I think they kind of made it impossible for Toral to contribute even if she wanted to, and she knew that. I think she didn't want to be PM because she was very aware they were planning to undermine her, no matter what.[/quote]
I agree that Kristi, Felisha, (and maybe Alla) were aligned against her. But Toral had Marshawn and Jennifer who were at least neutral, and Rebecca in her corner. She should have fought to be PM, and shown that she could manage a difficult team. She would have also had the chance to separate the clique. If they did try to undermine her, she'd have had ammunition against them in the boardroom.
As horrible as the clique is, I do believe they would have at least made the effort to win. I don't think they would have voted to give her immunity if they won, unless she did something extraordinary. But bitchy as they are, I do think they probably wanted to win more than they hated Toral.
I don't really think they made it impossible for Toral to contribute. To be honest, "Blizzamarole", was a horrible idea, nonsensical and no better than Zip. They weren't helpful or friendly at the beginning of the task, to be sure, and they became shrieking harpies by the end.
But by becoming PM, which I think they would have allowed her to do had she shown any enthusiasm, Toral would have had some control over her fate. As it was, by basically refusing to be PM, and refusing to put on the costume, she sabotaged herself. Kristi & Co. didn't help, but Toral was stupid and ineffectual for not even trying to really contribute. She wasn't even professional enough to put on a neutral face in front of the executives at the presentation. That was inexcusable, whatever her private feelings, IMO.
The ones who were out to get her will pay for how they acted. For one thing, they've been seen on national TV by prospective employers, as well as friends and family members acting terribly unprofessional. But that doesn't change the fact that Toral had a brief window of opportunity to prove herself after her dismal performance in the previous task, and she failed utterly.
blockedwriter, the "bitch" comment was only on the CNBC repeat, not the NBC first-run. ITA with what you said about the snotterviews. [/quote]
Thanks for the information about the CNBC repeat. I watched that, but I must have zoned out on that part. They really do overuse those one-on-one interviews, don't they?
Brinswan
Oct 15, 2005 @ 10:37 pm
Actually, I watched the NBC Thursday night Apprentice and heard the "Bitch" comment from Kristi loud and clear.
My eyes are blue with a black ring around them, and I don't wear contacts, colored or otherwise.
I'm going to give Toral the benefit of the doubt and not believe that she was kicked out of Columbia for cheating until thesmokinggun.com or some other website verifies that dirt. It seems too ridiculous that someone so concerned with personal honor would do something so shameful. Although with these winners, I suppose you never know . . .
sleazydinosaur
Oct 16, 2005 @ 12:57 am
It seems too ridiculous that someone so concerned with personal honor would do something so shameful.[/quote]
She admitted to not really trying in any of the tasks, and she lied repeatedly in the boardroom. She is obviously not concerned with personal honor, she just likes to use the buzz words as yet another excuse. I have no problem believing she was caught cheating.
BuonGiorno
Oct 16, 2005 @ 1:07 am
It seems too ridiculous that someone so concerned with personal honor would do something so shameful. Although with these winners, I suppose you never know . . . [/quote]
For honest folk it may seem ridiculous and unnecessary to be so concerned about personal honor. Cheaters, on the other hand, whose honor is in question, may need to talk about their honor excessively in hopes to boost it up.
In Toral's case, it seems like she was simply making up lame excuses.
blueguy
Oct 16, 2005 @ 8:01 am
Toral's statements that wearing the costume would damage her reputation may or may not have merit. And, I think it a moot point now to continue arguing over it. However, what she did do that damaged her reputation beyond this show and beyond repair (imo) was to lie. Trump caught her in a few and I'm certain she was lying to Rebbecca from the start just so she would have an ally (at least for a while).
Toral claims to be an investment banker. Well, with all the investment scandals going aroung these days - I would think that anyone in investment banking would be trying to portray an image of complete honesty and integrity. Toral definately did not portray either!
Would you believe what she had to say about a particular investment opportunity or stock? Not me. She may have looked silly in the costume, but that would not affect my trust in her abilities as an investment banker. What does affect my trust in her abilities is her - what seems like - an eager willingness to stretch the truth when it suits her. Someone working as an investment banker and most likely on commission sales should not so readily stretch the truth or lie. It undermines confidence in the person and the institution they work for.
Toral said she was worried about what her clients would think - ahem - her clients should be worried about her and what she is thinking! Who's interest is Toral serving?
Toral - if you were giving investment advice to me - I would consider the source and then move on to the next company!
My Way
Oct 16, 2005 @ 8:27 am
Re the coloured contact lenses debate. I don't really have an opinion on the subject, but the maternal side of my family is from the Caribbean, with East Indian lineage (would that be the correct term?). A couple of my cousins have green/hazel eyes. One is mixed (like me), but the other isn't. And she doesn't wear contact lenses.
All that to say, I don't know if Toral actually wears them, but it's possible that is her natural eye colour.[/quote]
Thanks
Lily Bart. I am also highly skeptical of people's ability to tell if someone wears colored contacts, because I get asked about 20 times a year if I wear contacts. I guess I have a "tell tale ring" of color (blue) around my pupils that is different than the rest of my eyes (green), but it's totally natural. So I'm not really ready to start an analysis on Toral based on her alledged color contacts. She has been enough of a bitch that we don't really need that amo, IMO.
I wonder what Toral's attitude would have been if Felicia had said, "Okay, we are going to draw straws to see who wears the costume."[/quote]
I don't know if she still would have worn it, but I think her attitude would have been better. I would have been pissed off if some bitchy girls who had been sidelining me the whole project tried to force me to wear the silly idiotic costume. Look, nobody every really wants to wear the costume, right? That's why the girls should have done the same thing the guys did, and ask for volunteers. The only reason they didn't is because they wanted to humiliate Toral.
So I don't blame her for not having a good attitude about the costume, but if she were as smart as she thinks she is, she would have just worn the thing and she would have been safe.
Everything she said, they turned on her, as with the "Blizzamarole" thing she suggested that turned them into salivating hyena bitches.[/quote] To be honest, "Blizzamarole", was a horrible idea, nonsensical and no better than Zip.[/quote]
I agree that "Blizzamarole" was a stupid idea but it was better than zip in one critical way, it tied back to dairy queen and the product. Zip was just completely unrelated to Dairy Queen or the product, so in that way it was worse. Maybe if they had used brainstorming in the way it is supposed to be used, rather than screaming like harpies to shoot that idea down, they could have said, hey, Blizzamarole is stupid but maybe we could work a name with blizzard in the title somehow that fits better. Instead they just screamed at her, which is so very, very bad for a brainstorming session.
AdrienneP
Oct 16, 2005 @ 8:40 am
I agree that Kristi, Felisha, (and maybe Alla) were aligned against her. But Toral had Marshawn and Jennifer who were at least neutral, and Rebecca in her corner. She should have fought to be PM, and shown that she could manage a difficult team. [/quote]
I agree blockedwriter, especially since Trumpie himself called her out at the very beginning of the show and said, "Toral, I'm expecting great things from you..." She knew from the very beginning of the task that she was under the gun and still held back from being PM or contributing in any significant way. Her every move was being scrutinized, so she should have made MORE of an effort, IMO, and probably in Trump's as well.
I think even if she had given in and worn the costume she probably would still have been fired. Trumpie was gunning for her from last week, and wearing the costume alone wouldn't have saved her.
blocked writer
Oct 16, 2005 @ 8:58 am
I think even if she had given in and worn the costume she probably would still have been fired. Trumpie was gunning for her from last week, and wearing the costume alone wouldn't have saved her. [/quote]
It's quite possible that Trump would have still fired Toral if she had worn the costume, but I'm not convinced, AdrienneP. The crux of the argument was why she wouldn't wear the costume, and whether or not she was telling the truth about why she wouldn't do it.
Had she worn the costume, there would have never have been that line of questioning. Then the only strike against her would have been her failure to become PM. Had she been smart, she would have just pushed to be PM, and they wouldn't have had that argument in the first place.
I do agree that Trump was watching Toral closely after Rebecca defended her so staunchly. But I do think he would have given his "Wharton Grad" a fair chance had she made any real effort to prove herself.
fposte
Oct 16, 2005 @ 9:59 am
As horrible as the clique is, I do believe they would have at least made the effort to win[/quote]
And that's why in a "Death is not an option" situation I go for the Kristi/Felisha alliance over Toral--I think they would have still wanted the team to win even with Toral leading it, whereas she demonstrably wanted the team to lose. Yes, people were mean to her, but it's not an excuse to back out in this situation. She's justified in being unhappy, not in sucking.
Rose Dawn Scott
Oct 16, 2005 @ 10:06 am
Had she worn the costume, there would have never have been that line of questioning. Then the only strike against her would have been her failure to become PM. Had she been smart, she would have just pushed to be PM, and they wouldn't have had that argument in the first place.[/quote]
ITA, blocked writer. In fact, if her team had lost while she was PM, she'd have had an excuse with some merit -- she could say that her team had deliberately sabotauged her, dragged their feet, thrown the task, whatever. It's entirely possible Trump would've come back with the "you've got to be able to lead if you want to work for me" argument and fired her anyway, but "I didn't want to PM because it wasn't THE task for me, and I didn't want to wear the costume because I have religious objections" -- that's two lame excuses for the price of one. OTOH, if Toral had agreed to PM, it's very possible the Kristis really would've tried to drag her down, giving her some legitimacy, and Trump at the least I believe would've questioned the rest of the team closely about anything that looked like throwing the task so they could play Get Toral.
It seems obvious that Trump was expecting Toral to take the PM task. Since she didn't, she was already marked -- twice, after Rebecca's save. Refusing to wear the silly costume was the third strike. Bye, Toral: Unforgettable Business Genius! I look forward to the coming ouster of Kristi and Felisha.
I know the "contrast" was a deliberate set-up, but when Toral came back to the suite after Jen W. went bye-bye, the women had a talk and decided to "start fresh"...then the Kristis continued acting like Kristis and Toral continued acting like Toral. After the Markus trainwreck, the men had a talk and agreed to "start fresh" also...and apparently managed to pull it off. (at least to the point of squeaking by on the tasks, not that their wins have been in any way brilliant.)
TheLady2
Oct 16, 2005 @ 10:27 am
After the Markus trainwreck, the men had a talk and agreed to "start fresh" also...and apparently managed to pull it off.[/quote]
Which is why I like the men's team so much better than the catty women's team.
AdrienneP
Oct 16, 2005 @ 10:44 am
I know the "contrast" was a deliberate set-up, but when Toral came back to the suite after Jen W. went bye-bye, the women had a talk and decided to "start fresh"...then the Kristis continued acting like Kristis and Toral continued acting like Toral. [/quote]
The only thing I would say to that, in Kristi's defense (and I am in NO WAY condoning the rest of her or the Uniblondes actions, I really can't stand her) is that when they were having that talk, Kristi came right out and said, "...don't hang back Toral, you owe it to Rebecca after she stuck her neck out for you, and if slack off in any way I'll be all over you..." That didn't make an impact on me on Thursday's viewing, but when I watched the repeat Friday night it stuck right out. So Toral knew that not only was Trumpie watching her, but the whole team was expecting her to contribute. Not that she cared what her team thought. Yet she still stuck to her "strategy" of letting the team fail. And she was almost gleeful about their failure as well, because it "proved" her point that they were incompetent, which is even more reprehensible.
Yes, the line of questioning that finally derailed her was the costume, and it's possible that had she worn it she might not have been fired. But Toral's performance on that task was everyone's focus, so I still think Trumpie would have found another reason to let her go. She'd already been given a break when Rebecca didn't bring her into the boardroom. I think the only thing that might have saved her was being PM.
BibiBella
Oct 16, 2005 @ 10:46 am
especially since Trumpie himself called her out at the very beginning of the show and said, "Toral, I'm expecting great things from you..." She knew from the very beginning of the task that she was under the gun and still held back from being PM or contributing in any significant way. Her every move was being scrutinized, so she should have made MORE of an effort, IMO, and probably in Trump's as well. [/quote]
And this underscores both how stupid and how arrogant Toral is...she knew Trump was looking for her to show her smarts/skills and she knew that everyone else was too...yet she still thought she could get by with doing nothing. WTF?
She honestly is one of those people who think that "being themselves" is enough to warrant all the good things in life...thus no effort from her, yet complete expectation that she'd be kept on the team.
kerfoker
Oct 16, 2005 @ 10:56 am
But by becoming PM, which I think they would have allowed her to do had she shown any enthusiasm, Toral would have had some control over her fate. As it was, by basically refusing to be PM, and refusing to put on the costume, she sabotaged herself.[/quote]
That's where Toral lost, by not being the PM when she had the opportunity to do so so she lost control over what her performance would be based on in that task. And as far as tasks go, creating a mascot wasn't that difficult I think. The men's effort didn't seem that impressive and I thought the DQ executives were laughing at the presentation (not with the men!). I keep wondering why DQ doesn't use some sort of queen for its mascot?
auntiemame
Oct 16, 2005 @ 11:13 am
Toral claims to be an investment banker. Well, with all the investment scandals going aroung these days - I would think that anyone in investment banking would be trying to portray an image of complete honesty and integrity. Toral definately did not portray either!
Would you believe what she had to say about a particular investment opportunity or stock? Not me. She may have looked silly in the costume, but that would not affect my trust in her abilities as an investment banker. What does affect my trust in her abilities is her - what seems like - an eager willingness to stretch the truth when it suits her. Someone working as an investment banker and most likely on commission sales should not so readily stretch the truth or lie. It undermines confidence in the person and the institution they work for.[/quote]
I love your point. Toral is like the Jack Grubman of the Apprentice. (Grubman was the research analyst who kept issuing "buy" ratings on Worldcom so investors would buy the stock, even though he knew it was crap.) And her former employers must be intensely embarrassed. Investment bankers don't advise individuals on what stocks to buy, though -- they advise companies on what other companies to buy, and how to raise money.
As it was, by basically refusing to be PM, and refusing to put on the costume, she sabotaged herself.[/quote]
I don't think she so much sabotaged herself, as she fell into their trap. The team had set up a brilliant catch-22: if she became PM, they would sabotage her,("we're just not motivated" redux) and if she didn't become PM they would sabotage her. And no matter what she did, Trump had decided last week he would fire her. Her firing was predestined, IMO. And, faced with the realization that she would 'fail' no matter what she did, she took the approach many other people do under the same pressure: complete passivity.
Lisetta
Oct 16, 2005 @ 11:52 am
Speaking of the evils of lying (...Toral...)....Doesn't Trump feel embarrassed for his own lies?
Last season he should have been bragging about what a great job Kendra did, how talented she is, and that he's lucky the show finds such quality people to work for him.
Instead, he was contemptuous of the TA3 contestants and bragged about how TA4 were superior to them in every way, were all hand-picked by Trump himself for their incredible abilities, personality and gorgeousness.
"This is an incredible group of tremendous candidates...the most beautfiul that we've ever had....blah, blah, blah".
WTH? Can anyone look at these people as a group and say they stand out as overall superior in any way to TA1, TA2, or TA3? I don't see any difference at all (except that Kendra and Bill would have still been superior to anything we've seen so far from this bunch).
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.