MisterZ
Mar 3, 2006 @ 8:55 pm
Here's a place to discuss Billie Piper and her portrayal of Rose.
HeadCase
Mar 3, 2006 @ 9:11 pm
I really like Billie Piper as Rose. I've never seen her in anything else but some of the comments I read before the show started gave me low expectations of her. But she is excellent and believable to me.
Aurelian
Mar 3, 2006 @ 9:36 pm
I've heard the argument that she's a Mary Sue especially after The Parting of the Ways, but I never really bought into it. I think with the whole reintroduction thing, and especially with the strides that sci-fi has made on television, you needed a much more well-rounded companion. Now, I haven't seen any of the early stuff, but from what I've heard the companion was basically there to get into trouble. Frankly I prefer a companion who is willing to actively do something.
Probably helps that I had no idea that she was a pop star until after I had seen Who.
EllycatinOz
Mar 3, 2006 @ 9:40 pm
God neither!!! Billie Piper (BP) brings a different angle to Companion. And I am not just talking subtext. She is perfectly beleivable as a modern working class gal along for a ride.
At first I thought she was going to be a Peri - all looks and helpless "Doctor Doctor Doctor!" but she got cooler and found her space by about Ep.3.
I liked how in The End of the World
she is suddenly totally overwhelemed and freaked out by her adventure. Nice touch.
Anyway, I think she's the new Buffy. Without, y'know, Slayer powers, but still.
That's what I thought about Ep3 onwards!!!
The next who or who? I don't want to sound too picky, but I feel it's maybe a bit offputting to new viewers to have a thread name which is so obscure to those who don't know the history of the show.
Ah don't be too hard on us old fans!! Besides we can hardly quote from the new series as officially it is spoilery and that would be no fun for US audience either! So what else can we do?
ETA so that I don't cause network ire in multiposting on one thread!
Promethea
Mar 3, 2006 @ 9:41 pm
The next who or who? I don't want to sound too picky, but I feel it's maybe a bit offputting to new viewers to have a thread name which is so obscure to those who don't know the history of the show.
Anyway, I think she's the new Buffy. Without, y'know, Slayer powers, but still.
I loved Rose and was completely won over by Billie Piper, who I'd rather dreaded based on her tabloid reputation for boozy marathons with the ghastly Chris Evans (her ex husband and a major dick). But she nailed the role.
pinkmoon
Mar 3, 2006 @ 9:54 pm
Yep, she totally nailed it. And her chemistry with Eccleston is amazing. Some of the best chemistry I've ever seen. And it's probably something in her because I felt a powerful chemistry between her and David Tennant as well.
Lady J
Mar 3, 2006 @ 10:58 pm
I love Rose. I'm a true sci-fi geek who might have been happy with a more 'traditional' sort of companion, but I think Rose is a great character to introduce more non-genre folks to the series. The fact that she's mostly a realistic 19-year-old girl gives new viewers a great way to introduce themselves into the Who universe. She learns about all these weird things at the same time as the new viewing audience, which is a good device for building an audience, I think!
And, Billie Piper does fantastic things with the role. I've never seen her in anything else - or as a pop star - but she brings just the right combination of normal girl and adventure seeker to Rose. She's made Rose one of my favorite TV characters of the past year.
Edyn04
Mar 4, 2006 @ 12:14 am
I'm not familiar with the other companions, but I really love Rose. I agree with everyone who says that Billie is pretty great in the role. I hadn't seen her in anything before this, so suddenly seeing her go from pop singer to actress had me wondering if she could act and I was pleasantly surprised when I tuned in to the new
Who.
I've heard the argument that she's a Mary Sue especially after The Parting of the Ways, but I never really bought into it. I think with the whole reintroduction thing, and especially with the strides that sci-fi has made on television, you needed a much more well-rounded companion. Now, I haven't seen any of the early stuff, but from what I've heard the companion was basically there to get into trouble. Frankly I prefer a companion who is willing to actively do something.
I agree with this. I think
"The Parting of the Ways" was my favorite ep in terms of Rose being pro-active because of her concern for her Doctor (side note: *swoon*) and her relentless pursuit to try and save him.
FoolishWanderer
Mar 4, 2006 @ 12:50 am
The next who or who?
Peri: known for having big boobs and showing them off. Not the best of companions, competency wise. Also, a fake American accent. For that matter, a victim of bad writing.
Sarah Jane: one of the favourite companions over the years, because she was fairly competent and had great chemistry with Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker, the two Doctors she travelled with. Also, the writing was often better during her time on the show.
Frelling Tralk
Mar 4, 2006 @ 7:30 am
I've heard the argument that she's a Mary Sue
During the Christmas Invasion she was trying her best, but ultimately the aliens laughed at her and it was down to the Doctor to save the day. Which worked for me. Even in Parting Of The Ways, she would have died without trhe Doctor being there to take it from her. So I always see her as a girl who tries her best, but is often lost without the Doctor around to help out. And if she was a Mary Sue, she would probably be a little less bitchy with Mickey *g*
FoolishWanderer
Mar 4, 2006 @ 9:13 am
I feel that all fairly competent major characters tend to get somewhat Mary Sueish, simply because they're put into any amount of danger on a regular basis, and it's up to them to get out of it. However, if I like the character, and enjoy watching them use their wits or whatever to save the day, then I don't complain. It's only if I dislike the goings on that I start talking about Mary Sue.
All this is JMO.
Laserbeak
Mar 4, 2006 @ 11:03 am
I find her a very bland companion. But for some reason the fans in Britain think that she is the best thing since sliced bread and even believe that Billie Piper will move to Hollywood in the near future!
Believe me, I've seen much better young British actresses (so, it's not like they haven't got the talent or anything). Perhaps it also doesn't help that I think that Billie Piper is not exactly attractive in my eyes (though I do know that in Britain her type is considered to be very attractive).
In short, she doesn't exactly make it into my top ten list of best companions, but also not the top ten list of worst companions.
Frelling Tralk
Mar 4, 2006 @ 12:41 pm
I think that Billie Piper is not exactly attractive in my eyes (though I do know that in Britain her type is considered to be very attractive).
Type?
fadooski
Mar 4, 2006 @ 3:53 pm
Well, when I'm watching an episode, I like her. But when I think about the character afterwards I don't. So...
I like Billie but not Rose?
Peri is a better comparisson in terms of what she contributes to the adventure. Having said that Peri's initiation into wandering the fourth dimension was rough (Caves of Androzani). Sarah-Jane doesn't work well for a comparisson because, while she was a young woman when she travelled with the Doctor, she was still a woman. She had a career that she was developing, she had an education and she took the initiative in a way that I wouldn't find credible in a teenaged girl. Also, Sarah-Jane was introduced as a feminist character, at least intially. Rose strikes me as more apolitically post-feminist (I'm not a feminist! I'm pretty and I like boys and shopping!).
Actually, Jo Grant might be a more useful comparison. She was blatantly in love with the 3rd Doctor and married an environmental activist who reminded her of him. Rose is in love with the Doctor and her intial flirtatious interractions with Jack are based on a comparison with the 9th Doctor
I agree with Laserbeak, Rose is nowhere near the best companion and far, far from the worst.
Chiriru
Mar 4, 2006 @ 5:59 pm
In short, she doesn't exactly make it into my top ten list of best companions, but also not the top ten list of worst companions.
Word. My problem with Rose - besides finding her diction annoyingly slurry from time to time - is that I find her
boring. She's just there. Rose is in danger?
Anne-droid is going to turn her into dust? Oh, well. I think BP is a competent actress at best, and I just don't think the character is nearly internersting enough
to garner the taking of companion subtext into text with. Although I know having grown up on Who, I personally perfer the more traditional type of companions -
and I'm hoping once Piper leaves, which really can't be soon enough for me because her Blahness almost rivals Lana Lang's of SV for me, we'll return to more traditional Who. They've already done it with Tennant so and after Christmas Invasion, I really think Mickey's being groomed for potiental companionship and I hope he is; I think he brings a lot more interesting facets to the table.
jeet
Mar 4, 2006 @ 6:18 pm
[SPECULATION]Mickey replacing Rose would be a keen idea.[/SPECULATION]
Cool beans.
Promethea
Mar 4, 2006 @ 8:36 pm
Ehh, each to their own, but I'd hate that. I don't mind Mickey but I like Rose much more. I don't see what's so great about companions who just simper. The only traditional companion I can remember liking was Leela and that was because she looked cool and tried to knife people.
Aurelian
Mar 4, 2006 @ 8:39 pm
Count me in the also hating it group. Rose may be my first companion, but I really like the way that she and Doctor interact. I don't find her bland at all. Besides, Mickey annoys me half the time.
Hermetic
Mar 4, 2006 @ 9:57 pm
One thing I don't like about Rose, and it's my biggest complaint with the new series as a whole, is the way that we keep winding up in London, 2005, hanging out with her mother and not-quite boyfriend. Though thinking about it, maybe with the Doctor's intensified dislocation and loneliness, he doesn't want to put someone else through that as well. (Or maybe with the Tardis' new dislocation and loneliness..)
That's not really her fault, but it keeps me from putting her near the top of my all-time favorites. (Romana II, Sarah Jane Smith, Nyssa, and, um, Adric. And the Brigadier if he can count.)
FoolishWanderer
Mar 5, 2006 @ 4:31 am
Adric? You must explain this. Please!
Frelling Tralk
Mar 5, 2006 @ 9:14 am
I didn't mind the visits back to earth during season 1. But I'm hoping that season 2 will see them getting away from that dreary estate, and out exploring alien worlds more. Maybe it was necessary for the transition period, and I like both Jackie and Mickey, but I'm ready to move on now.
xtreme
Mar 5, 2006 @ 10:09 am
And the Brigadier if he can count
Of course the Brigadier counts, he was the Jackie Tyler of his time, except that
he never slapped the Doctor
Kid Dork
Mar 5, 2006 @ 10:33 am
I never really thought Peri's boobs were all that big. I think fan fiction writers did, and so did John Nathan Turner. Which would explain all the naff Eighties crapwear he put Nicola Bryant in.
I think Peri really came into her own as a companion with the Big Finish audios, so I'll agree with you that she wasn't the best companion then, FoolishWanderer.
As for Rose, I adore her. And it's not just because of the way she fills out a pair of blue jeans. I like the fact that Rose is so not-Hollywood: she's a little heavier than the average starlet, her hair is often a mess, and her beauty is more of character than of pin up girl gorgeous.
Oh, and Billie Piper can act. That helps.
Tirtzah
Mar 5, 2006 @ 10:37 am
Frelling Tralk,
I didn't mind the visits back to earth during season 1. But I'm hoping that season 2 will see them getting away from that dreary estate, and out exploring alien worlds more. Maybe it was necessary for the transition period, and I like both Jackie and Mickey, but I'm ready to move on now.
This may be very slightly spoilerish for the second season:
I believe in the commentary for "The Christmas Invasion" (from the BBC website) RTD and Julie Gardner said that they would be trying to explore more alien worlds in the next season.As for Rose, I adore her. And it's not just because of the way she fills out a pair of blue jeans. I like the fact that Rose is so not-Hollywood: she's a little heavier than the average starlet, her hair is often a mess, and her beauty is more of character than of pin up girl gorgeous.
I agree
Kid Dork, she's not the cookie cutter Hollywood-type beauty. She's a very pretty but normal looking girl who is obviousl athletic (all that running around), but not a twig. In later season of Buffy I always had a hard time buying her kicking ass when SMG looked like a strong wind might snap her in half. I also really love Rose's wardrobe, jeans and t-shirts and little hoodie jackets, nothing too flashy. The kind of comfortable clothing normal girls wear all the time.
Just'sin
Mar 6, 2006 @ 8:15 am
My favourite traditional companions - Sarah Jane, Leela, the Romanas - never just simpered. They always did something.
Sarah Jane ALWAYS had the guts, even in her first outing with the Thrid Doctor she was great. Lying her way into the top secret science think tank? Now that's what I call proactive. I just couldn't see Rose being able to do that. And for all of this subtext in the new series, the closeness of Sarah Jane and the Fourth Doctor is unbeatable.
The only traditional companion I can remember liking was Leela and that was because she looked cool and tried to knife people.
HAH! So true. Leela is great because she's feisty and her first instinct is protect herself. She doesn't scream once in The Face of Evil or The Robots of Death and she only screams in The Talons of Weng Chiang because there is a giant rat chomping on her lower half.
I feel that Rose is planted half way between these two, but does not compare to either. I feel that Rose isn't as good as these companions. I don't know why. It's not the character, but rather I feel that I am being forced to like her. Maybe it was the constant press about Rose being so DIFFERENT from any other companion. If I hadn't had to wade through all that crap, I would enjoy her a lot more.
Part of me also believes that if Ace had been better written, she would have been like Rose. She was also another non-screamer. I don't remember her ever screaming.
Also,
why does the Doctor have to fancy Rose? It drives me CRAZY! I guess I have a problem with the way Russell T Davies is writing the series.
I know the show had to move with the times, but the gay characters and jarring romantic subtext is really grating at times.
B. Will
Mar 6, 2006 @ 9:04 am
Just'sin:Lying her way into the top secret science think tank? Now that's what I call proactive. I just couldn't see Rose being able to do that.
I have to agree with you there, especially after watching her
try to tell the Sycorax to sod off in "The Christmas Invasion." Rose just didn't have the confidence to do it, while I think Romana or Sarah Jane certainly would.It's not the character, but rather I feel that I am being forced to like her.
I rather like Rose, but I have to agree with you here. Throughout the first series, it felt like
we were being beaten over the head with how much we should love Rose, because so many characters (The Doctor, Captain Jack, Adam) were instantly and completely devoted to her.
Nuallain
Mar 6, 2006 @ 10:08 am
I've heard the argument that she's a Mary Sue
I can't buy that, simply because a 6'7" 40something gay middle class Welshmen writing himself into the series as a 17 year old English working class girl would be... a cunning disguise to put it mildly.
Captain Jack would be a better candidate for Mary Sue status, except for it being Steven Moffatt who made him that "RTD Meets James Bond" way, not RTD.
fadooski
Mar 6, 2006 @ 5:00 pm
My thing with Rose is that I cannot imagine her having any adventures of her own. What exactly is she going to do once she stops travelling with the Doctor? I can't imagine her going back to school to get a career, nor can I imagine her living her life on an alien world. Really, she's just going to move back in with her mom find a customer service job and try to reel in Mickey again She's dependent on the Doctor in a way that clashes with the heroic way that we're supposed to see her.
Sarah Jane's first story had her operating independently of the Doctor till towards the end. My favourite scene from The Time Warrior was when she's talking to the 'good' nobleman, his wife and his head knight about capturing the doctor. They're all "Oh, hell no! we can't" and she's like: "What's wrong with you people? We do it like a commando raid or something. We knock out the guards, sneak in grab the Doctor and get out!"
Contrast this with every time Rose has been faced with a situation on her own. She cries for the Doctor to come and fix things. To her, he's a knight in shining armor who dazzles her with sophisticated technology, holds her hand, stares into her eyes, and saves her from monsters. Sarah-Jane was her own knight.
And I totally agree with Just'sin, the way Rose was marketed as a 'new' companion for the 21st century made me roll my eyes. Doctor who doesn't need to be like Buffy or any other sci-fi show. It has decades of it's own history that makes it distinct within genre TV.
I have a question: what does everyone think of Rose being so young? She's not the only one. Susan, Ace, Adric and Nyssa were about 15 or 16. Peri was about the same age as Rose. Turlough was supposed to be a schoolboy. Lots of the Doctor's comapnions were adolescents. However, a good number of them were grown men and women too. How does Rose being a younger companion fit into the show returning? And, for those who've seen the show, how does it affect you perception of the erotic tension between her and the Doctor?
Promethea
Mar 6, 2006 @ 6:42 pm
Hang on, did you see the last episode? Wasn't that precisely the point, that Rose had the option of returning to her old life but she couldn't do it; she did take action, came up with a plan (with the help of Mickey and Jackie) and went to save the Doctor. She explicitly said that she'd been shown a new way of living, a better way, that entailed not giving up and trying to do the right thing, and clearly had internalised it. Okay, she wasn't this heroic capable figure from day one (although there were flashes, such as swinging to the rescue in episode one, taking the initiative to find an escape route downwards in The Doctor Dances, etc) but that's what she became.
furrylump
Mar 7, 2006 @ 6:16 am
Rose gets in trouble every episode, but she still isn't just there to be saved. She's not quite the Lana Lang I think because she has opinions and takes action on them. However I do think she can be a huge idiot sometimes. She's almost rivalling Medium's Allison. The best example of this would have to be the first half of The Empty/Unearthly Child, which, by the way, was super funny. Which in itself is kinda funny, because you go over to the comments on the ep for the BBC site and a lot of them say how terrifying it was, and a lot of the episode I was roaring with laughter. That's like this time I rented The Grudge on DVD, and for me, the best bit was when I watched that bit where Yoko was slowly walking down the steps, and I found out if I played it in fast foward she was doing what looked like drunken penguin walking. Seriously if you have it or rent it, try that. And I've just been babbling and have gone completely off topic.
Back on track, I wish she remembered what happened while she was full of TARDIS soul and stuff.
EllycatinOz
Mar 7, 2006 @ 6:49 pm
Rose gets in trouble every episode...she has opinions and takes action on them. However I do think she can be a huge idiot sometimes
Yes I like that she is both. Makes her more "beleivable" and easier to identify with. It is hard as a woman (or as a girl as I was then) to identify with the helpless, scream-y, fall over and hurt ankle kind of companion. I think new audiences have a better companion with Rose.
I agree with Promethea. Rose rocked in that last epi and had *gasp* evolved!!!!!
Fadooski asks re Rose's youth.
Ok. I think she is young (I thought she was 19 but there you go) to encourage new young viewers who didnt grow up watching the old doctor so that is why she was cast.
As to the subtext thing which is often complained of by oldfans, I think it's a good thing. Yes I'm a sook and romantic but they do emphasise his loneliness and for me it is nice he finds someone.
He is the last TimeLord after all - he can't hang with his own species. He loves humanity for the most part - so what other species is there?!!!
Jacob
Mar 7, 2006 @ 9:52 pm
1) "Who's the Best Companion" can have its own thread. This one's about Rose.
2) Please check out the Site FAQ on what constitutes a spoiler. Even though it's a bit special thanks to the circumstance, speculation is still not considered spoilage. Thanks.
Hieronymo
Mar 10, 2006 @ 3:50 pm
Oh gosh, I hate Rose so much. I find it very hard to deal with, because I like all the other bits, but, oh, how much I hate her. I think my dislike boils down to her being
offensively moronic. That bit where
she suddenly realises that since they're in the future, and the earth is dying, that means that her mum is dead? Seriously? What is the Doctor doing with someone that stupid? Or when
she can't go back to her old life because she wants to be someone who does "the right thing"? Does it not even occur to her that she could, I don't know,
go and do voluntary work in the third world, or set up a homeless shelter, or one of the other millions of proactive things that other people do when they feel like they want to make something of their lives??
It doesn't even seem to occur to her that there are options other than A) Provide vague assistance to the Doctor in his glamourous travels or B) Hang around with her equally moronic friends and relatives for ever and ever. I need more examples - I don't have DVDs or transcripts - but she spends most of her time acting seriously dense. She hasn't learnt anything from her 'adventures'; she's just as unimaginative and self-centred as she was when she started. The only time she's not being passive is when she's actually being aggressively stupid.
Phew. I have now become the nutty ranter. But it needed to be said.
Oh, and
fadooski - sorry to contaminate you with my blind, near-psychotic fury, but I agree with much of what you said. Especially this:
My thing with Rose is that I cannot imagine her having any adventures of her own. What exactly is she going to do once she stops travelling with the Doctor? I can't imagine her going back to school to get a career, nor can I imagine her living her life on an alien world. Really, she's just going to move back in with her mom find a customer service job and try to reel in Mickey again She's dependent on the Doctor in a way that clashes with the heroic way that we're supposed to see her.
fadooski
Mar 12, 2006 @ 6:05 pm
I found it really interesting when Rose encounters Lynda in the Parting of the Ways. She was obviously jealous and visibly threatened. Here's the Doctor, her Doctor and he's holding hands with this chick who's prettier, more likeable and most importantly, smarter than Rose I wonder how she'd manage if the Doctor took on another female companion.
Gaymo
Mar 14, 2006 @ 5:55 am
Believe me, I've seen much better young British actresses (so, it's not like they haven't got the talent or anything). Perhaps it also doesn't help that I think that Billie Piper is not exactly attractive in my eyes (though I do know that in Britain her type is considered to be very attractive).
I have no clue what you're talking about. Blondes? Women? People with blue eyes? People with two eyes? What a massive generalisation about British people. If I could understand what you were saying I'm sure I'd be quite offended...
I like Rose, mainly because she's very rooted in the modern human experience, with the emotional baggage that comes with it. When I first heard the choice of companion I didn't expect much, having lived through Billie Piper's pop career (if you can call it that) and her marriage to Sir Chris of Evans. But I was pleased with her performance. I'm continually pleased with it. I mean, they could do a lot worse. See, for me,
Doctor Who isn't so much about tip-top acting and fine performances; it's more about the story, the experience, the tacky camp nature of the show that was so prevalent when I first started watching it.
There were a lot of episodes that seemed very serious to me; that tended to err on the side of darkness rather than tacky or camp. I like this direction, mainly because it gives Rose more to do. And she plays such an integral part to The Doctor's experience that ultimately gives
him a new way to see humans.
Skyrocket
Mar 17, 2006 @ 8:55 am
I like Rose quite a bit. She's got a way to go before she beats out old faves like Liz, Romana, Tegan and Nyssa, but she's pretty cool.
I'd say she's already more popular with fans than poor ol' Adric ever was. :(
(actually liked Adric)
Warden
Mar 18, 2006 @ 2:38 pm
Upon my first viewing of "Rose/TEotW", I would have to say that I like Rose. Granted she has a ways to go to making the role of companion her own (own characterization anyway) but I liked the way she swooped down and help the Doctor in the first episode and her emotional display in the second episode (the two scenes in particular with the first being her conversation with Cassandra and at the second at the end with the Doctor). Two different emotional sides but on a balanced plane.
Also, she struck me as a fairly attractive lady. Young or old, she would qualify as eye candy.
Kalbear
Mar 18, 2006 @ 10:15 pm
I'm still astounded at how hot she really is. I don't even know why she's so damn attractive; perhaps it's the fact that she actually has a figure and doesn't look like a concentration camp victim, perhaps it's the perfect nose and cute smile. She's just strikingly gorgeous.
MDKNIGHT
Mar 19, 2006 @ 1:57 am
I've only just seen the first two eps of the 9th doctor and I don't know how Rose will develop but I like her so far. She's neither a damsel in distress nor a super hero but that is OK. My fav companion was Leela because she was Tom Baker's Doctor's complete opossite, a violent savage, yet very loyal and helpful. So far Rose is helpful but is nowhere near as tough as Leela. That makes sense, she wasn't born into a warrior society. I thought anybody would be upset at watching the end of thier home world, even if they knew it was billions of years in the future. It would be very sad. I don' know how I'd feel if on top of that the "last human" was a vain murderous greedy bitch. Not how I'd like my species to go out. As for somebody'd complain upthread that they couldn't see what Rose will do with herself once she no longer travels with the doctor (that is not a spoiler as I don't know when this will happen only that all companion's travels do end eventually) well I think it is a little unfair to judge her since she's very young. She has time to mature (assuming she doesn't get killed like Adric) and find a calling or a purpose (like Nissa). Remember that most of the other companions were older so most went back to the lives they had before as flight attendants or reporters. The younger ones tended to do some growing up and I have no reason to believe that won't be the case with Rose.
ETA Just a guess but maybe what the poster meant about Brit "types" might be referring to American culture being obssessed with being SUPER thin....in fact I thought the whole Cassandra thing was meant to be a dig at AMERICAN standards of beauty remember Cassandra's dad was a Texan...(and her mom was from antartica).Neither parent was British. Maybe the poster thinks British guys like women to have a little meat on the bone as it were. I don't know it that is true or not, but I can tell you that in Latino cultures there is such a thing as too thin and some American women thought of as beautiful are not as popular in some Latino cultures. My mom thinks Sarah Michelle Geller looks like a boy.
Jacob
Mar 20, 2006 @ 1:59 am
I think that will serve nicely as the last word on the "type" stuff.
swannlore
Mar 20, 2006 @ 6:33 pm
What I like about Rose is that she is an original character, and not just a recycled character. I find Billie Piper to be a fine addition to the Dr. Who mythos. Not to mention she is super cute. Yes, I'm twelve.
Yannick
Mar 20, 2006 @ 10:34 pm
I like Rose a lot. I think they have created a very believable and likeable character with her.
A Real Scotty
Mar 21, 2006 @ 9:07 pm
I have been pleasantly surprised by Rose - and Billie Piper. When I heard she had the role, I was very nervous. I hadn't heard of her, but UK friends of mine had told me she was some kind of pop starlet, famous for marrying a radio personality. I groaned.
But - I thought she did a very good job in Season 1. I really felt for her in a number of episodes, and am glad she'll be around for Season 2, at least.
I grew up in the UK, and Sarah Jane is da bomb! She is the true Doctor Who companion, IMO. I thought Neela was pretty good, too. I have a little fondness for Jo Manning, since she is the earliest one I really remember.
ditz99
Mar 21, 2006 @ 10:08 pm
I thought she had a bit of Ace in her, actually.
FoolishWanderer
Mar 22, 2006 @ 1:28 am
A Real Scotty without seeming like I'm snarking on you, I think you've got a couple of the names wrong. Leela and Jo Grant are the correct names.
Knots Landing
Mar 22, 2006 @ 1:56 pm
So far, I really don't think she's that pretty. She has a general good look, but those clothes made her look fat and did her figure no favors. But I will say that when she was a pop singer she was VERY VERY hot! I liked a couple of her songs, this is why I decided to watch this show. Hopefully her hotness will improve, but right now I'm not seeing it, on this show at least.
Hotness aside, I am loving Rose! I know absolutely nothing about Doctor Who so she might not be as good as previous Rose's , but I'm enjoying her. Her voice remind me of Denny on Bad Girls, her personality as well, except dumber and more feminine.
Loving her chemistry with The Doctor and she's a main reason I'm going to keep watching. Now if only Billie would go back to her pop career! I loved that.
BTW, ages ago I recall hearing she might not be in the second season, what happened with that?
lidja
Mar 22, 2006 @ 7:03 pm
Rose (Billie Piper) will be in the second season, but I think she might have more competition for The Doctor's full attention.
A Real Scotty
Mar 22, 2006 @ 11:40 pm
Thanks, foolishwanderer, that's what happens when you're typing and not thinking. I think I mixed Jo's name with the actress who played her (Katy Manning). As for Leela, I think my brain was getting crossed with ST:VOY for some unknown reason - Neelix, anyone?!
FoolishWanderer
Mar 23, 2006 @ 6:16 am
Neelix, anyone?!
How could you get them confused? Neelix is so much prettier than Leela!
No, I kid. And just grossed myself out.
MC_Hamster
Mar 23, 2006 @ 9:43 am
BTW, ages ago I recall hearing she might not be in the second season, what happened with that?
Newspaper speculation. She's definitely in the second series.