CLARK: So I'm supposed to be happy that my best friend was fired?
LOIS: Absolutely
seems pretty much like:
I also feel like Chloe did have her happy resolution
So Chloe's happy resolution is to be fired by Lex? Unbelievable. I can't imagine this as a happy resolution for anyone.
If that is the writer's theory, it is a pure pro-Clois perception management tactic. Kind of reminiscent of the "Emperor's New Clothes". Keep telling us that the storyline is happy and right and we will foolishly believe that? A bit transparent of the writers to keep trying to sell us this (not that
Craig is a writer, but they seem to have the same perspective based on the Arctic dialog). Does this also mean that Grant Gabriel telling Chloe she has lost her mojo is the voice of truth versus a smarmy tabloidesque editor looking for Aliens on Earth headlines? (It was true about the aliens, but he had no reason to believe it). It would appear in the "dump Chloe so as to elevate Lois" campaign, that is
precisely the perception management the writers are trying to provide. Again, a dozen ways to accomplish what they want -- instead they litterally dump on Chloe's happiness to provide Lois opportunity.
There were a dozen ways to have Chloe leave the Daily Planet to support Lois and Clois, it defies logic to me that her leaving by being fired by Lex was a happy resolution. If the writers are pursing this perspection management travesty, I am going to speculate that Chloe won't even mention the Daily Planet in S8. I think we were supposed to pick that up from the book she was reading in Sleeper. Or was it the way she devoted 30 seconds to the topic within minutes of being fired?
Bad Toad,
1)
[I don't really feel like Chloe was wrongly fired. She had been using the DP resources for things that had nothing at all to do with the DP.
The issue is not whether the villian of the story had an excuse to fire Chloe, it's whether or not this represents a "happy" resolution for Chloe. As the audience we know that Chloe essentially lost her job because she prioritized helping Clark over her journalism. But that does not make losing her job a happy experience. Further, although it's true that Lex probably could prove that Chloe used the DP for her personal pursuits, we can't say she wasn't working on Daily Planet business for her required time each day. The long hours indicated to me that she was working more than 9 to 5 so it's ambiguous as to whether or not she was performing her duties as required. As for non-DP work, perhaps with interns or reporters in night-school it's okay for them to use the research. Chloe could claim it was student work. So, while I can understand that from what we saw on-screen, we could reasonably speculate that Lex could easily have used his data he gathered to fire her -- he didn't. He accused her of keeping a key from him. Theoretically, Lex has no proof that key is his. Lionel gave the key to Chloe and Lex took it. Under what legal basis did he take the key from her? She even said (although we know she lied) that she wouldn't have kept it from him. He fired her because he was pissed. He could have fired Lois for being a lousy speller. He seemed to have no problem randomly firing anyone based on Chloe's commentary in Persona. The way the scene was played, if you showed it to someone without any prior knowledge of the two characters, they'd certainly have a hard time calling the specific reason she was fired "just". Finally, from an audience perspective, Chloe is considered one of the "good guys" who was fired because she supported the "hero" of the story. That seems neither "just" as a plotline nor "happy" for the character.
2)
I see absolutely no evidence on this show that Chloe is going to nightschool.
We did have evidence. When Grant rattled off Chloe's resume he said she was going to night school. On SV, that's more evidence than we typically get. What possible reason to make up the "night school" comment if she was not still at school.
3)
And a lot of the time we've seen Chloe putting in ridiculous hours at work, we don't actually see what she's doing
While I agree that doesn't mean she's passionate about journalism, it was clear that she was working her butt off to keep the Daily Planet floating in Persona. She turned down helping Bizarro for that. In Cure, Lana also remarked that she hadn't seen much of Chloe because the new editor had kept her so busy. So, there are at least two incidents where it was evident that her long hours had nothing to do with Clark or her personal business and everything to do with her job.
Having said all this, I think the writers will no longer pursue Chloe at school because "it's boring" --- so it's yet another dangling plot line.
FallenOne:
1)
there is no reason on Earth why Clark shouldn't accept Lois' offer
- Lois has no ability to offer Clark a job, she took him an application. In the future she may be an important reporter but at this point in SV she's still in the basement with no pull --- and far far from the first lady of the Daily Planet at the current time.
- Taking a job at the place where your BFF was fired from for helping you is being an ingrate. Yes Chloe is a big girl and made her own decisions but of all the places Clark could work if he wanted to get away from the farm (which he has stated he does not), going to work where Chloe was fired due to helping him is not in keeping with Clark's personality. It's a Lois thing, not a Clark thing.
2)
I don't think Clark's progress, which is leading toward him accepting Lois' offer of working at the DP, should be haulted to appease Chloe. I mean what are we asking here? Its Clark Kent.. its the Daily Planet...
This requires the meta "pre-destiny" argument. And Chloe wouldn't object so much as Clark would know that he was being rude. BTW, I actually hold Lois different than Clark in this regard. When Lois took the job I had no problem with it because it wasn't at Chloe's expense (Grant was being rude to Chloe but it was in keeping with his personality). More importantly, Lois had established herself as wanting to be in journalism and to leave The Inquisitor. Her taking advantage of the opportunity made far more sense than Clark moving in that direction.
3)
I didn't see Clark's name in the Torch, except on the lunch menu page.
You forgot the floormats and the failed "favorite teacher" article.
Regardless of lame excuse, I am convinced they will show us Clark entering into the DP in S8 in order to close the pre-destination gap.
But back to the point I'm trying to make. The show has had several clunky moments with Chloe being pushed out of the Daily Planet this year. Some subtext about her being busy with superhero work has been attempted to show rationale but absolutely nothing has been provided to show this as a happy resolution for her character. I believe that the lazy writers are once again attempting to patch over these plot cracks as "I meant to that" ala Pee Wee Herman. I'm not about to fall for the posturing as anything but an attempted "spin" to sugar coat poor planning on their part. I fully expect them to continue this downward spiral for Chloe in S8 while artifically putting Lois and Clark together in the Daily Planet quickly because they are too incompetent to do it naturally.