaunch officially, right?
#19
Posted Feb 2, 2004 @ 3:03 PM
#20
Posted Feb 3, 2004 @ 12:27 AM
#21
Posted Feb 3, 2004 @ 1:57 AM
#22
Posted Feb 3, 2004 @ 4:57 AM
#23
Posted Feb 3, 2004 @ 5:30 AM
I went to Barnes and Noble yesterday looking for a DS9 relaunch fix and saw that there's an ENT book out - Daedalus. It's Trip-centric.
Anyone planning on getting this, wait until May. It's a part one and part two is released then. Very irritating to get to the end and then having to wait for the next part. It's not too bad, though, I say cautiously.
#24
Posted Feb 3, 2004 @ 8:10 AM
Thanks for the recommendations.
#25
Posted Feb 3, 2004 @ 9:47 AM
#26
Posted Feb 3, 2004 @ 10:18 AM
However, I think in general, they try and respect what's been established in the other books, as long as the shows haven't specifically contradicted it.
#27
Posted Feb 3, 2004 @ 10:26 AM
But, as long as the authors sometimes cannot avoid continuity problems inside a single book (like in IKS Gorkon, where the travel times conspicuously, and annoyingly, do not add up), continuity errors between books and sub-series are very much to be expected every now and then, when there is a plot to be served.
#28
Posted Feb 3, 2004 @ 10:30 AM
Not always, but they've gotten a lot better about keep the series internally consistant. Since they've decided to use them to push the story forward instead of just making them a cheap way to make a little money for Viacom.I imagine it's too much to ask authors to keep everything straight- but do the editors make sure it all fits into one universe?
#29
Posted Feb 4, 2004 @ 11:30 AM
#30
Posted Feb 4, 2004 @ 3:19 PM







