|
|
![]() ![]() |
» The Daily Show with Jon Stewart
|
|
Stalker |
Oct 8, 2009 @ 10:53 am
I loved seeing Wyatt, but I couldn't care less about how the economic turndown is affecting rappers, joke or not.
The interview was sheer delight. |
|
Fanatic |
Oct 8, 2009 @ 12:46 pm
Next week's guests:
10/12: Secretary Janet Napolitano (Secretary of Homeland Security) 10/13: Chesley Sullenberger (airline pilot & author – promoting book “Highest Duty: My Search for What Really Matters”) 10/14: Barbara Ehrenreich (author – promoting book “Bright-sided: How the Relentless Promotion of Positive Thinking Has Undermined America”) 10/15: TBD Week of 10/19: DARK! I must admit I wasn't sure if that rapper last night was real, or if the entire bit was a parody. It seemed so over the top. I guess he is for real, though. |
|
Fanatic |
Oct 8, 2009 @ 3:50 pm
Excellent write-up, as usual, UnderCover. You certainly ended up at a great show; it was a touching interview and an impressive young man.
Maybe you would if you'd hire more women, Jon. Just sayin'. I mean, not that shtupping the staff is admirable, but would a little more diversity hurt? [/goodnatured nitpick] Interesting that you should say that, attica finch, as I just linked this in a blog post I put together a little while ago: it's an interview with Daily Show co-creator Lizz Winstead discussing women in comedy. In the past, I'd heard people like Allison Silverman saying that they always got more applications from men than women. Although I certainly don't think Jon (or Stephen) is sexist at all, to me, that statement could have meant almost anything (i.e. a thirty or forty percent female applicant pool still counts as more men than women applying). But three out of 150? Ouch. I would, of course, love to see more women and/or minorities on the writing staffs of the shows, but if they're still not seeing the applicants ... |
|
Fanatic |
Oct 8, 2009 @ 4:19 pm
shamskygirl, according to this recent New Yorker piece, "(Jay) Leno has no women writers on his show. Neither does David Letterman, and neither does Conan O’Brien."
It seems like a lot of TV comedy writers come out of the Harvard Lampoon -- including O'Brien himself, any number of "Simpsons" writers over the years and no doubt plenty of TDS writers. I would be curious how many women work on the Lampoon and why they might choose careers other than TV comedy writing. It must be a pretty cutthroat, high-stress, competitive field, and maybe more men than women are willing to go through that? I don't know. A few weeks ago, someone posted here that TDS had recruited writer/blogger Daniel Radosh after reading some short pieces he had written. Maybe they should actively be seeking out funny women. I mean, it must be a bit of a relief that the cries of "diversity" have calmed down now that they have Larry, Wyatt and Aasif on board. |
|
Fanatic |
Oct 8, 2009 @ 5:18 pm
The Newark Star-Ledger just posted a new Q&A with John Oliver. There are a bunch of fun bits in it, but I think this is my favorite:
Q. Stephen Colbert had left when you started. Did you feel like they were big shoes to fill? A. Trying to fill his shoes is like standing in clown shoes. His comment on what he and Wyatt generally write was interesting, too. And here's a little clip of Aasif, who was at last night's premiere for the new stage production of Hamlet. He talks about the new M. Night Shyamalan film, which (obviously) he's in. |
|
Fanatic |
Oct 8, 2009 @ 6:45 pm
The only woman late-night writer I can recall gaining any level of notice was Merrill Markoe, in the early days of Letterman's "Late Night." Don't forget Tina Fey, who was head writer of "SNL" for many years! I (heart) Tina. If the show really does work in large degree with freelancers, maybe they could cultivate some of those women contributors more actively. I'm not sure Sam was accurate. This Los Angeles Times article about freelance joke writers quotes TDS head writer Steve Bodow as saying the program does NOT accept them due to the "potential for producers to unfairly exploit the many hungry writers out there -- stringing them along, paying them for piecework, and never creating real staff-level jobs." |
![]() ![]() |

