Scrambled Eggs
Jan 9, 2004 @ 11:34 am
Playing By Heart was on A&E last night, so I saw it for the first time. GA was great--kind of funny that her height played a role, and I guess the writers couldn't resist having her speak a line with the word "spooky" in it. But the movie should have had fewer plotlines.
bmills
Jan 9, 2004 @ 1:52 pm
I saw the movie a while ago and thought that it was flawed, but quite likeable. Of course, my favorite part was the GA/Jon Stewart subplot. I especially enjoy the dinner scene where GA drops something off of her fork. It looks ad-libbed, and it's fun to watch our favorite actress run through about four mood changes in a fraction of a second as she gets embarrassed, wonders whether Jon notices, and decides to keep nonchallantly playing the scene.
Kanel
Jan 9, 2004 @ 3:08 pm
Oh, yeah, that was a good one! She's a real pro.
I love that movie (plotline jungle or no). There's so much great acting, it's a joy to watch.
greenshirt
Jan 17, 2004 @ 6:31 pm
GA will apparently be performing in a
play entitled "The Sweetest Swing in Baseball" in which her character's name is Dana. Hips before hands anyone?
ejluther
Jan 18, 2004 @ 9:44 pm
cool. will anyone who posts here be able to see it? and, color me optimistic, but is it possible that GA is doing a play rather than a film because she's got another film role coming down the pike? you know what i mean; a smarty, sassy and sensational redhead who likes to kick ass and kiss foreheads?
Kanel
Jan 19, 2004 @ 5:53 am
I admire your subtlety, ejluther, and let's keep hoping for the best!
Glasgow
Jan 19, 2004 @ 9:25 am
i'll defs be going to see it.
Kanel
Jan 19, 2004 @ 4:07 pm
Great, Glasgow! Keep us posted!
pusher
Jan 20, 2004 @ 11:26 am
I went to London in December and got a chance to see GA in What The Night Is For. As much as I'd love to go back to London, I'd be leery of seeing The Sweetest Swing In Baseball. I did not like her performance in WTNIF.
I am curious how she does in the show, though. Please let us know, Glasgow.
JimsBride
Jan 20, 2004 @ 1:56 pm
I just don't think the play itself looks very interesting. Perhaps it's just the way the description is written or maybe it's my dislike of plays and movies set in psychiatric hospitals.
Glasgow
Jan 21, 2004 @ 4:44 am
oh, great, it's set in a psych ward? i didn't pick that up, i only scanned the page. ah, well, might be good for a laugh. except the Royal Court is not the sort of place where you can laugh if it isn't intntionally funny.
ejluther
Jan 21, 2004 @ 1:26 pm
I did not like her performance in WTNIF
Perhaps you've covered this already, if so, I think I missed it. Why didn't you like her performance? The play ultimately closed early, yes? Perhaps you weren't the only one less than thrilled with it and her...
pusher
Jan 21, 2004 @ 6:08 pm
I honestly don't remember the specifics of what she did and didn't do. I remember not empathizing with her character at all. I didn't believe she was this woman in this moral dilemma (and not in a "she'll always be Scully" way). After 9 years on TV, it's tough to go back to theater and she picked a challenging two-person play. Maybe her next performance will flow more naturally.
snarkcake
Jan 21, 2004 @ 6:54 pm
I saw the performance too, and like Pusher, I wasn't thrilled. She was definitely not Scully. As I recall, I found the performance very mannered and actorly (think: Acting! Thank you!) in the first half - the premise is that two lovers are reuniting after 20 or so years, so I think her mannerisms were supposed to reflect her unease and discomfort and the secrets she is keeping. But I found it all very stagey and unconvincing.
She was better in the second half, and had an amazing angry phone meltdown scene. It was somewhat the play, somewhat the performance. I've seen way worse and I'd eagerly see her in another play. Can't afford London this go round, though.
pusher
Jan 22, 2004 @ 10:27 am
That was the big thing. Thank you snarkcake. The first half needed to be very subtlely played and she (for lack of a better term) overacted her way through it. I also thought the second act perfoemance wasn't as bad if just for the fact that overacting could be hidden in the "amazing angry phone meltdown scene."
ejluther
Jan 22, 2004 @ 11:19 am
I'm just glad to see/hear/know that GA can pull off being "not Scully" - even if the performance itself is not that great, you know? I fear DD always smacks of Fox Mulder when I see him in other roles. Granted, I've not seen too much of him in other things, but his style seems to remain much the same. Not a slam to DD, maybe he just hasn't had a variety of roles offered to him or I've just not seen the "right" projects that he's done that showcase his range.
Glasgow
Jan 22, 2004 @ 11:26 am
he does sometimes get to do stuff where he smiles. or parts his hair differently. or rides a push bike. or - recently a very good example - he gets to grow a beard. it's not like he's totally limited.
i'm about to start reading HoM, and when i've finished it i'll rent the movie. is it an indication of how small my life is that i'm looking forward to it? no, wait, i'm thinking of how i got home early last night to see the start of new ER.
ejluther
Jan 22, 2004 @ 11:33 am
well, if it's any consolation, i did the same thing; purposefully read House of Mirth before seeing the film - anticipating both a great deal. I enjoyed them but felt the film had some easily corrected problems. Still, GA is quite wonderful in it.
As for ER? Can't help you there. Never watched it. But I have been arranging my life around the new season of AbFab lately - does that count?
Glasgow
Jan 22, 2004 @ 12:14 pm
does it count? ten out of ten for effort, i'd say.
cmb93
Jan 22, 2004 @ 12:33 pm
I'm just glad to see/hear/know that GA can pull off being "not Scully" - even if the performance itself is not that great, you know?
No offense, but that doesn't make much sense to me. If her performance was lousy or she was overacting, that means she can't really pull off anything other than Scully, no? Giving her different dialogue or a different hairstyle or time period (i.e., HoM) does not a versatile performer make.
I think Gillian is a fairly good actress, but definitely not the end-all be-all of acting. There were times in The X-files when I thought she was cringe-worthy, and her crying scenes were so Acting 101 that I couldn't even feel bad for her sometimes. Nothing says emotion like the single glycerine tear gliding down the cheek. *g*
Ah well, I wish her luck with her new play; hope it does better than WTNIF.
Ruby Trample of Woody End
Jan 22, 2004 @ 1:02 pm
Giving her different dialogue or a different hairstyle or time period (i.e., HoM) does not a versatile performer make.
Neither does showing your ass. But that's just me.
Actually I thought her performance in HOM was wonderful. I've sung this tune before. But as an actor, and somebody who has read HOM numerous times and counts it amongst my fave. novels, I found her Lily true to the source material and quite moving.
I haven't seen her on stage so I can't pass judgment, however I do know that for the most part it was the play that was criticized as being weak and not GA's performance.
I do trust and respect the opinions of those who have posted above who did see WTNIF so I have to take their word on her performance. Which was that it wasn't all bad.
I'm not saying she is the end all and be all of actors but I've said it before and I'll say it again. She can act rings around David "shar-pei!face" Duchovny any day.
bmills
Jan 22, 2004 @ 1:09 pm
Before you watch House of Mirth, have a friend confiscate all your sharp objects and shoelaces.
Crow T. Robot
Jan 22, 2004 @ 2:11 pm
Watched All Souls on TNT last night. She does a pretty damn good job in that. Remember the autopsy scene?
ejluther
Jan 22, 2004 @ 2:45 pm
If her performance was lousy or she was overacting, that means she can't really pull off anything other than Scully, no?
I see your point but I guess I was referring to the critique not being along the lines of, "It was like watching Scully on stage, I could never see/hear anything but Scully from GA." Even if all a pony's tricks aren't good, if you've got more than one - you're not a one-trick pony, if you know what I mean, that's all.
And maybe I'm easily impressed but I can't recall any GA scenes on XF that were cringe-worthy. But, as Ruby points out, she may have looked that good to me due in large part to comparison with her co-star. Not that he was always bad, but, to me, he's no GA...
snarkcake
Jan 22, 2004 @ 4:04 pm
If her performance was lousy or she was overacting, that means she can't really pull off anything other than Scully, no?
Not really - she constructed a completely separate character, but didn't nail it. I think Pusher said it best by saying she lacked subtlety. I found myself aware I was watching a performance. But I was watching Gillian Anderson, not Scully. Same as in
House of Mirth, which I think she hit out of the park. My bet is she's trying to find her stage chops again after 10 years on film.
I've sat through a ton of crappy stage production and WtNiF is easily in the upper half of quality. But I kept thinking it should have been better.
I have the same problem with Duchovny as I have with Colin Firth - I am so enamored of their character, who was a perfect fit for their range, seeing them play someone else creeps me out a little. I saw Firth on stage even and it seemed
wrong. Is it related to the fact I would shag Mulder and Mr. Darcy in a heartbeat if they were really real but probably not the actors who play them? Probably.
pusher
Jan 22, 2004 @ 5:20 pm
I was referring to the critique not being along the lines of, "It was like watching Scully on stage, I could never see/hear anything but Scully from GA."
That's exactly what I meant. Her performance was not Scully-like at all in WTNIF.
Even in Playing By Heart (which I loved) I didn't get any sense of Scully-ness, although she could have gone that way with that character.
Kanel
Jan 22, 2004 @ 5:36 pm
I'm not saying she is the end all and be all of actors but I've said it before and I'll say it again. She can act rings around David "shar-pei!face" Duchovny any day.
Hear, hear.
Even in Playing By Heart (which I loved) I didn't get any sense of Scully-ness, although she could have gone that way with that character.
That was my reaction exactly. It was the first non-XF I saw her in, and I was deeply impressed.
I still get blown away every time I see the first "Scully at the counselor's" scene from
Irresistable. You only see her face, and her lines are all calm(ish) and controlled, but her face is oh, so expressive.
I think that's when my first love for GAs acting was born, and I've never quite gotten over it. Ergo, the woman can do no wrong acting-wise. No wrong. No. I said no!
*fingers in ears* La la la! I can't hear yooooouuuu!
Glasgow
Jan 23, 2004 @ 5:48 am
*standing up for Duchovny*
predictable, perhaps, but there you go.
kschica
Jan 23, 2004 @ 5:44 pm
I would imagine GA would struggle a bit on stage. Her ability to convey a range of emotions with her eyes/face are what IMO make her an amazing actress. The film medium, I would imagine, captures this better. I have thought she did well with everything I've seen her do on screen-I read and watched HOM and she absolutely captured Lily Bart IMO.
luv2surf
Jan 30, 2004 @ 5:38 am
Neither does showing your ass. But that's just me.
Word and Hee to that.
I was a gushy twit after HoM so I guess I fall on the side of 'capable at non-Scully' acting. OTOH, theater is a different game so I can't really comment.
Ohh, interesting creepy serendipity: just as I hit reply and started typing, my winamp randomly selected the XF theme remix, wierd! I am relatively new to TWOP and just tripped across this section today. Hallelujah, now I have even more to distract me from school. But I am seriously jonesing for the old days with M/S, esp GA softly singing 'Jeremiah was a bullfrog', *sigh* Good times, good times...
In person, GA was awesome, funny, considerate, polite, etc. and DD, not so much. He came off as a pompous, arrogant, self-centered (need I go on?) jack*ss...and yes, I am a fan of both. My opinions of the two were considerably bolstered and lowered (respectively) after that, but I know people have bad days and in hindsight, I'll give DD the benefit of the doubt (GA too for her share of negative press).
cmb93
Jan 30, 2004 @ 8:17 am
It amuses me when GA's fans just have to bring comments about DD into their defense. Why tear down DD just to build her up? Can't she stand on her own?
I think he's a fine actor and no, I certainly don't think he's a jackass. Whatever.
ejluther
Jan 30, 2004 @ 9:31 am
It amuses me when GA's fans just have to bring comments about DD into their defense.
Oh, I think it's just human nature to compare the two, that's all. Besides, TWOP is the place to be snarky, even if you like the actor...
Ruby Trample of Woody End
Jan 30, 2004 @ 10:12 am
Exactly. What ejluther said. My lovely and talented TWoP friends have accepted that my hatred of DD stems from a horrible candy stealing incident in another life.
Sniff, why can't we all get along? Esp. when talking about two people who don't even know we exist, and wouldn't give a rats ass if they knew in the first place.
As An Amoeba
Jan 30, 2004 @ 3:13 pm
It amuses me when GA's fans just have to bring comments about DD into their defense. Why tear down DD just to build her up? Can't she stand on her own?
Oh, man, does that bring back memories of the good ol' days at alt.tv.x-files. <G> Ah, we were all so passionate then. And young. And cranky. And now it's all slipped through my fingers. Well, except for the cranky.
I think they both stand on their own just fine. I love those crazy kids. Now, make another movie, losers! Chop chop!
Topic: I hadn't seen
these pictures before (the red dress). The necklace scares me. And Clive Anderson (no relation, I presume) is in there! Sweet.
NickChick
Jan 30, 2004 @ 3:43 pm
[Nostalgic voice]Wow -- the alt days -- I remember those. My old Windows 3.1 setup and my Netscape browser.[/Nostalgic voice]
I've been most surprised that she's stayed in the UK and made that her home base. I really thought she'd have gone back to Vancouver after XF wrapped since she kept her home there and that's where Piper lives. More power to her though for really making the time to have a life.
luv2surf
Feb 1, 2004 @ 6:36 am
I think he's a fine actor and no, I certainly don't think he's a jackass. Whatever.
Wow, okay...I thought my comments fell in the acceptable range of snerk, but I guess I've offended where none was intended, and I'm sorry for that.
I was talking about my specific experience with GA and DD in the vein of what y'all were doing (way) upthread. Maybe it wasn't glowing commentary, but I was simply relating what happened. It's not as if I made it up to stir shit for kicks...anyways I guess this is a YMMV moment.
Topic? Nice pics, As An Amoeba. I'm still reeling from the blonde hair, it's just not right darn it!
ejluther
Feb 1, 2004 @ 11:42 am
Forgive me but what does "YMMV" stand for?
Also, the blonde hair is a shock; as for those photos, I don't know whether it's the hair or the dress or the freaky
RED! sea-coral necklace but I've seen GA looking better, that's all I'm sayin'...
Like
here, for example
bmills
Feb 1, 2004 @ 5:11 pm
Why tear down DD just to build her up? Can't she stand on her own?
It's because GA is kind, gentle smart, gorgeous, and talented, whereas DD kicks puppies, robs orphans, is a member of al Qaeda, is a close personal friend of Satan, and has schemed against GA and held her back for years. I thought everybody new that.
Murgandy
Feb 2, 2004 @ 1:19 am
It's because GA is kind, gentle smart, gorgeous, and talented, whereas DD kicks puppies, robs orphans, is a member of al Qaeda, is a close personal friend of Satan, and has schemed against GA and held her back for years. I thought everybody new that.
I don't know why that cracked me up so much, most of the time I don't even mind DD. And on another note, I don't think people mean so much to tear DD down, I think it just comes from them working together so long that it is almost natural to draw comparisons. But I am a huge GA fan, so I guess I am not completely biased either.
Oh, and I am new everyone, so hi!
luv2surf
Feb 2, 2004 @ 2:04 am
ejluther: "Your Mileage May Vary" its in the site
FAQ.
Also, GA does look fab, but I can't look at her and see 'Scully' anymore which I'm sure gives her great joy but makes me a little sad.
Thank you for the hilarity
bmills, I was laughing right along with
Murgandy!
NickChick
Feb 2, 2004 @ 2:25 pm
The still-blonde GA
made a London charity appearance today.
I can't look at her and see 'Scully' anymore which I'm sure gives her great joy but makes me a little sad.
I know exactly what you mean. I miss her, too.
Glasgow
Feb 3, 2004 @ 7:09 am
i don't mind the blonde, but did no one think to buy her some conditioner for christmas? like, i know for a fact they have aveda AND toni & guy in notting hill.
JimsBride
Feb 3, 2004 @ 9:20 am
I think she looks much better in these pictures than in the ones posted before. I do miss the red though...
Ruby Trample of Woody End
Feb 3, 2004 @ 9:35 am
but did no one think to buy her some conditioner for christmas
Maybe a flattening iron as well.
I *love* the coat though.
As An Amoeba
Feb 3, 2004 @ 11:27 am
Well, I remember once reading an article where she said something like, "If you ever see me with my hair looking nice, someone's done it for me." So maybe that still holds true, though you might think she'd have figured it out by now. <g> Gillian, regular trims are your friend.
I do like the outfit though. The sweater and coat are very nice. More
here (it's the same site I posted that had the red dress pics, just updated), and you can click for a bigger picture without registering (though of course it's got a watermark). I really like her with
so little makeup. Freckly.
bmills
Feb 3, 2004 @ 2:18 pm
Ah, the freckles. We haven't seen those since, what? S2?
JimsBride
Feb 3, 2004 @ 4:26 pm
What a great close-up! She looks adorable.
Glasgow
Feb 4, 2004 @ 7:09 am
i would kill for her complexion, what lovely skin she has. not sure about the ice-pop deep pink lippy. but apart from that - and the hair... aw shucks, you know i would rather have her look all natural and "un"done than supra-enhanced like Paltrow or whoever, you know?
Slippin' Mickeys
Feb 5, 2004 @ 6:35 pm
She does look adorable... And totally not at all Scully!
ETA: You know, with that look, they could totally start filming XF2 (the movie that's never going to happen) with a killer look for Scully-on-the-lam.
Scrambled Eggs
Feb 6, 2004 @ 2:30 am
Gillian must have a painting in her attic, because I swear she looks younger in each photo. So dreadfully unfair.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.