|
|
![]() ![]() |
» Ratings and Scheduling Issues: Fashion Critique
|
|
Fanatic |
Sep 29, 2006 @ 10:03 am
Just how fashionable is Ugly Betty according to Nielsen and the network? Here's the place to talk it over.
|
|
Fanatic |
Sep 29, 2006 @ 10:17 am
Does anyone know if they are going to re-air this show?
|
|
Fanatic |
Sep 29, 2006 @ 10:18 am
You can see it online at ABC.com and I think ABC Family is airing it tonight.
|
|
Stalker |
Sep 29, 2006 @ 11:10 am
Ratings for the premiere:
Zap2it: The premiere of the critically hailed "Ugly Betty" scored a 10.7/17 for ABC at 8 p.m. "Survivor: Cook Islands," 9.6/15, was second in households for CBS but won the hour in viewers and adults 18-49. First place! (Mediaweek is not up yet) This post has been edited by seffina: Sep 29, 2006 @ 11:11 am. |
|
Stalker |
Sep 29, 2006 @ 11:27 am
Ugly never looked so smashing, darling!
Mediaweek update: Beginning with the show everyone was talking about, let’s just say the results for ABC’s Ugly Betty were anything but ugly. [The critically acclaimed one-hour comedy roared out of the gate with a 12.2/19 in the overnights (#1), 16.09 million viewers (#2) and a 4.9/14 among adults 18-49 (#2) at 8 p.m. Comparatively, that was an improvement over the year-ago season-premiere of former occupant Alias (Overnights: 6.4/10; Viewers: 8.21 million; A18-49: 2.5/ 7 on Thursday, Sept. 29, 2005) of a whopping 91 percent in the overnights, 7.88 million viewers and 96 percent among adults 18-49. Survivor: Cook Islands, meanwhile, was down but not out with a 9.6/15 in the overnights (#2), 16.60 million viewers (#1) and a 5.8/16 among adults 18-49 (#1). While that is still worthy of a winner’s listing, am I the only one who feels ripped off that Survivor merged the teams already? Edited to add link for babelfish...sorry about that! This post has been edited by mtlchickie: Sep 29, 2006 @ 12:51 pm. |
|
Video Archivist |
Sep 29, 2006 @ 11:30 am
mtlchickie, do you have the link to the Mediaweek article?
|
|
Video Archivist |
Sep 29, 2006 @ 11:33 am
I am so excited about those numbers! Yeah for good ratings.
|
![]() ![]() |

