Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: The Badlands: Behind the Scenes of Trek
TWoP Forums > Other TV Shows > Sci-Fi and Action Adventure Shows > Star Trek
Aatrek
Rich Sternbach weighs in on Zero Hour's use of CGI:

My oh my. Anyone notice how they used my MIDAS array from Voyager (Barkley's giant cell phone node) as the Yosemite Station for "Zero Hour"? Jeepers, once Starfleet gets a design they like, they don't let go of it for hundreds of years.

---

...this is just plain laziness and/or not wanting to spend a few bucks-- er, I mean, maybe decommissioned crewed stations were much later converted to uncrewed subspace com platforms. Yeah, that's got to be the explanation.

---

Gee, maybe I can put the Yosemite Station on my resume. [laughs]

---

TBTP can certainly use anything I designed for the franchise in any manner that they see fit; they've reused designs before and doubtless they will again. They've even reused things I suspect they had no clue about from previous series (mostly props they likely found lying about in boxes, repainted, and put on screen). It's fun seeing things appear from before; I ain't gonna tell them what bits, though.


I'm glad I wasn't the only one to notice this.

Source: TrekBBS (registration required).
Lexx
I'm relieved that I wasn't the only person who noticed the MIDAS array thing. It's not that big of a deal, but I did think it was kind of lazy/cheap to use the exact same model and not alter it at all.
Linguist
I'm fairly new around here (been doing a lot of catch-up reading) [ETA: and this post bumps me to "Channel Surfer! Woohoo!] and so sometimes I'll come across something in one of the threads that I want to comment on, only to see that it was something from a year ago or more. Most of the time I don't bother, because it's either a minor point or it gets addressed later, but this one was, I think, kind of left hanging. In May of 2003, hollytree asked about the difference between a "story arc" and "continuity." I read the replies, and although there was "sort of" a resolution, I had a thought that I could maybe boil it down to a few words. So, here goes:

Anything that happens in the "Previously on Enterprise..." part of the teaser is story arc. It's that part of what went before that you need to know to understand this part.

I need to know that the Xindi are being aided by the SphereBuilders to understand why it is so important to destroy the spheres and thus why the Enterprise doesn't go after the super-weapon itself.

I don't need to know that T'Pol and Trip are in the "should I try for a goodnight kiss?" phase of a relationship, or that Denobulans enjoy, well, just about everything, for the episode to make sense.

Sorry for the timewarp...
Cleo256
That's a good distinction, Linguist. I like that guideline. Of course, in May 2003, there were no previouslies on this show, so the point really couldn't have been made back then.
Silja
The fact that there are now previouslies also says a great deal about the way this show has changed. I can't recall previouslies being used before to any great extent (BoBW on TNG perhaps?) and this season they were included in something like half of the episodes. The concept of continuity has in many ways been replaced by the story arch and I can't say that I'd like to complain about that. I rather like it.
Aatrek
DS9 started to use the previouslies more and more once the Dominion War started.
Cleo256
In the interest of pulling non-spoilery stuff out of the spoiler thread so as to share with all the children:
StarTrek.com has a similar article to the Trek Today one, but with this extra tidbit:

We asked Coto, what unique creative vision does he think he brings to the show? "Well, first and foremost, I bring a passionate love of all things Star Trek," he said. "I've loved Star Trek since I was a little kid. When Star Trek Communicator magazine was doing a little article on me, I went through my box of old photos, and I found a shot of me at age 11 watching Star Trek on TV, with a picture of Spock on the screen. In that same box I found a comic book that I had written — I must have written this when I was 10 — and it was a Star Trek comic book, with 'Beam me up Scotty' and all this. And I realized, 'Oh my God, I've been doing this my entire life!'"

He attended conventions in his hometown of Orlando, Florida, and has followed the subsequent series, Star Trek: The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine and Voyager, "all the way."

I won't share the link, 'cause the rest is spoilery.

Also, Startrek.com reports that they're underway with filming for the new season. Although, not filming exactly. Director of Photography Marvin Rush has switched them to digital video. He claims we won't notice the difference.
Belchimaera
Thanks for sharing the non-spoilery stuff!! Can anyone explain what digital video is?
Harrison Fjord
It means they're using a high definition digital camera to shoot the episodes instead of film. Since we never see a projected image, we shouldn't see any difference, since those of us with normal TVs will be seeing a lower resolution image than the camera is shooting anyway. Those with high-def shouldn't notice either, since the camera resolution should be as high or higher than the resolution of HDTV.

It's the same stuff that Lucas used to shoot Episodes II & III; it lends itself well to special effectsy stuff. The best film stock is still a better image than digital, but digital is cleaner and I doubt that most people could tell the difference, especially when you're only seeing it on TV.
RiverThames
Once Upon A Time In Mexico was also shot on DV. In the special features Rodriguez raves about how much more flexible, time saving and money saving it is.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.